McDuck's Account Talk

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Greg's Account Talk

I just went 100% S-fund.

I didn't want to use my only IFT this early in the month.

I'm hoping for a 3% bump up tomorrow and get out. That kind of thinking has been bad for me the last 2 months.


I just got my IFT confirmation email. I went 100% C-fund. I originally went with C but changed my mind to S but that IFT request must have been after the deadline :confused: (I had a rough day at work today).
 
Re: Greg's Account Talk


275047.full.gif



61501.full.gif


72000.full.gif



135302.full.gif






 
Re: Greg's Account Talk

I just got my IFT confirmation email. I went 100% C-fund. I originally went with C but changed my mind to S but that IFT request must have been after the deadline :confused: (I had a rough day at work today).


Hey that's totally understandable... :D

Only the extremely daring would jump in S - right off the bat


I would have gone C Fund myself - but I think of pussy willows instead of majestic bold Oaks :):D
 
Last edited:
Re: Greg's Account Talk

Hey Greg,
We've got about 2 hours to go :D

Usually I'm pretty good at guageing how the Markets will end by this time


C - will be the winner - so for a ONE DAY - you should come out winning for sure

Tomorrow and possibly the next day - should be the biggest gainers if this moves as momentum is now suggesting.

Anyway - GL
 
Re: Greg's Account Talk

http://blog.al.com/spotnews/2009/03/alabama_prepaid_college_tuitio.html

Alabama prepaid college tuition program value tumbles 45%

Posted by Stan Diel -- Birmingham News March 03, 2009 6:00 AM

Officials with the state's pre-paid college tuition pro gram are meeting with officials at the University of Ala*bama and Auburn University to try to strike a deal under which tuition payments could continue.

The trust fund backing Alabama's prepaid college tuition program has lost more than 45 percent of its value in a year and a half -- including 20 percent lost to the recent stock market collapse -- and program managers are scrambling to find ways to keep paying students' tuition.

The money paid into the fund
by the parents and grandparents of thousands of current and future students is uninsured, authorities said Monday.

The Alabama Prepaid Affordable College Tuition trust fund currently has assets totaling $484 million, said Gregory Fitch, chairman of the Alabama Commission on Higher Education. In September 2007 the fund had assets totaling $899 million, according to program documents. In September 2008 the fund totaled $606 million.

Officials with the office of state Treasurer Kay Ivey, which manages the program, referred telephone calls seeking comment to Fitch, a member of the program's board of directors. Ivey late last week mailed a letter to the 48,000 families with money in the fund warning that it was in trouble.

Officials with the PACT program are meeting with officials at the University of Alabama and Auburn University to try to strike a deal under which tuition payments could continue, the letter said. Most participants in the program attend those universities, or plan to.

"This process will take several weeks, and we ask your patience while we fully explore this opportunity," the letter said.

Asked whether the program might simply fail, Fitch on Monday said: "That's a difficult question."

It wasn't clear Monday whether the trust fund's assets are sufficient to meet its obligations. PACT officials expect to know more within two weeks, and will post updates every Friday by 2 p.m. on a new Web site, www.800alapact.com, Fitch said.

In addition to the reeling stock market, the program is in trouble because tuition is rising faster than planners had expected, and because of a spike in the number of participants enrolling in college from 2006 through 2010, Fitch said.

The prepaid tuition plan offers parents an opportunity to essentially lock in current in-state college tuition rates for children who won't be enrolled in college for many years. For example, the family of a first-grader last year, expected to enroll in college in 2020, could have bought four years of tuition beginning in 2020 for a lump-sum payment of $24,725.

Not bank deposits

Alternatives allowing payments in monthly installments also are offered, and participants can apply the average in-state tuition in Alabama toward tuition at colleges in other states.

But, as disclosure documents make clear, paying for prepaid tuition is not the same as paying for tuition. The money, which the state invests in stocks and bonds through the trust fund, is not insured like a bank deposit, and the state makes no guarantees that it will still be there when the student is ready for college.

"The Trust Fund and investments under PACT are not bank deposits, and are not debt obligations of, or insured or guaranteed by the FDIC, the State, the Board, the Treasurer, the PACT Program, or any other state or federal governmental agency," a disclosure document says. "None of these entities or persons has any legal or moral obligation to ensure the ultimate payout with the respect to the purchase of a PACT Contract."

States back their prepaid tuition plans to varying degrees. While some offer no assurances, like Alabama, some provide collateral and promise to make tuition payments even if the programs are discontinued.

Florida, for example, guarantees participants within five years of college enrollment that it will pay their tuition even if it ends its prepaid program, and promises to return investments made by others, even if the fund's assets aren't sufficient to do so.

Charlie Haines, owner of Charles D. Haines LLC, a Birmingham investment firm that manages about $500 million, said questionable investment decisions made by the state led him to steer his clients away from Alabama's program more than 15 years ago. He encourages his clients to consider other states' programs, he said.

'Too aggressive'

Haines said Alabama's assumed rate of return is unrealistic, and requires too much risk. Fund managers also haven't incorporated enough hedging investments to lessen the impact of a downturn in the market, he said.

"We just felt that (the fund) was too aggressive," he said.

According to an actuarial report on the fund filed by the state in January 2008, the fund's managers then assumed a rate of return of about 8 percent until 2013, and 8.5 percent after that. That report also found that the fund's liabilities exceeded its assets by about $20 million.

According to fund documents, 42 percent of its assets, as of March 2008, were invested in large market capitalization domestic stocks, 9 percent in small market capitalization domestic stocks, 21 percent in international stocks, 26 percent in domestic fixed-income securities and 2 percent in cash.

Efforts to reach officials with associations and trade groups that monitor education funds were unsuccessful Monday -- their Washington offices were closed by a storm making its way up the East Coast. But a spot check of some other states' funds found rate-of-return expectations between 7 percent and 8 percent.
 
Re: Greg's Account Talk

S&P futures are currently at 704 down 9 which would give back today's 1-day blip.
 
Re: Greg's Account Talk

http://money.cnn.com/2009/03/05/news/companies/GM_10K/index.htm

GM: 'Substantial doubt' about continuing

Automaker's annual report says it hopes to get $7.7 billion from the government to remain viable.

By Ben Rooney, CNNMoney.com staff writer
March 5, 2009: 6:51 AM ET

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- General Motors Corp. said Thursday that it hopes to get additional loans from the government and that there is "substantial doubt" about the automaker's ability to remain a "going concern."

GM hopes to receive an additional $7.7 billion in federal aid, which would bring its total debt to the government to $30 billion by 2011, the company said in its annual report.

"The failure to obtain sufficient funding from the US government or governments outside the United States may require us to shrink or terminate operations or seek reorganization for certain subsidiaries outside the United States," the report said.

"If we fail to obtain sufficient funding for any reason, we would not be able to continue as a going concern and could potentially be forced to seek relief under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code," GM added.

Looking ahead, the company said it expects auto sales to remain weak. GM (GM, Fortune 500) said Tuesday sales fell 53% in February.

"Sales volumes may decline more severely or take longer to recover than we expect, however, and if they do, our results of operations and financial condition and the success of the Viability Plan will be materially adversely affected," the report said.
 
Re: Greg's Account Talk

S&P 500 futures currently at 696.80 which is back where it was at Monday closing.
 
Re: Greg's Account Talk

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20090307.RMARKET07/TPStory/Business

flag-business.png


MARKETS

Investors see hope slip away on U.S. missteps


DAVID PARKINSON
March 7, 2009

Barack Obama won the U.S. presidency on a campaign that was all about hope. Six weeks of missteps and relentless market declines later, investors are wondering where the hope has gone.


Despite a late-day rally that pushed U.S. indexes higher yesterday, the S&P 500 still lost 7 per cent this week, while the Dow Jones industrial average shed 6.2 per cent, making it the worst week yet in what has been a very bad 2009 for stocks. The U.S. market had fallen in eight of nine weeks in 2009, wiping out about one-quarter of the market's value since the year began; Canadian stocks have also been battered, losing 15.5 per cent in the year to date.

