350zCommtech's Account Talk

F fund is looking very good. Look at the MACD. (from Friday, 02/29)
Hi 350,
I was hoping you could pass along some advice, prognostic analysis on following: Think that Monday COB would still be good to move into F??

With "F" up big on Friday, and perhaps again by COB Monday, given this situation, would you feel comfortable with still making a move into F - for Tuesday, and rest of week?

Could an unforeseen, but possible "bail-out" ruin the run for the F-Fund?

I've waited (held to TSP Board's BS Limits), and yes, missed a couple opportunities as a result, even though I know many folks continued to rebalance their accounts as usual. Personally, I wanted to give it 1 month, to see if TSP's threats were real/BS. Very much appreciate any perspective you can provide, for jumping into "F" (for COB Monday)!
VR :)
 
Hi 350,
I was hoping you could pass along some advice, prognostic analysis on following: Think that Monday COB would still be good to move into F??

With "F" up big on Friday, and perhaps again by COB Monday, given this situation, would you feel comfortable with still making a move into F - for Tuesday, and rest of week?

Could an unforeseen, but possible "bail-out" ruin the run for the F-Fund?

I've waited (held to TSP Board's BS Limits), and yes, missed a couple opportunities as a result, even though I know many folks continued to rebalance their accounts as usual. Personally, I wanted to give it 1 month, to see if TSP's threats were real/BS. Very much appreciate any perspective you can provide, for jumping into "F" (for COB Monday)!
VR :)

I'll address the bailout situation first. Basically, there is no bailout.

What is happening at the moment is a group of banks, that have bought insurance from ABK, are being asked to inject capital(that they might not have) into ABK, so that ABK might be able to stay in business, in the event that they might have to pay out insurance on these Bank's CDOs.

If you're not yet ROFLYAO, please reread that long sentence. :D

Now, as for staying in the F fund or moving to the F fund for Tuesday, I'm not sure about that. Because as they say, nothing goes up or down in a straight line. Although, if we were under the 2 IFT restriction, this would not even be a question for me.

Here is a chart of the TNX. As you can see, the RSI suggest there's room to go on the downside(good for F fund). The MACD suggest there is lots of room to go on the downside(very good for F fund). There is a potential for TNX to bounce at around 3.42%, but any bounce will probably be short lived. Perhaps just a one day bounce on Tuesday. The other problem for the F fund is TNX will be testing the lows soon. I'll be a question of how low can yeilds go?

View attachment 3421

Strong support for the Dow at 12200 followed by 12000. Dip buyers will come in soon.

View attachment 3422

Lots of support for SPX. It'll get scary if 1300 fails.

View attachment 3423

Nasdaq Composite has support at 2250, but I think we will see 2200.

View attachment 3424

To summarize, IMO, the TNX suggest that the markets might have just started another leg down. We should now test the January lows and maybe make lower lows. On the hand, if the market rallies signifcantly on Monday and Tuesday, then I am wrong and we might just be going sideways. My bet is on the bond market be right.

I'll wait to see where we are on Monday morning but, at the moment, I'm thinking about getting out of the F fund for Tuesday and then getting back in the F fund for Wednesday.

Good luck.
 
Thanks 350,
I knew that was not an easy question, and yes I did ROFLYAO, on that scenario described!- sounds like just another money-laundering scheme -same ol' game as in past -that got us into this mess!! :D:sick:

Otherwise, tough choices, tough market.
I think you're right about seeing what Monday brings - movement, news, etc...
Thanks again, especially for putting so much effort into your reply!! ;)
VR
 
Thanks 350,
I knew that was not an easy question, and yes I did ROFLYAO, on that scenario described!- sounds like just another money-laundering scheme -same ol' game as in past -that got us into this mess!! :D:sick:

Otherwise, tough choices, tough market.
I think you're right about seeing what Monday brings - movement, news, etc...
Thanks again, especially for putting so much effort into your reply!! ;)
VR

You're welcome.:)
 
IMO, these banks have painted themselves into the proverbial corner. They are begging for cash from overseas to lend and then have to give some of that cash to ABK in order to maintain their rating so that the house of cards does not collapse. So that ABK can pay off the defaulted paper. LOL Robbing Peter to pay Paul. This is like a car wreak that people can not look away from.
 
ISM comes in below 50, at 48.3(contraction), but just above the expected 47.5 and the Yen carry trade is put back on in a big way. I guess the recession has been canceled. LOL!:D

Bond yields were hinting at the ISM as they were up early in the morning. With new orders down, factory spending down, and the financials still down about 1.8%, this rally attempt is BS.

