NASA data blows gaping hole in Global Warming

Interesting. Thanks for sharing. I love NASA. Do they have an agenda though? You always have to question research to look for bias. I don't think they are.
 
Interesting. Thanks for sharing. I love NASA. Do they have an agenda though? You always have to question research to look for bias. I don't think they are.
When reading the `comments' to the article it is amazing what bias and predjudices get revealed!
 
NASA's agenda: remember, James Hansen (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Hansen) works for NASA. However, the article referred to humidity and (cirrus) cloud coverage. These two parameters have always been handled empirically in the models and have always been sources of uncertainty. The debate is far from over.
 
Back
Top