News From GovExec on TSP

Employee groups back automatic TSP enrollment, new default fund

By Brittany R. Ballenstedt bballenstedt@govexec.com June 12, 2007

A federal Thrift Savings Plan advisory panel decided Tuesday to back legislation allowing for automatic employee enrollment in the plan and to change the default fund for indecisive investors.
At a biannual meeting of the Employee Thrift Advisory Council, representatives from labor unions and other federal employee groups expressed support for the proposed changes to the 401(k)-style program on the grounds that both would be beneficial to participants.
Under the 2006 Pension Protection Act, Congress gave public and private sector organizations the ability to offer an "opt out" approach to 401(k) plans. The law allows organizations to automatically enroll employees into such plans unless they indicate otherwise.

TSP officials originally designed the proposal to offer a 90-day period for employees to opt out. But TSP Executive Director Gregory Long said agency responses to this time frame were negative, triggering officials to modify the proposal to provide enrollment immediately. Employees could later choose to get out, he said.

Long said the default contribution for automatic enrollment would be 3 percent, largely because employee contributions are matched fully up to 3 percent.

A representative from the National Treasury Employees Union indicated that the legislation should give TSP officials the flexibility of changing the default contribution, should 3 percent not prove to be the best option. "After some experiences down the road, you may have to go back to Congress and get a legislative change," he said. "That way, you don't have to go back to Congress if you discover that 3 percent isn't the right level."

Another proposed change involves switching the default fund for investors who do not express a preference from the less-risky government securities fund to the TSP's life cycle options, which invest in a more conservative mix of funds as employees near retirement.
TSP officials noted that employees who do express a preference are most likely to choose the L funds, warranting the change. But representatives of the groups indicated that changing the default fund would require increased outreach to alert employees to the risks of investing in the L funds.

"We will let people know that if they don't make a choice, [money] will go into the L funds, and that does involve some risk," Long said. "The best long-term effects are in the L Funds."

Representatives unanimously agreed that the default fund proposal would be beneficial. "Looking back on it now, knowing the advantage of diversifying investments, I support taking the default to the age-adjusted L funds," said Richard Strombotne of the Senior Executives Association.

Meanwhile, TSP officials and group representatives agreed to hold off on three other potential changes -- the addition of a Roth option, the allowance of contributions from bonuses and the addition of restrictions on where funds are invested.
Long indicated that offering the Roth option, which would allow employees to make after-tax contributions, would benefit a very small percentage of participants. "If you expect your tax rates in retirement are going to be higher when you retire than now, then it makes sense," Long said. "But that's not most people."

Long said he believed that given the internal costs of such an option to the TSP, and some agency concerns over increased payroll costs associated with the Roth option, it would be best to "wait a few years and revisit the issue at that time."

The president's 2008 budget request included a proposal that would allow employees to contribute bonus money to the TSP. "I don't see a lot of benefit for employees having this particular benefit right now, given the fact that they go right up to the [Internal Revenue Service] limit, which is $15,500 with a catch-up provision of another $5,000 for those age 50 and above," Strombotne said.

The council also determined that six different pieces of legislation recently introduced to divest funds that support terrorism in Iran and genocide in Darfur, Sudan, were not in the best interest of all participants. "Putting restrictions on funds of where employees should invest their money is not our business," said James Sauber, chief of staff of the National Association of Letter Carriers and chairman of the council.

Officials and employee representatives agreed to revisit the issue of divesting funds. In the meantime, they said, employees can make their own choices as to where to invest. "Just like if you don't like doing business at a particular store, you don't go there," said Richard Brown, president of the National Federation of Federal Employees.

The council also re-elected Sauber as chairman and Brown as vice chairman. Both are four-year appointments.

TSP spokesman Tom Trabucco said officials would discuss the automatic enrollment and default fund proposals with the TSP board next week. "We should get things rolling in the near term," he said.

Source: http://govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=37164&dcn=todaysnews
 
Survivor Savings

By Brittany R. Ballenstedt bballenstedt@govexec.com June 14, 2007

There's little doubt that the Thrift Savings Plan is a highly valued and attractive investment program for federal employees. But should participants pass away, their spouses might not see the full benefits.

