imported post
Not really, but, of course, it depends on how you play it (but that is true in trading anything).
Buying long is buying a stock with the anticipation of its going up in value.
Selling short is selling a stock with the anticipation of its going down in value.
In either case, with either trade, ONE of the two parties is WRONG. Both trades are fundamentally the same, only our view is askew.
Who has been wrong more often then right these past six months? Those buying long.
I do not have a lot of short-selling experience. However, I have sold my long positions when something went wrong with the stock and the price reversed quickly. It dawned on me, finally one day, "Duh! If I am selling this stock because I see it decreasing in value in the imminent future and do not want it, then why not sell short and profit from it, too?"
I did that with RHAT and TASR. I wish I'd thought of it sooner, I would have done it with APPX and SCSS. See those charts to see what I mean. A stock will fall more quickly than it will rise, so the profit opportunities are much more favourable.
RHAT: P/E at 360, "She's gonna blow!" Sell. Wait. SEC get curious, accounting questions raised. Stock drops. Sell short. Accounting statements for last 3 years changed. Close short position. Stock stabilises.
TASR: Pinhead journalists ignorantly blame TASR weapon for prison injuries. Close long, sell short. Stock drops 15% in one day, more following two days. Close short position when sell-off slows. CEO refutes journalists (which was a good read, a bit entertaining). Look for buying opportunity a la Warren Buffett.
It's like seeing a boxer get knocked square in the face with a killer punch and being able to instantly bet against him. Selling short can be a sure-thing. The bonus? haha, you don't even need cash to do it!