grandma
Well-known member
Rant or not, it clarified the # jobs per outfit for me r/t the Johnson & Johnson job loss. Thank you.... But 6% lost, compared to 76% lost...
Anyway- that's my rant for the day.
The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com
Please read our AutoTracker policy on the IFT deadline and remaining active. Thanks!
$ - Premium Service Content (Info) | AutoTracker Monthly Winners | Is Gmail et al, Blocking Our emails?
Find us on: Facebook & X | Posting Copyrighted Material
Join the TSP Talk AutoTracker: How to Get Started | Login | Main AutoTracker Page
Rant or not, it clarified the # jobs per outfit for me r/t the Johnson & Johnson job loss. Thank you.... But 6% lost, compared to 76% lost...
Anyway- that's my rant for the day.
If 8,000 in one fell-swoop from one company is nothing like the number of jobs lost by other companies in the past, I wonder the ratio - the percentage.
Remember to get to 5% unemployment in the next 5 years we need to create a average of 250k jobs a month.
If 8,000 in one fell-swoop from one company is nothing like the number of jobs lost by other companies in the past, I wonder the ratio - the percentage. When smaller places of business are laying off that same percentage, though the actual number might be low, evenActually, layoffs appear to be slowing down. 8,000 is painful, but is nothing like the numbers we've been seeing over the last year.
Here's hoping we begin hiring back soon.
NEW YORK – Johnson & Johnson said Tuesday it will cut up to about 8,000 jobs...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091103/ap_on_bi_ge/us_johnson___johnson_restructuring
The 101-year old company is widely expected to clear that hurdle, and could file for bankruptcy as soon as this weekend. CIT warned last week that if investors did not support its restructuring efforts, it could end up filing for bankruptcy without a plan for how to fix itself. Exiting bankruptcy could take a long time and destroy much of the company, CIT's management said in a presentation.
Subdued unit labor costs will act to academically boost bottom line results, but for how long? What is good for corporate bottom lines is not good for employee wages, job growth, etc. We are currently seeing extremes in labor stats never seen before. Average hours worked hit a record low in June before recovering very slightly in July, as did the year over year change in aggregate weekly hours (the combo of wages and hours). We’re seeing record highs consistently month by month in average weeks of unemployment. And in terms of job growth so far in to the current decade, NEVER have we experienced anything like what you see in the table below. Without reaching for melodrama, I consider current decade payroll growth experience a secular game changer.
Decade
Total Growth In US Payroll Employment
1940's
38.0%
1950's
24.5
1960's
31.5
1970's
27.2
1980's
20.0
1990's
19.9
2000's
0.6
The number for the current decade will clearly be negative (a first) before the year is out. And this is what CEO’s are increasingly optimistic about? ....
If indeed CEO’s and CFO’s are feeling much better about the future of the economy and their business prospects, then we would expect to see a number of tangible real world events occur in the not too distant future. We would expect to see the hiring of temporary help pick up, and perhaps quite substantially and very soon. We would also expect to see corporate capital expenditures begin to advance. These are just two very simple examples of real world expressions of “confidence”. As always, it’s what the CEO's do, not what they say, that’s the important tell.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20603037&sid=aB8n6M8hGlwEBank of America Corp., the largest U.S. bank, may cut branches over the next three years because customers increasingly rely on the Internet and mobile phones to manage their accounts, an executive said.
The bank had 6,109 branches as of June 30, 22 fewer than a year earlier, according to a July 17 filing. Chief Executive Officer Kenneth Lewis has told investors he plans to shrink branches by 10 percent, the Wall Street Journal reported. Lewis’s comment came in response to a questioner and was hypothetical “as opposed to anything definitive.
I think they have 750 companies to royally screw right now....I guess we'll see.:suspicious:A complete POS company. CIT Group, thanks for nothing.