Safetyguy
Member
imported post
Just a suggestion for Pyriel and other trackers:
For the regular posters, why dowe need to break down the allocation in the L funds? Lets just say 100% L2030 and track it that way.
The main reason is that the daily "rebalancing" may have a real impact on returns -- and it will make the end result more accurate than they way you are doing it now.
Why not just track the L funds by the share price (which is clearly posted each day) not by its components (i.e. G F C S I). OK I know you may have to add a few columns to the spreadsheet but the math is the still same (based on change in share price). Remember, this wonderful website is dedicated to help people with TSP -- we shouldn't ignore the L funds and the TSP participants that use them.
Also and lastly, most people don't understand the quarterly allocation adjustment and are misposting the actual "by fund" percentage (e.g. it is different in October than it was for August).I really worry that they may not understand how the L funds work.
Just a suggestion for Pyriel and other trackers:
For the regular posters, why dowe need to break down the allocation in the L funds? Lets just say 100% L2030 and track it that way.
The main reason is that the daily "rebalancing" may have a real impact on returns -- and it will make the end result more accurate than they way you are doing it now.
Why not just track the L funds by the share price (which is clearly posted each day) not by its components (i.e. G F C S I). OK I know you may have to add a few columns to the spreadsheet but the math is the still same (based on change in share price). Remember, this wonderful website is dedicated to help people with TSP -- we shouldn't ignore the L funds and the TSP participants that use them.
Also and lastly, most people don't understand the quarterly allocation adjustment and are misposting the actual "by fund" percentage (e.g. it is different in October than it was for August).I really worry that they may not understand how the L funds work.