Currently, a surviving spouse beneficiary must either accept the assets of the TSP account as a lump sum, with the tax consequences, or have the assets transferred to a rollover Individual Retirement Account. But one representative of the TSP's Employee Thrift Advisory Council is hoping to change that rule.


Richard Strombotne -- who represents the Senior Executives Association at ETAC meetings -- is seeking the council's support for a proposal that would allow spouses of deceased federal workers to leave their savings in the plan.


"Because the TSP is run so efficiently, the administrative costs are so low," Strombotne said. "Even though the surviving spouse can move the funds, there is a loss of economic benefit in that process. It's a disadvantage for a surviving spouse to find another place to invest the money."


The TSP is not the only retirement fund with such a rule, however. Regulations governing private sector 401(k) plans are so burdensome that the managers of these accounts often decline to offer surviving spouses the benefit of leaving savings there, Strombotne said.


But the regulations governing private sector IRAs are such that the transfer of ownership to a surviving spouse is relatively easy, making that procedure a routine action, Strombotne noted. He said he believes that the same "ease of transfer" associated with private sector IRAs could be applied to the TSP.


Richard Brown, president of the National Federation of Federal Employees and vice chairman of ETAC, said Wednesday that he fears implementing the proposal would increase the administrative costs of the TSP. "That would be an administrative burden on a plan that would make everyone pay for the benefit of a few," he said. "I wouldn't support it based on that."


Typically, the TSP costs participants less than two basis points, or two cents for every $100 invested. Comparable private sector plans can cost 50 to 80 basis points.


Strombotne first offered the proposal to the advisory council in November 2004. Former TSP Executive Director Gary Amelio wasn't in favor, arguing that such a rule change was outside the TSP's hands and would require congressional action.


New Executive Director Gregory Long said Tuesday that TSP officials would look into the idea but could not promise any further action. "What strikes me as a little strange now, is this is an employer-sponsored plan," Long said. "This would make an account sponsored by someone who is not an employee of the federal government."


The proposal would need to generate support from all members of ETAC, which is composed of representatives from labor unions and other federal employee groups. The council could then propose or endorse legislation that would allow the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board to transfer ownership to the surviving spouse beneficiary.


If you have not designated a beneficiary for your TSP account, you can download the TSP-3 form from the TSP Web site, or obtain the form from your agency's personnel office. But keep in mind that there are different rules governing non-spouse beneficiaries, who are subject to 10 percent withholding.


Non-spouses can defer paying taxes by transferring their death benefit payments to an inherited IRA or by taking required minimum payments based on their own life expectancy. Still, the rules governing inherited IRAs are complicated, and the TSP recommends you discuss this benefit with your tax adviser or IRA provider as you do your estate or retirement planning.



Source: Govexec.com

http://govexec.com/dailyfed/0607/061407pb.htm
 
TSP board rejects divestiture proposals

By Brittany R. Ballenstedt

The board that oversees the federal employee Thrift Savings Plan on Tuesday expressed strong opposition to legislative proposals that would require divestiture of companies that do business in countries supporting genocide and terror.

At their monthly meeting, members of the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board expressed concern over the precedent such proposals could create. They argued that since its creation, the TSP has acted only in the best interest of participants and has resisted efforts to advance political objectives or social goals.

Several recently-introduced pieces of legislation seek to ensure that TSP investments do not support genocide in the Darfur region of Sudan or terrorism. Board members said these proposed measures "pressure the TSP to reconsider its neutrality on political and social issues," a stand the plan has refused to take since its creation.

Full story: http://www.govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=37240&dcn=e_gvet

SWSOP
 
http://govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=37482&dcn=todaysnews

TSP urges Congress to back two legislative proposals

By Brittany R. Ballenstedt bballenstedt@govexec.com
July 16, 2007

The board that oversees the federal employee Thrift Savings Plan has sent two new proposals to Congress, urging lawmakers to adopt legislation that would allow automatic employee enrollment and to change the default fund for indecisive investors.

At a monthly meeting Monday, TSP Legislative Director Tom Trabucco said that while the proposals have been sent to Congress, no action is expected before lawmakers adjourn for the August recess.

