I view the AT as a tool. It is a very good tool for seeing what your actual returns are without the 'pollution' of contributions. So, yes, I keep the AT accurate.
Since AT is not blocked at my worksite I will enact the official trade, then update the AT, and then make an entry in my thread - in that order. I have missed one trade (in 2008 for two days and it didn't make a difference so I didn't hassle Tom) and I did have the official site not post a legal trade that Tom backed me out of in the AT. That is over seven years. I value the AT as a financial tool - but I am not against a little smack - see 2009 with me and BT lobbing scuds

.
As far as noting that some make big moves and some make allocation adjustments, I think that is just trading style. I don't think there are too many survivors out there that are just gunning for mugs with fake trades. Remember, they would have to have an incredible crystal ball to consistently make the right moves. What I have seen from those I track is that the good ones are worth following. And, in general they comment in their threads. Doing so can make you look bad when you 'guess' wrong in an attempt to make the big win (see my posts over the past year or so:cheesy

. You really cannot backdate moves on the AT since you have to make them by 1200 EST. Maybe you could hassle Tom to constantly back you out of trades resulting in one day losses of -0.38% or something. But, what difference does it make!!! Are you going to hassle Tom to get you into a day of market up-moves (+0.13%) the next day. Me thinks Tom would figure that one out pretty quick, eh

. You might have been able to gain a bit in the AT in 2008/09, but I don't think so. My delayed entry in the AT cost me nothing on the AT as far as positioning - it was something like 0.02% to the positive so I should have yelled for justice!!!
One thing to note about the AT is rather obvious. It obviously cannot take into consideration your contributions. My contributions are 0/0/40/30/30 so my equities are always getting a little boost. Thus, my actual returns have been marginally better than the AT. Regardless, the AT does take into account dividend reinvestment because it tracks the 'C Fund' rather than the S&P500. So, in the end, many thanks to Tom for this site and a tremendous applause to those active on the site and a modest apology for all those who make long and inane posts on this site.:nuts: