What Happened To Global Warming, it's NOT!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sort by newest Sort by date
Here you see a Vulcan having her equipment adjusted...

tpolandtrip.jpg
 
so that's what the screws in the back for, i didn't know there was an access hatch back there, thought it was just a tattoo.
 
It was not only warm in the NW but very very very dry. Not looking forward to fire season this year.
 
I'm not jumping on the global warming (or not) bandwagon but do want to point something out.

I live in the Pacific Northwest. Yes, last winter was unbelievably mild. However, the year before I was on the tractor at least every third day in December and much of January snowblowing the drive so I could get to work. I've been out here for 6 year and it's never been anything like that since I got here. If I recall it was something over 8 feet of snow that winter.

My point is records work both ways. We might not have hit the record that year (don't recall) but, if we didn't, it was close.

Ever shoveled 4 and a half feet of snow off a 36X48 foot shop. It took me three days. I have picture of the shoveled snow reaching up to the the eaves of the shop (they're over 10' high).
 
And who recorded these temperature readings Nanook of the north? Yeah the jet stream gave us a big present from Canada and the warmer weather moved in above it. This isn't the first time this has happened and it's likely to happen again. Who ever that man was that is responsible for Global warming should be able to turn off that Volcano in Iceland that should be easy for folks that can change the weather of the whole world in such a short time.
So why am I skeptical of weather readings? Might be that the scientists that perpetrated that huge hoax a while back are the same ones that are making these forecasts? Call me sensitive but I don't like being lied to especially for political reasons.:cool:
I had to mow my lawn today, spring has sprung!!!:D I know it's early this year, right?:laugh:
 
72Zorad said:
I'm not jumping on the global warming (or not) bandwagon but do want to point something out.

I live in the Pacific Northwest. Yes, last winter was unbelievably mild. However, the year before I was on the tractor at least every third day in December and much of January snowblowing the drive so I could get to work. I've been out here for 6 year and it's never been anything like that since I got here. If I recall it was something over 8 feet of snow that winter.

My point is records work both ways. We might not have hit the record that year (don't recall) but, if we didn't, it was close.

Ever shoveled 4 and a half feet of snow off a 36X48 foot shop. It took me three days. I have picture of the shoveled snow reaching up to the the eaves of the shop (they're over 10' high).
Click to expand...

The year we got 120 inches cumulative (normal 8-10"), I had kids do the roof shovelling. Their dad (my employee) had died that fall of natural causes.

The mother (a co-worker) was left with 4 young ones, 3 of them just old enough to shovel the 2-3 feet of snow on the (low-pitch) roof. I figured the little bit extra cash in their pockets would help a bit that winter. I had to shovel the 150+ feet long, 20 wide area of driveway practically every other day that winter. REally good cumulative exercise for upper body.

I had a "tunnel" 6ft high between front door and carport by midwinter, got stuck 3x in driveway that winter despite all the shovelling-had to get pulled out by another vehicle (neighbors/friends) all 3 times. My own driveway! :rolleyes: That's the High Desert for you-high variability in ppt.
 
Last edited:
Meanwhile up in Alaska (Deadliest Catch) and Torino (Olympics), less snow than the usual. Maine reports maple syrup "crop" really small this winter due to not enough cold weather.

Down in Florida and here in the DC area, WE got the cold. Florida's first tomato crop was more or less a zero proposition. Second crop (from mid-April) was fine.

Weather patterns were bizzare this winter, and not the usual. If we have another winter like the last one, look out!
 
Not the Examiner, please. They are trying to become the free handout paper here in DC. Not many takers. Big headlines, but not much news. They are like the Miami Herald except they can't even be given away.
 
Climategate: CRU Was But the Tip of the Iceberg

By Marc Sheppard


Not surprisingly, the blatant corruption exposed at Britain’s premiere climate institute was not contained within the nation’s borders. Just months after the Climategate scandal broke, a new study has uncovered compelling evidence that our government’s principal climate centers have also been manipulating worldwide temperature data in order to fraudulently advance the global warming political agenda.

Not only does the preliminary report [PDF] indict a broader network of conspirators, but it also challenges the very mechanism by which global temperatures are measured, published, and historically ranked.

Last Thursday, Certified Consulting Meteorologist Joseph D’Aleo and computer expert E. Michael Smith appeared together on KUSI TV [Video] to discuss the Climategate -- American Style scandal they had discovered. This time out, the alleged perpetrators are the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS).