"We're off and running," Trabucco said. "But I don't really expect much attention during this three-week period."

The automatic enrollment proposal builds off the 2006 Pension Protection Act, which gave organizations the ability to offer an "opt-out" approach to 401(k) plans. The law allows organizations to automatically enroll employees into such plans unless they indicate otherwise.

Under the proposal, new employees would contribute 3 percent of their paycheck to the TSP by default if they did not designate otherwise, but would have 90 days to withdraw their money. After that, withdrawals would be restricted but employees would be able to halt contributions.

The second proposal would switch the default fund for investors who do not express a preference from the less-risky government securities (G) fund to the TSP's life cycle options, which invest in a more conservative mix of funds as employees near retirement.

At the biannual meeting of the Employee Thrift Advisory Council last month, union and employee representatives agreed that the default proposal would be beneficial, especially to younger participants.

Trabucco said Monday that it is too early to tell whether Congress will take up the proposed changes before the end of the year. "While the issues are not new to the Congress, their schedule appears to be quite full and the calendar is really quite short," he said.

Trabucco added, however, that the House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on the Federal Workforce has alerted TSP officials of an Aug. 2 hearing to discuss federal employee benefits. Trabucco said Gregory Long, executive director of the TSP, has been invited to testify.
 
TSP divestiture proposals stall in committee

By Brittany R. Ballenstedt bballenstedt@govexec.com

July 30, 2007

Two legislative provisions that would have affected the federal employee Thrift Savings Plan by urging fiduciaries to offer socially responsible investment options stalled at the committee level.

The provisions were removed from two major bills -- H.R. 180 by Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., and H.R. 2347, sponsored by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass. -- affecting investment in companies that do business in countries supporting genocide and terror. The House will vote on both bills Tuesday morning, according to Steve Adamske, a spokesman for Frank.

Adamske said Monday that the TSP provisions were removed largely because the Financial Services Committee does not have jurisdiction over the federal retirement plan.

A provision in Lee's bill that would have required research on the TSP's holdings in companies that do business in the Darfur region of Sudan was removed in a House Financial Services Committee markup last week.

The language would have required the Government Accountability Office to submit a report that contains the names of companies with such business interests, and the amount the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board, which oversees the TSP, invests in such companies.

Frank's measure would have urged the TSP to offer a terror-free investment option to federal workers, though it fell short of requiring such a fund. That provision was removed during a committee markup in May.

A similar bill (S. 1430) sponsored by two presidential candidates -- Sens. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., and Barack Obama, D-Ill. -- still includes a provision that would urge the terror-free investment option to be offered in the TSP. That bill sits in Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee.

Another bill (S. 970), sponsored by Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Ore., would require the TSP board to report to Congress on any investment in entities that engage in business with Iran. That bill sits in the Senate Finance Committee.

In June, the board supported a motion urging Congress to oppose legislation that would impose restrictions on the TSP. Board members have expressed concern over the precedent such proposals could establish, holding that Congress' original intent in creating the plan was to shield it from political and social influence.

According to a recent analysis by consulting firm Ennis Knupp & Associates, divesting the TSP's international (I) fund, which holds $24.5 billion in assets, of non-U.S. companies conducting business in Sudan would potentially result in the annual loss of 5.1 basis points, or 51 cents per $1,000 invested. This would translate to $12.5 million in additional costs annually. Divestment also would result in a one-time transition cost of $30 million, according to the analysis.

Source: http://govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=37605&dcn=todaysnews
 
Officials to shore up TSP against transaction influxes

By Brittany R. Ballenstedt bballenstedt@govexec.com August 20, 2007

The current system that processes transactions under the Thrift Savings Plan is capable of handling increased activity from market fluctuations, but will need to be updated, TSP officials said Monday.

At a monthly Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board meeting, officials overseeing the 401(k)-style retirement plan said that increased volatility in the markets last week led to increased transfers out of the plan's three equity funds -- the common stocks (C), small- and mid-sized companies (S) and international (I) funds. TSP Chief Investment Officer Tracey Ray said the movement generated $9.5 million in trading costs on Thursday alone.

Plan officials said they launched a comprehensive review of the processing system in March, following a market plunge that caused about 10 percent of I Fund investors to make changes.

