Economic News

http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm

Here is a link to the data released this a.m. for GDP.

I am still looking at the numbers; based on the initial review the primary driver for the increase was exports. This isn’t too surprising when you factor in the weakening dollar. Imports did increase as expected (one word….oil) but not to the extent I was expecting. Imports may have a bigger impact in the next quarter.

I bet that the Fed would hold interest rates steady today, but I doubt my decision. A .25 reduction would not be a bad move for the economy. It appears that the rate reduction has been priced into the dollar and when you look at the GDP numbers, the residential structures component is gloomy.
 
U.S. Sept. construction spending rises 0.3%

By Robert Schroeder
Last Update: 10:00 AM ET Oct 31, 2007


WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- Gains in spending on commercial and public construction projects offset another decline in spending on housing projects in September, pushing overall construction spending up by 0.3%, the Commerce Department reported Wednesday. Private nonresidential construction spending climbed by 1.5%, while public construction spending rose by 1.9%, the Commerce Department said. But spending on housing projects fell by 1.4%, the 19th straight decline and a reflection of the ongoing slump in the housing and mortgage markets. That spending is down 16.4% in the last year.

http://tinyurl.com/2cthrz
 
Productivity in U.S. Increases More Than Forecast (Update3)
By Courtney Schlisserman

Nov. 7 (Bloomberg) -- Worker productivity in the U.S. accelerated more than forecast in the third quarter, leading to a decline in labor costs.
Productivity, a measure of employee efficiency, rose at an annual rate of 4.9 percent, the most in four years and up from a revised 2.2 percent in the second quarter, the Labor Department said today in Washington. Labor expenses dropped at a 0.2 percent pace, the first decrease in more than a year.

Greater efficiency helps ease concern companies will raise prices to make up for cost increases, further diminishing the threat of inflation. Slower economic growth in the last three months of the year will push up the jobless rate, which will continue to limit pay gains.

``This is short-term good news for the Federal Reserve and should help alleviate some of their near-term concerns regarding inflation,'' said Drew Matus, senior economist at Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in New York. Still, ``we think it could prove short-lived given expectations for growth and employment in the fourth quarter.''

Over the past 12 months, productivity increased 2.4 percent, the most since the first three months of 2005.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a3_YORtPRpJg&refer=home
 
S&P Says State Street CDO Liquidates; Ratings Slashed (Update1)

By Jody Shenn

Nov. 8 (Bloomberg) -- Standard & Poor's said a collateralized debt obligation managed by State Street Corp. began liquidating its assets, prompting the ratings firm to slice the investment vehicle's ratings as much as 18 levels.

The ratings on the most senior class of Carina CDO Ltd. were lowered to BB, two levels below investment grade, from AAA, while another AAA class was slashed 18 steps to CCC-. The chance of material losses to noteholders is high, New York-based S&P said.

Carina is the first CDO to began unwinding after a slump in the credit worthiness of the underlying assets, S&P said. Thirteen others have informed S&P of an event of default, a precursor to liquidation. A widespread fire sale by CDOs, which package asset-backed securities and resell them in pieces, may further exacerbate declines in subprime-mortgage securities.

``We believe the liquidation process has begun'' for Carina, S&P said in the statement.

Investors are already concerned about forced assets sales by structured investment vehicles, or SIVs, which own about $300 billion of securities and have dumped more than $75 billion after being unable to finance themselves. U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson was worried enough to push the nation's largest banks to set up a fund to buy some of the assets.

The decline in the value of CDOs and subprime-mortgage securities prompted banks including Citigroup Inc., Merrill Lynch & Co. and Morgan Stanley to write down their holdings by at least $30 billion.

`Depressed Prices'

S&P said on Oct. 22 it may lower ratings on $20.6 billion of CDOs as defaults on subprime mortgages within the securities rose to records. Some bonds have fallen as much as 80 cents on the dollar as delinquencies rose, contaminating debt worldwide.

Carina was originally a $1.5 billion CDO issued in September 2006, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Carolyn Cichon, a spokeswoman for State Street, didn't immediately return a telephone call for comment.

Senior noteholders of the CDO decided to liquidate, S&P said. The firm didn't identify the senior investors.

The securities will be sold at ``what will most assuredly be depressed prices,'' S&P said.

Events of default, triggered by ratings cuts to holdings of the CDOs, can force the transactions to liquidate, S&P said last week. Alternatively, the events would result in all payments being diverted to the most senior classes, whose owners may vote on whether to liquidate, S&P said.

