Allocation is King...
After review, my current allocation is invalid – but, not so much so that I am going to blow an IFT. I used a variant of my models found in my thread from some time ago. So, it is time for me to document my normal allocations.
My three standard allocations are built on Ric Edelman’s ‘Lies About Money’ and the Quicken’s ‘Portfolio Analyzer’ (based on Newport Group analysis).
A flat earther analysis of those portfolios provides (as of 2009/12/04):
Formatted: G/F/C/S/I Expected Return/Expected Risk : 2008 %, 2009 %, From 2007/10/09 %
Portfolio 30 (Conservative): 12/22/39/15/12 7%/9% : -23.62%, +21.43%, -9.96%
Portfolio 37 (Normal): 2/15/48/19/16 8%/11% : -30.93%, +25.02%, -17.27%
Portfolio 41 (Aggressive): 2/0/50/28/20 9%/13% : -37.63%, +27.76, -24.75%
Our individual funds are as follows:
Formatted: G/F/C/S/I Expected Return/Expected Risk : 2008 %, 2009 %, From 2007/10/09 %
G Fund Portfolio: 100/0/0/0/0 2%/0% : +3.75%, +2.75%, +7.71%
F Fund Portfolio: 0/100/0/0/0 4%/5% : +5.45%, +6.75%, +17.07%
C Fund Portfolio: 0/0/100/0/0 8%/16% : -36.99%, +25.47%, -26.20%
S Fund Portfolio: 0/0/0/100/0 10%/21% : -38.32%, +29.98%, -27.97%
I Fund Portfolio: 0/0/0/0/100 8%/17% : -44.43%, +31.57, -28.97%
L2040: 9/10/40/17/24 8%/10% : -31.53%, +24.30%, -19.46%
L2030: 20/9/36/15/20 7%/9% : -27.50%, +21.70%, -15.81%
L2020: 32/8/31/11/18 6%/8% : -22.77%, +18.54%, -11.83%
L2010: 64/6/17/5/8 4%/4% : -10.53%, +9.69%, -3.29%
LIncome: 74/6/12/3 3%/2% : -5.09%, +8.26%, +2.29%
Wow, 2008 and the first quarter of 2009 were massively ugly. It does prove that asset allocation is the most important element of investing. For those with a 20+ year investment horizon all of the allocation models (L2030, L2040, ED30, ED37, ED41) provided better return/risk results than the individual C/S/I funds. That is a factor or risk – and, we have been living in a very risky business.
Did I follow my own advice?
Not completely.
But, then again, I was involved in a very aggressive futures and options trading system for three years in the 90’s. Kinda got a good feel for tops and bottoms – I hope. Not everyone lived that dream. And, in actuality – even though I made some green – I don’t recommend it. The taxes were ugly and paid via my income, the tax preparation uglier, there were no dividends, the trading fees absolutely monstrous, and – contrary to public opinion – day trading in a choppy market is a sure path to an Alpo diet. But since the mid to late 90’s were so consistent I made mulla.
To make this horribly long post a bit shorter, I saw a frothy market top and started peeling away at my riskier investments. If I hadn’t been so smart by half in October 2008 (thinking a market bottom had been reached) I would have been in a better situation. Oh, well – proof that it will be dumb to follow my dumb money moves :cheesy:. So, 2008 and 2009 we were in a rapid swing trading market. Like 2000 and 2001 they were not investing markets. Now, not so much. Still dangerous, but I don’t think we are talking about crashes outside the mean. The normal risk is very survivable.
Back to basics.
So boring.
