-
Welcome to the TSP Talk Forums forums.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, join our AutoTracker, and access many other special features. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. -
Please read our AutoTracker policy on the IFT deadline and remaining active. Thanks!
-
$ - Premium Service Content (Info) | AutoTracker Monthly Winners | Is Gmail et al, Blocking Our emails?
Find us on: Facebook & X | Posting Copyrighted Material
-
-
Join the TSP Talk AutoTracker: How to Get Started | Login | Main AutoTracker Page
-
The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com ...
Or you can now use TapaTalk again!
President
- Thread starter GGal
- Start date
Actually, budnipper1 came up with an interesting site. Check it out. http://www.koshland-science-museum.org/exhibitgcc/index.jsp
Per the National Academies (the owner of the site), Global Warming is happening and "Global warming affects many different facets of life on Earth. There will be winners and losers, even within a single region. But globally the losses are expected to far outweigh the benefits." (my emphasis)
Incidentally, I've done some work with the National Academies and they're anything but "tree huggers".
Therefore, risk takers will take a "wait and see approach" and conservatives will want to mitigate the negative consequences. Interestingly, on this issue, the risk takers are Conservatives and the conservatives are Liberals! Whoda think it! :laugh:
Per the National Academies (the owner of the site), Global Warming is happening and "Global warming affects many different facets of life on Earth. There will be winners and losers, even within a single region. But globally the losses are expected to far outweigh the benefits." (my emphasis)
Incidentally, I've done some work with the National Academies and they're anything but "tree huggers".
Therefore, risk takers will take a "wait and see approach" and conservatives will want to mitigate the negative consequences. Interestingly, on this issue, the risk takers are Conservatives and the conservatives are Liberals! Whoda think it! :laugh:
FUTURESTRADER
Active member
JTH
Well-known member
I would never be one to disrespect my President. Having said that, I’m comforted in the knowledge that our government has Term Limits. Although I don’t think he has a chance, Ron Paul would get my vote on the Republican side. On the conservative Democrat side, my vote would go for Bill Richardson.
If Hillary gets the nomination, I will do everything in my power to support the other candidate.
If Hillary gets the nomination, I will do everything in my power to support the other candidate.
budnipper1
Active member
The election will decide between Hillary(the terrible )and whoever becomes the final Republican candidate. My choice, as I have already stated, is Fred Thompson. And not just because he hails (originally) from Lawrenceburg, Tennessee. (my home state)
Just my opinion.
Dodge_Em
Member
grandma
Well-known member
Will she, her husband, and their cronies, return all the things they stole, took with them when they left the White House on their previous service? And will they reimburse us taxpayers for the trashing & damages they did to the rooms as they walked out the doors? Will they up and fire whole departments so as to create openings for their New Yorker buddies?
I am of the belief that those actions verified their true nature before they even went to DC. Why would we, and do we really want to, return folks with such unprincipled character to our White House?
Yes, I voted for them the first time round, that was enough.
(at what point after Grand Larceny can the term Felon be used?)
budnipper1
Active member
BeaverState
Member
Much as I love people from Arkansas - Hill & Billy won't be getting my vote.:toung:
This is a fun site
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/index.asp?cycle=2008
Don't forget to check the selected industries to see who's buttering your favorite
http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/index.asp?cycle=2008
Don't forget to check the selected industries to see who's buttering your favorite
http://www.politicalcompass.org/usprimaries2007
And then there is the view that there isn't much difference between them
And then there is the view that there isn't much difference between them
thamm
Member
camper65
Member
Which would you rather have?
An idealist? (We know who they are!)
A crook? (Who ever she is!)
Or 4 more years of dogma, cronyism, and ineptitude!
Lets see,
An idealist can’t get anything done. (Carter)
Enough is enough of what we have now. (Cant see much better from that side of the street!!!)
Guess I’ll take the crook, at least a crook knows that they have to give you some in order
To get!
An idealist? (We know who they are!)
A crook? (Who ever she is!)
Or 4 more years of dogma, cronyism, and ineptitude!
Lets see,
An idealist can’t get anything done. (Carter)
Enough is enough of what we have now. (Cant see much better from that side of the street!!!)
Guess I’ll take the crook, at least a crook knows that they have to give you some in order
To get!
James48843
Well-known member
I say we draft Ebb to run.
EBB FOR PRESIDENT.
(At least that way, we can attack that nasty deficient thingy...)
EBB FOR PRESIDENT.
(At least that way, we can attack that nasty deficient thingy...)
Frixxxx
Moderator
Wow! if you add up all the money's raised to get these people noticed:
$296,435,627
All that for a $400,000 a year job.
hmmm.....
Similar threads