The BOE and ECB rate announcements will be on Thursday morning. We might see a cut from the BOE or maybe both, which means the dollar will rise.

F fund down 2 cents at the moment.
 
$1/share :laugh:

SCA exploring 'all strategic options'

By Andrew Edwards
Last update: 11:35 a.m. EST March 3, 2008

In a recent research note, Goldman Sachs analyst James Fotheringham said SCA's current business is worth practically nothing, noting the company's $3.3 billion in expected losses "exceeds SCA policyholders' surplus and reserves of $2.6 billion." Goldman, in the note, said it is dropping coverage of the company.http://www.marketwatch.com/news/sto...x?guid={06C0FC6C-C7BA-4F1C-8E9A-6E8FC640B6E4}
 
Hmmm...Something stinks about this bounce. So far, It appears to fun and games with Yen carry trade. The bond market is calling BS. I hope they're right.:worried:
 
More fun and games with Fanny and Freddie:

Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac in appraisal agreement
Giant mortgage buyers will buy only loans that meet tough new standards
By Robert Schroeder, MarketWatch
Last update: 12:14 p.m. EST March 3, 2008
WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- Mortgage-finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac agreed to buy only loans that meet certain tough requirements to stamp out mortgage fraud in an agreement announced Monday.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/sto...A-9FF3-48DE-93DC-80EEEEBF813A}&dist=sp_inthis

LOL!! Talk about shutting the barn door after the horses are gone.:rolleyes:
 
Hmmm...Something stinks about this bounce. So far, It appears to fun and games with Yen carry trade.

I'm getting worried about the F fund.

Japan may cap yen to stave off slump


By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, International Business Editor

Last Updated: 12:38am GMT 04/03/2008


Pressure is building in Japan for official intervention to cap the surging yen before it triggers a sharp industrial slowdown and tips the country back into slump.

News on sterling, the dollar, euro and other currencies
Read more from Ambrose Evans-Pritchard The currency has appreciated by 19pc against the dollar to ¥103(50p) since July as Japanese investors retreat from global markets.
Foreign hedge funds that borrowed at near zero-rates in Tokyo to chase higher yields abroad are scrambling to unwind "carry trade" positions, estimated at $1.4 trillion in its varied forms.
Fukoku Life, the giant life assurance company, said it planned to "pull out" of US bonds in preference for Japanese debt, a move underway across the Japanese corporate sector as the US yield advantage vanishes. "People are reconsidering the risks (in the US), and see the subprime problems as not being solved at all," said Yuuki Sakurai, the group's finance chief.http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2008/03/04/ccjapan104.xml
 
More BS. They're stalling.

Ambac decides against splitting

By Aline van Duyn and Ben White in New York
Published: March 4 2008 02:59 | Last updated: March 4 2008 02:59

Ambac, the troubled bond insurer, has decided against splitting in two as it completes a $2bn-$3bn recapitalisation, insiders said.
Under a recent proposal, Ambac, the second biggest bond insurer, or monoline, would have split its operations into a triple-A-rated municipal bond insurance business and a structured finance business with potentially lower ratings. A lower rating on the structured part of its business could have forced banks to reduce the value of guarantees on collateralised debt obligations and on derivative trades.

There was also the possibility of lawsuits by banks and other groups that bought insurance on CDOs and other structured products. Eight banks, led by Citigroup and UBS, which between them bought the most guarantees from Ambac, are together preparing to inject $2bn or more into the monoline, which has been racing to come up with fresh capital to avoid a sharp cut in its triple-A rating.

The capital infusion, which is likely to include other investors beside the banks, could be announced as early as Wednesday, people involved in the talks said. The deal is expected to result in Ambac remaining a single entity with a triple-A rating.

Although Ambac’s past guarantees are expected to remain together, its future business is likely to be different. Ambac announced late last week that it had slashed dividends and would stop providing insurance on structured finance deals for at least six months.

The moves, similar to those announced by MBIA, the biggest bond insurer, which has been grappling with a lack of investor confidence in its financial strength, are designed to preserve capital. Ambac said halting its structured business for six months would free up $600m in additional capital, for example.

Bond insurers have for decades provided triple-A stamps of approval to hundreds of billions of dollars of municipal debt. They have broadened their business to guarantee structured debt, including bonds backed by mortgages. The spikes in mortgage foreclosures this year have resulted in unexpected losses for bond insurers.

In spite of efforts by regulators to prevent downgrades of monolines, municipal bond yields have risen to historic highs compared with US Treasuries in the past week. This could lead to sharply higher borrowing costs for municipalities across the US.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2008http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/45dc462c-e980-11dc-8365-0000779fd2ac.html
 
Back
Top