Carina's default event occurred after the credit quality of its collateral fell below a predetermined level, triggering the notice.

Unwilling Noteholders

Most CDO noteholders would be unwilling to force the entity to liquidate because they would still end up losing money, Anthony Thompson, a CDO analyst at Deutsche Bank AG in New York said in a Nov. 5 report.

``Many investors would be loathe to exercise such an option,'' Thompson said.

When CDOs made up of high-yield corporate bonds experienced default events earlier this decade, few senior investors forced them to unwind, Vishwanath Tirupattur, a CDO analyst at Morgan Stanley in New York, said on a conference call with investors this week.

``On the other hand, the investors of the senior-most classes were very different than they are today,'' when more are held by dealers who must already recognize regular changes in the CDOs' values, Tirupattur said. ``So, the possibility of a liquidation is somewhat higher than in the past.''

S&P said it made the downgrades of Carina assuming the assets will be sold. If the liquidation notice is rescinded, S&P said the ratings on the top classes would be reduced by one or two levels, based on a decline in the credit quality of the securities.

To contact the reporter on this story: Jody Shenn in New York at jshenn@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: November 8, 2007 19:14 EST

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601009&sid=aZe.mdJ82ndE&refer=bond
 
I read this over on Noriel Roubini’s Blog, link below, this is a post from one of his posters named Bernard. I didn’t check the numbers but I thought it was an interesting view into the level 3 assets held of some of financial institutions.

http://www.rgemonitor.com/blog/roubini/224871/

I have a neat idea.

Why don't we take every single major financial institution out there and then divide their total Level 3 assets by their equity capital base and make comparisons?

This will give us a better idea as to which of them may really remain solvent at the end of the day. Shall we?

Let's have a look at Citigroup. Their equity base is $128 billion.

Therefore, their Level 3 assets to equity ratio: 105%

How about Goldman Sachs?

Level 3 assets are $72 billion, equity base is $39 billion.
Their Level 3 assets to equity ratio is 185%.

Morgan Stanley:

$88 billion in Level 3, equity base is $35 billion. Ratio: 251% (WOW!)

Bear Stearns:

$20 billion in Level 3, equity base is $13 billion. Ratio: 154%

Lehman Brothers:

$35 billion in Level 3, $22 billion in equity. Ratio: 159%

Merrill Lynch:

$16 billion in Level 3, $42 billion in equity. Ratio: 38%

Here is the Level 3 assets to equity ratio summary:

Citigroup 105%
Goldman Sachs 185%
Morgan Stanley 251%
Bear Stearns 154%
Lehman Brothers 159%
Merrill Lynch 38%

This becomes very interesting now, doesn't it?

Looks to me like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are by far in the WORST situation among the investment banks.

And yet the media is focusing all of their attention on Merrill Lynch---which actually has by far THE LEAST EXPOSURE of all of them. What a joke.

As I said before, the media should stop diverting attention and trying to make this into a "Merrill-specific" problem.

All of the investment banks are in deep trouble. These numbers should make that extremely evident. The deception must be exposed.
Written by Bernard on 2007-11-05 11:33:55
 
It was disclosed on the blog that the individual who posted the remark was Bernard Ber from Canada. Here is a link to a paper he wrote.

http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/toomuch.html

There are quite a few bearish folks out in the world; I don’t want to discount their opinions, however they do provide a point of view that could be helpful in our investing. Same thing could be said for the bulls; I try to read everything Birchtree posts :D. So when you read these types of papers, bull or bear, do it with the intent of adding to your knowledge of markets.
 
And BAC rates best of the bunch, but let's hope there has been no finagling with the figures and then of course asset values could change.



NEW YORK, Nov 8 (Reuters) - As credit markets seized up this summer, Wall
Street banks became increasingly dependent on their valuation models to come up
with figures for their assets. But as more and more assets were pushed into the
hard-to-value category, some investors worry that the banks' models have been
too optimistic and that they could face crippling losses. For story please <see
[ID:nN08449640]
The following table shows banks' "Level 3" assets, as disclosed in theirlatest U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings. Under U.S. accountingrules, Level 3 assets are valued based on models when there is little, if anymarket activity for the asset. COMPANY LEVEL 3 ASSETS EQUITY RATIO AS OFMorgan Stanley (MS.N: Quote, Profile, Research) $88.21 billion $35.36 billion 2.49 Aug 31Goldman Sachs (GS.N: Quote, Profile, Research) $72.05 billion $39.12 billion 1.84 AugustLehman Brothers (LEH.N: Quote, Profile, Research) $34.68 billion $21.73 billion 1.60 Aug 31Bear Stearns (BSC.N: Quote, Profile, Research) $20.25 billion $13.00 billion 1.56 Aug 31Citigroup Inc (C.N: Quote, Profile, Research) $134.84 billion $126.91 billion 1.06 Sep 30Merrill Lynch (MER.N: Quote, Profile, Research) $15.39 billion $38.62 billion 0.40 Sep 28Bank of America (BAC.N: Quote, Profile, Research) $21.64 billion $135.75 billion 0.16 June 30Source: 2007 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filings (Reporting by Emily Chasan; Editing by Gary Hill)
 