Executive Director Gregory Long said that analysis and a separate review conducted by IBM found the current mainframe adequate to handle influxes of transactions. But he added that officials are developing a detailed budget plan to update the system and ensure preparedness for major market movements.

"It's not only how we plan for daily events but also for macro events," Long said. "We have put a lot of thought into our budget in planning for those particular events."
TSP officials said in April that the transaction processing system normally operates at about three-fifths of its capacity. Should the market fall significantly, the system could be turned on to full capacity, allowing it to handle four to five times the volume of transactions. Any that exceeded that amount could be delayed.

Long said officials will unveil the budget plan, review fiscal 2007 expenditures and approve fiscal 2008 funding at next month's meeting.

"It's a very tough time to be an investor," FRTIB Chairman Andrew Saul said. "We don't control the markets, but we do have to make sure the participants' money is being handled well and that they have confidence in what we're doing."


Source:
http://govexec.com/story_page.cfm?articleid=37813&dcn=todaysnews
 
This was from Mike Causey this am...Higher fees for TSP participants that exceed set number of IFTs in a year.

"Are sit-tight-grin-and-bear-it TSP investors subsidizing coworkers who frequently move money in and out of their C, S and I funds?
Transfer traffic has increased since March when the market tanked, then rebounded to record highs, then headed south again.
Should the costs associated with frequent IFTs (inter-fund transfers) be part of any increase in administrative fees to all investors?
Or should there be higher fees for investors who exceed a limited number of IFTs per year?
That is one of the issues being studied by the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board which is also developing a long-range plan to handle problems the TSP might face due to a large number of IFTs, terrorist attacks or weather events.
Disaster-proofing TSP operations will be the subject of a review TSP officials expect to make public within the next few weeks. The issue of whether and how much to charge so-called heavy-users is also under study. On Black Monday, a then-record $1.7 billion (that's billion with a 'B') left the stock funds. Most of the transfers were out of the international fund (I-fund) which, along with the small-cap S-fund had been producing the best returns."
 
This was from Mike Causey this am...Higher fees for TSP participants that exceed set number of IFTs in a year.

"Are sit-tight-grin-and-bear-it TSP investors subsidizing coworkers who frequently move money in and out of their C, S and I funds?
Transfer traffic has increased since March when the market tanked, then rebounded to record highs, then headed south again.
Should the costs associated with frequent IFTs (inter-fund transfers) be part of any increase in administrative fees to all investors?
Or should there be higher fees for investors who exceed a limited number of IFTs per year?
That is one of the issues being studied by the Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board which is also developing a long-range plan to handle problems the TSP might face due to a large number of IFTs, terrorist attacks or weather events.
Disaster-proofing TSP operations will be the subject of a review TSP officials expect to make public within the next few weeks. The issue of whether and how much to charge so-called heavy-users is also under study. On Black Monday, a then-record $1.7 billion (that's billion with a 'B') left the stock funds. Most of the transfers were out of the international fund (I-fund) which, along with the small-cap S-fund had been producing the best returns."


Great... :rolleyes:
 
The article also says:

The federal TSP has the lowest administrative fees in the mutual fund business. Congress intended it to be that way, partly to help feds invest for retirement and partly because members of Congress and their staffs participate in the TSP too.

IMO, if it affects Congress' pocketbooks personally, it won't happen.

http://www.federalnewsradio.com/?nid=7
 
Oreo, Think about the reverse of what you said.

I am betting in the members of congress, just like the general TSP population, that the majority of participants don't make many IFTs if any during the year. Therfore the majority of participants/congress would choose to increase fees for the minority therin reducing the fees for the majority.

In other words if the people that do numerous IFTs have to have a fee assessed to help cover the costs it would reduce the costs for the buy & hold crowd. The overall costs stay the same, just more would be assessed to the frequent traders. Which would mean less fees to the other participants.

My 2 cents.
 
Jack,

You have a point but the problem is that we really don't know exactly how many participants make IFT's during the year. It could be a lot or it could be a little. Unless we have the figures, we really don't know. However, we do know that the TSP board has been discussing capacity lately during volatility surges and I'm guessing more and more people are monitoring their accounts as the economy problems hit the mainstream media more and more.