"We've noticed that every time a politician starts to talk, the market starts to fall," said Bill Ryder, market strategist at Riverfront Investment Group, an advisory and fund management firm in Richmond, Va. "Things are dragging on so long, nothing's happening, all we're getting is rhetoric."

For many investors, it wasn't supposed to be this way. The year began with optimism that Mr. Obama's administration would act swiftly and decisively to restore order and confidence in the financial system, and inject life into the struggling economy.
Instead, investors' faith has been shaken by delays in getting people and plans in place, a lack of detail on policies needed to rescue the floundering banking system, and occasionally mixed messages from the Obama administration.

And while many may have voted for Mr. Obama with their ballots in November, they're now voting against his early performance with their money, as they pull more of it from the market with each passing day.

"This really is a vote of no-confidence,"
said John Riley, president and chief investment officer of money management firm Cornerstone Investment Services in Dallas. "It really does show they're dropping the ball pretty badly."

Indeed, some of the market's worst stumbles of the past several weeks have come in moments when there had been high hopes that Mr. Obama and his economic team would deliver words and actions that would help clarify market uncertainty and restore some confidence.

On Feb. 10, the day new Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner unveiled a disappointingly fuzzy plan to bail out U.S. banks and their troubled mortgage assets, the S&P 500 plunged 4.9 per cent. When Mr. Obama unveiled his nearly $800-billion (U.S.) fiscal stimulus package on Feb. 17, the S&P 500 tumbled 4.6 per cent. And this week's market slide follows last week's unveiling of the administration's first budget, a monster $3.55-trillion plan that will create an unprecedented $1.75-trillion deficit.

Meanwhile, an element market watchers see as critical to breathing life back into financial markets - the question of what will happen to banks that have been brought to the brink of collapse by toxic mortgage-related assets polluting their balance sheets - will remain unanswered for several weeks yet. The stress tests the government is running on bank assets, to determine which banks are strong enough to survive, won't be completed until the end of April - much later than many frustrated market participants had hoped.

"We need to restore confidence in the banks and the financial system," Mr. Ryder said.

"The market is just looking for some transparency, and there's none forthcoming."


Mr. Riley said the new administration's stumbles out of the gate have heightened concern that it lacks a plan to lead the markets out of the woods, and that has delivered a blow to already shaky investor confidence.

"You need something to restore confidence. At least show some leadership. That's all people want," he said.

"Even bear market rallies are based on hope. That was [Mr. Obama's] campaign slogan, to bring back hope. Well, you brought it back, what did you do with it?"
 
Re: Greg's Account Talk

Last week,

  • DJI down 6.2 %
  • S&p 500 down 7 %
  • Nasdaq down 6.1 %
The punishing slide has left the Dow and S&P 500 down by more than half from their October 2007 peaks. That makes it the second worst run since 1929-32, when the Dow lost more than 85 percent.
 
Re: Greg's Account Talk

3/9/2009
Hedge Funds Turn to Gold
- Financial Times

3/9/2009
Warren Buffett Says Economy Fell Off a Cliff
- Baltimore Sun

3/9/2009
Depression Dynamic Ensues as Markets Revisit 30's
- Bloomberg

3/9/2009
1981-82 Recession Painful; Current Struggles Worse
- Orlando Sentinel

3/9/2009
Recession Finds Even Those With Jobs Losing Pay
- San Diego Union-Tribune

