A Market of Streaks

Four days down in a row, three days up (and counting). I had thought over the weekend that the market would find a short term low by mid-week this week, but that's not looking too likely now. Now I'm thinking the weakness comes later in the week, but I'm not so sure we'll be filling those gaps anytime soon so any weakness will probably fall short of those targets. That's assuming we get weakness of course.

Liquidity continues to trump negative news and getting invested on a dip has been a great strategy for a couple of years now. Too bad we can only play that game once or twice a month at best.

But another dip could be getting close at hand, and I've spotted a troubling, albeit somewhat subtle, sign that all may not be as rosy as it appears, so let's take a look at the charts:

$NAMO.jpg

NAMO and NYMO continued their moves higher, which was not surprising given today's strength, but they are once again approaching an area of momentum that has typically seen reversals. Another day of gains could put it firmly in that area. Of course we could reverse any time now, but I'll give it another day or two.

$NAHL.jpg

NAHL and NYHL remain in a buy condition.

$TRIN.jpg

Technically, TRIN is on a sell, while TRINQ is on a buy, but both are sitting right at the neutral line.

BPCOMPQ.png

Here's where things begin to look suspect. The market has rallied three days in a row and BPCOMPQ actually declined a bit. That's unusual given the advance was healthy and it raises my suspicion of what this market is really up to. Bull trap comes to mind. I've said this many times before and it bears repeating, this is an intermediate term trend indicator and probably the most important of the seven sentinels. I don't like what it's telling me right now, but it could be an anomaly. We'll see.

So the system remains in a buy condition overall, although I think we're within a day or two of some selling pressure. As I stated earlier, buying the dips has been working for a long time now and the next one may be just a another opportunity if timed just right. Piece of cake, right? :cheesy:
 
What can the FERS employees do to up the number of interfund transfers per month? Flood them with emails? Hire a lawyer?
 
We fought that battle at the time, but to no avail. And they actually dislike us quite a bit. But as a group, TSP participants are fairly ignorant of their TSP benefits. And most have no inclination to learn about managing their accounts. That's not a knock against them necessarily, but that's the way it is. Without an ability to create critical mass we don't have a chance at fair consideration. Even if we couldn't bring back daily trades, an option to pay for additional ones would be nice though.

Unregistered;bt3189 said:
What can the FERS employees do to up the number of interfund transfers per month? Flood them with emails? Hire a lawyer?
 
CH,

Nice thought regarding trades in excess of two. Why not allow a participant to pay for those trades. There are definitely times where I would gladly do so.

LateR:cheesy:
 
Hi Boghie. Looks like I'll be making a couple of trips out to your neck of the woods next month.

Boghie;bt3191 said:
CH,

Nice thought regarding trades in excess of two. Why not allow a participant to pay for those trades. There are definitely times where I would gladly do so.

LateR:cheesy:
 
I was told that only 1% or less of the TSP participants were "day trading". Yes, I was one of them and made alot more $ than buy & holders. I actually called and tried to talk to the "infamous" TSP board members and never got through. I then called Barclays at the time they supposedly(according to TSP personnel) had the TSP $ and managed it. I talked to "THE MAN" at Barclay's who reported the #'s to the TSP board and he stated that in no way were any funds exchanged between TSP and Barclay's, he was ONLY reporting #'s. It is Blackrock who supposedly handles our funds now.
I believe that these investment managers only report #'s(as stated by Barclay's) and the TSP board makes adjustments to the Fair Value on the I fund (if needed). Therefore there is no monetary exchange, it is all #'s on paper. They will cut us checks when we retire.
Look out for our Gov't to start borrowing against the balance sheet of the TSP program if they have'nt already.
If this is true, it doesn't cost a single dime to tranfer funds! They simply don't want us to move our #'s around.
 
Back
Top