The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com
Please read our AutoTracker policy on the IFT deadline and remaining active. Thanks!
$ - Premium Service Content (Info) | AutoTracker Monthly Winners | Is Gmail et al, Blocking Our emails?
Find us on: Facebook & X | Posting Copyrighted Material
Join the TSP Talk AutoTracker: How to Get Started | Login | Main AutoTracker Page
The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com ...
Or you can now use TapaTalk again!
After one round of plastic surgery from which he was extremely disappointed to find that he still looked the same, one of the doctors suggested that he remove his fingerprints as a way to escape being detected. Dillinger liked this idea and elected to undergo the painful process of obliterating his fingerprints. Dillinger was not the first criminal to come up with that idea. In 1933, “Handsome Jack” Klutas had attempted to file down the small ridges on his fingers, but he ultimately failed. Two of Kate “Ma” Barker’s clan, Alvin “Creepy” Karpis and Ma’s son Freddy, decided to remove their fingerprints as well, so they hired mob physician Joseph P. Moran to do the job. Moran was inexperienced in this procedure and repeatedly hacked and knifed at their prints until the gangsters couldn’t bear any more pain, but when their fingers finally healed, the fingerprint ridges grew back to their original patterns.
I, personally, do not trust an entity I do not know with even more information. As far as I can tell, my bank information is not in my security clearance.
Maybe the best thing any of us can really do is change our bank (or our account numbers), do the same for credit cards, and do whatever you can to make other identifiable targets different than documented in your security clearance. Basically, make the security clearance info obsolete.
Luckily, national espionage probably doesn't key around bank accounts and the like. Nations would be more interested in leveraging individuals. I feel sorry for those who properly disclosed issues that can now be leveraged.
But if on the other hand you have ever been known to browse for some adult entertainment, you could be the next target for hackers.
The warning comes from software engineer Brett Thomas, who said on his blog: ‘If you are watching/viewing porn online in 2015, even in Incognito mode, you should expect that at some point your porn viewing history will be publicly released and attached to your name.’
He said: ‘At any time, somebody could post a website that allows you to search anybody by email or Facebook username and view their porn browsing history. All that’s needed are two nominal data breaches and an enterprising teenager that wants to create havoc.
‘I think the next big internet privacy crisis could expose the private and potentially embarrassing personal data of regular people to their neighbors.’
And while I know I shouldn't feel this way or say this: I still feel the people responsible for allowing this to happen should be publically acknowledged for their incompetence and made to suffer in some meaningful way.
I nor anyone I have asked has received such a letter. We all got breached. What do you suppose that means? They haven't gotten to sending a letter to us yet or some are at more peril?
PO
How is this different from the CSID credit monitoring program that I already signed up for, why another one?
How is this different from the CSID credit monitoring program that I already signed up for, why another one?