3/9/2009
One Layoff Leads to Another
- Los Angeles Times

3/9/2009
Recession Sends Lawyers Home
- Washington Post

3/9/2009
Massive Cache of Cheap Homes Luring For. Investors
- Newsday

3/9/2009
More Hotels are Facing Foreclosure, Bankruptcy
- USA Today

3/9/2009
In Tough Times, Boat Repo's On The Rise
- Hartford Courant

3/9/2009
A.I.G., Where Taxpayers’ Dollars Go to Die
- New York Times

3/9/2009
Capital One Slashes Dividend 87%
- Reuters
 
Re: Greg's Account Talk

3/10/2009
Tim Geithner's Black Hole
- Washington Post

3/10/2009
24 Million Go From 'Thriving' to 'Struggling'
- USA Today

3/10/2009
Conspicuous Consumption, A Casualty of Recession
- New York Times

3/10/2009
Banks' Future Woes In One Word: Plastic
- CNN Money

3/10/2009
NYC Faces $4.8 Billion Fiscal 2011 Gap
- Bloomberg

3/10/2009
AIG Warned of 'Catastrophic' Failure
- Washington Post

3/10/2009
Construction Slows to a Crawl
- San Francisco Chronicle

3/10/2009
For Sale: Cubicles, Slightly Used
- Chicago Tribune

3/10/2009
Unemployment Rate to Reach 9.4% This Year
- Bloomberg

3/10/2009
Traffic Soars at Job Search Web Sites
- San Francisco Chronicle

3/10/2009
From White-Collar to Welding
- Charlotte Observer
 
Re: Greg's Account Talk

The same dollar you had last year buys you twice as much S&P 500 (C fund) as it did a year ago.
 
Re: Greg's Account Talk

Weekend Reading: Don't Call a Bottom Yet
TheStreet.com - ‎4 hours ago‎

Global Markets in Review: Investors Shrug Aside Gloom
Seeking Alpha - ‎6 hours ago‎

Bear market endgame
Reuters - ‎7 hours ago‎

RPT-Wall St Week Ahead: Fear still in focus after strong rally
Reuters - ‎8 hours ago‎

Now Is a Fantastic Time to Be a Momentum Investor
Motley Fool - ‎9 hours ago‎

Japan's Economic Depression Deepens, Protectionism Could Trigger ...
The Market Oracle - ‎9 hours ago‎

Despite market rally, advisers remain skeptical
InvestmentNews - ‎13 hours ago‎

S&P 500 hints bear market isn't over yet
Newsday - ‎16 hours ago‎

Investment fund teaches students some hard lessons
Augusta Chronicle - ‎17 hours ago‎

China Needs Another $2 Trillion of Treasuries. (Bloomberg)

The Dow at 36,000 and the end of history. (Reuters)

Is Nouriel Roubini too bearish? (Calculated Risk)

The secret history of Bear Stearns' collapse (Fortune)

Greenspan Forgets Where He Put His Asset Bubble. (Bloomberg)
 
Last edited:
Short View: Fed’s shock and awe
Financial Times - ‎1 hour ago‎


Short View: Fed’s shock and awe

By John Authers, Investment editor

Published: March 18 2009 20:37 | Last updated: March 18 2009 22:06

The Federal Reserve is on a war footing and it is using the Powell doctrine – only go to war as a last resort, and do so with overwhelming force.

The stunning news that it would buy $300bn (€222bn) in Treasury bonds (and spend a lot more on many other fixed-interest securities) also used another classic military strategy. It had the element of surprise.


Even after the central banks of Japan, Switzerland and the UK bought bonds and successfully pushed down interest rates (“quantitative easing“), and even though the Fed said three months ago that it might buy bonds, nobody expected such a drastic move. Fed officials had downplayed it in recent days.

It provoked a drastic market response. Ten-year Treasury yields dropped half a percentage point in minutes. The dollar dropped more than 3 per cent against the euro, its biggest daily fall in many years, and the S&P 500 briefly surged above 800, having hit 666 less than two weeks ago.

The Fed had cover from this week’s inflation data if it did not want to go through with the purchases. Both producer and consumer prices are rising a bit faster than had been thought, providing an argument that drastic rate cuts to fight deflation were not necessary.

Sentiment appeared better. The stock rally came amid stories that banks were making money, and that the term asset-backed securities loan facility (Talf) might revive credit, while 10-year yields, at around 3 per cent, were still historically low.

So why did the Fed do it? The theories are out there. With the AIG bonuses moving public opinion against bail-outs, this may be the only way to pump more public money into credit. Congress will not approve such a thing. Or the Fed may know something about the banking system that others do not.

But for now, the tactic of shock and awe rules.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top