My point is, I think it needs some analysis. I'm old enough to remember when you could only make a change once a month and the system was changed so people could have a chance to grow their funds. However, now that people are using it, they want to charge for it. I agree its not fair for the buy and holders to pay for the frequent traders. However, will charging for it harm people's accounts. I don't know but I think if it is done, it needs to be done right.

Also, my gut feeling is that not enough people are using the L-funds and this is intended to make more people users of the L-fund. Do I know this for a fact. No. But this is my suspicion.

All this being said, Jack, I don't disagree with you but I just hope that if this is done, it is well thought out. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

Oreo
 
Vectorman - I totally agree with you. I would too. In fact, I would not mind paying a little extra to get rid of the FV. That would be nice too.
 
Oreo, I was around when you could only change once a month also. It is also a bit hypocritical that the L funds rebalance each & every day(ie. make trades) but the board potentially wants to charge you and I if we trade...I agree with all you say. The board is slow to act but most decisions they make are well thought out.

Vector, I am from W TN how about you?
 
...increased volatility in the markets last week led to increased transfers out of the plan's three equity funds -- the common stocks (C), small- and mid-sized companies (S) and international (I) funds.

Instead of citing an arguement about fees and deadlines, I see a positive spin on this statement. If so many Government workers have liquidated their holdings and fled to the G fund, the bottom of this correction is imminent. Dumb money is a great contrarian indicator to the market.

A confirmation is the newsflash a co worker of mine gave me regarding Countrywide Financial yesterday. I just sat there in awe and acted as if the news was fresh off the press while thinking, "Let me know when you're getting into the market, that's when I'll be getting out."
 
from Govexec.com:
September biggest month (Thanks to Ebb?)
http://govexec.com :
----------------------------------
TSP officials note major growth in plan
By Brittany R. Ballenstedt bballenstedt@govexec.com October 15, 2007

Assets in the Thrift Savings Plan grew $6.4 billion in September, the largest increase this year, officials with the retirement savings program said Monday.

At a monthly Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board meeting, officials overseeing the 401(k)-style plan said last month's growth brought total assets to $231 billion. September's growth was comparable to that of the top 20 private sector 401(k) plans, said Gregory Long, the plan's executive director.

"Over $5 billion [of the growth] was made because of the increase in participants' investments," said Andrew Saul, chairman of the board. "That's huge."

In February, the board predicted that the plan's assets could grow to $300 billion in three years. Since then, the plan's investments have increased by $25 billion.

TSP Executive Director Gregory Long said for the year to date, the TSP cost participants one basis point, or one cent for every $100 invested. Comparable private sector plans can cost 50 to 80 basis points. Come December, however, the plan's cost will likely increase to two basis points, Long said.

Tracey Ray, chief investment officer for the TSP, said there was an increase in transfers last month, specifically with $2.7 billion transferred out of the fixed income bonds (F) fund. Over a 12-month period, participants transferred the most money out of the international (I) fund, moving $19 billion.

Ray cautioned against transferring among funds, noting that increased volatility in the markets in August caused many participants to move out of the plan's three equity funds -- the common stocks (C), small- and mid-sized companies (S) and international (I) funds. As a result, many participants missed out on a great deal of growth in September and October, Ray said.

Long said plan officials expect to release a report at next month's meeting that highlights the causes and costs of increased transfers among funds.

Meanwhile, TSP Legislative Director Tom Trabucco said the Congressional Budget Office is developing a cost estimate for two legislative proposals that plan officials sent to Congress in late August. The proposals would allow automatic employee enrollment and change the default fund for indecisive investors.

"Hopefully the cost estimate will be low, which will be good in terms of getting the legislation through this session of Congress," Trabucco said.

Officials also noted that last week's move to replace participants' Social Security numbers with new account numbers was successful, adding that they had anticipated the large number of calls from participants saying they did not receive or had lost their new numbers. Pamela Jeanne Moran, TSP's director of participant services, said the plan has reissued 99,000 account numbers to participants.

"There have been some complaints," Long said. "People now have a 13-digit number that they have to remember. But that's the way of the world."
 
Back
Top