Goldman Held Bigger Share of Level 3 Assets Than Citi, Merrill

By Yalman Onaran and Christine Harper

Nov. 12 (Bloomberg) -- Goldman Sachs Group Inc. held a bigger proportion of hard-to-value assets at the end of the third quarter than Citigroup Inc. and Merrill Lynch & Co., two of the firms hardest hit by subprime mortgage losses.
Goldman's Level 3 assets, for which market prices are so scarce that companies use internal models to gauge their value, accounted for 6.9 percent of the New York-based firm's $1.05 trillion total at the end of August, according to a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Citigroup classified 5.7 percent of its assets as Level 3 on Sept. 30 and Merrill reported 2.5 percent.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a9yNwqgsVPGA&refer=home

[GS] The Goldman Sachs Group Inc
Symbol: GS
Last Price: 218.87
Change: +7.54 (+3.44%)
Website: click here



Today 11:57am
The Goldman Sachs Group Inc Shares raised to market perform from sell at a boutique firm (timing uncertain)
Other headlines for [GS]

[GS] Today 11:57am
The Goldman Sachs Group Inc Shares raised to market perform from sell at a boutique firm (timing uncertain)

• Yesterday 06:54pm
TTN analysis: Goldman Sachs rumors - The UK's Sunday Express reports today that fears are growing about the health of Goldman Sachs, which many believe will have to admit to sub-prime losses of as a more...
http://www.tradethenews.com/story_details.asp?id=301404

I’m keeping my eye on GS since they have yet to devalue because of their subprime exposure. It could be a market mover.
 
" Wall Street's money machine breaks down
The subprime mortgage crisis keeps getting worse-and claiming more victims. A Fortune special report. "

" What really spooks investors is the fog surrounding the future. One problem is that they can't trust management's estimates of future losses. Citi, for example, says it will take additional write-downs of $8 billion to $11 billion in the fourth quarter. "

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/11/26/101232838/index.htm
 
Today 10:02am

The Goldman Sachs Group Inc CEO: says no significant asset writedowns planned - Q&A at Merrill banking conf

- Says continues to be net short in mortgage markets
- Says Level 3 assets include Private Equity, Real Estate, and Leveraged Loans
- Says 'we have a pretty good grip' on asset valuations
- Says mortgage market will eventually recover and will seek opportunities


Maybe I'm looking at this wrong, I was expecting GS to do some write-offs and not just a few million. If and when they do face the potential downside to the Level 3 assets it should be significant. Maybe the CEO is just trying to protect his A$$ets :D
 
I just saw that Krammer picked CS as a buy............he said they disclosed the subprime early. Did anyone else see this? Anyone else know a link to the story?
 
He did the best he could do at the time. The moral of the story is don't buy what you can't pay for. When you buy a SUV you realize it will cost more to drive. The same with an ARM.
 
McDonald's falls to 4-mo low; FBR reinitiates cover at lower rating
Shares of McDonald's Corp. dropped sharply Friday, hitting a 4-month low in intraday trading, amid concerns that weakening consumer confidence will lead to a deceleration in restaurant spending in the near term, and limit the stock's upside.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/22609977/for/cnbc/
 
Jittery shoppers kept retail sales flat in Dec
NEW YORK - Retail spending by Americans was little changed in December as consumers anxious over the housing slump and high oil prices held back on purchases during the crucial holiday season. U.S. retail sales excluding cars were unchanged last month, the first time in more than a year that they did not post a gain. December's stagnant sales followed a robust 0.8 percent increase in November despite many retailers offering hefty discounts and other incentives to entice shoppers. The year-end retail picture was even more dismal without accounting for what consumers paid for pricey gasoline. Sales excluding autos and gasoline fell 0.7 percent last month.
http://www.cnbc.com/id/22610044/for/cnbc/
 
Back
Top