NOAA stands accused by the two researchers of strategically deleting cherry-picked, cooler-reporting weather observation stations from the temperature data it provides the world through its National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). D’Aleo explained to show host and Weather Channel founder John Coleman that while the Hadley Center in the U.K. has been the subject of recent scrutiny, “[w]e think NOAA is complicit, if not the real ground zero for the issue.”


And their primary accomplices are the scientists at GISS, who put the altered data through an even more biased regimen of alterations, including intentionally replacing the dropped NOAA readings with those of stations located in much warmer locales.

As you’ll soon see, the ultimate effects of these statistical transgressions on the reports which influence climate alarm and subsequently world energy policy are nothing short of staggering.

NOAA – Data In / Garbage Out [more]
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/01/climategate_cru_was_but_the_ti.html
 
NASA climate data worse than East Anglia CRU?

posted at 12:15 pm on March 31, 2010 by Ed Morrissey
That assessment doesn’t come from climate-change skeptics, but from NASA itself. A FOIA request from the Competitive Enterprise Institute revealed the internal e-mail evaluation, and also another problem with the East Anglia CRU data. It turns out that the databases maintained by NASA, UEA CRU, and the NOAA NCDC have self-endorsing mechanisms that mean that problems in one or more mean problems for all: [more]

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/03/31/nasa-climate-data-worse-than-east-anglia-cru/
 
Posted on February 1st, 2010
The Death of Global Warming

The global warming movement as we have known it is dead. Its health had been in steady decline during the last year as the once robust hopes for a strong and legally binding treaty to be agreed upon at the Copenhagen Summit faded away. By the time that summit opened, campaigners were reduced to hoping for a ‘politically binding’ agreement to be agreed that would set the stage for the rapid adoption of the legally binding treaty. After the failure of the summit to agree to even that much, the movement went into a rapid decline.
The movement died from two causes: bad science and bad politics.
After years in which global warming activists had lectured everyone about the overwhelming nature of the scientific evidence, it turned out that the most prestigious agencies in the global warming movement were breaking laws, hiding data, and making inflated, bogus claims resting on, in some cases, no scientific basis at all. This latest story in the London Times is yet another shocker; the IPCC’s claims that the rainforests were going to disappear as a result of global warming are as bogus and fraudulent as its claims that the Himalayan glaciers would melt by 2035. It seems as if a scare story could grab a headline, the IPCC simply didn’t care about whether it was reality-based.
Gore_Pachauri.jpg

With this in mind, ‘climategate’ — the scandal over hacked emails by prominent climate scientists — looks sinister rather than just unsavory. The British government has concluded that University of East Anglia, home of the research institute that provides the global warming with much of its key data, had violated Britain’s Freedom of Information Act when scientists refused to hand over data so that critics could check their calculations and methods. Breaking the law to hide key pieces of data isn’t just ’science as usual,’ as the global warming movement’s embattled defenders gamely tried to argue. A cover-up like that suggests that you indeed have something to conceal. [more]
http://blogs.the-american-interest.com/wrm/2010/02/01/the-death-of-global-warming/
 
FireWeatherMet said:
Yes...you have scientists who don't stand to make/lose millions or billions on the outcome.
Click to expand...
They make money doing this, why would they skew the data? You should be knowledgeable on the subject, did you work on these projects? Maybe you can explain the discrepancies?:)
 
Climate Science In Denial

Global warming alarmists have been discredited, but you wouldn't know it from the rhetoric this Earth Day.

"...it does appear that the public at large is becoming increasingly aware that something other than science is going on with regard to climate change, and that the proposed policies are likely to cause severe problems for the world economy. Climategate may thus have had an effect after all."

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...WSJ_hpp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsThird&mg=com-wsj
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

tsptalk
  • Article Article
Stocks bounce right back... Now what?
Replies
0
Views
171
tsptalk
tsptalk
tsptalk
  • Article Article
TSP Talk - Another late rally on Friday but rebounds have not been holding
Replies
0
Views
150
tsptalk
tsptalk
NewsFeeder
The Fed's biggest interest rate call in years happens Wednesday. Here's what to expec
Replies
0
Views
257
NewsFeeder
NewsFeeder
tsptalk
  • Article Article
TSP Talk - The historically bearish week gets off to a good start
Replies
0
Views
226
tsptalk
tsptalk
tsptalk
  • Article Article
TSP Talk - Climbing the great wall of worry, and China
Replies
0
Views
2K
tsptalk
tsptalk
Back
Top