Hi Airlift. I'm can't say for certain but I went to their website and gleamed this from the site:
Why should you care about this data? According the originator of the survey and past NAAIM President William Hepburn, “NAAIM advisors absolutely nailed the 2008 decline by steadily reducing equity allocations beginning in late 2007.” Hepburn goes on to note, “NAAIM members had an average equity exposure of only 19% from June 2008 through March 2009.”
The survey is now seven years old. Ned Davis Research notes that when the NAAIM Survey is above 73% (which occurs approximately 23% of the time), the S&P 500 has lost ground at an annualized rate of -3.8% per year. This is likely due to the fact that by the time the survey sports a high reading; most managers have already established long positions.
When the survey reading is between 14% and 73%, the S&P has gained +1.9% per year (approximately 70% of the time). And when the survey reading is below 14% the S&P has gained at a rate of +40.0% (again, a low reading suggests that managers have already sold and likely have cash on hand ready to commit). This reading has only occurred 6% of the time.
- See more at:
NAAIM Exposure Index: Managers Adapt To Changing Environment | State of the Markets
Summary from what I read: If the survey is between 14 and 73%, the S&P gains at a marginal rate (70% chance); if less than 14%, the S&P gains at a much larger rate but market risk is higher (much smaller chance), and the lower the survey score the lower the equity positions held my money managers which has correlated with market downturns.
FS