Market Talk

imported post

Right now we are in the correction/retracement transition back to hopefully a bull market. The December higher high was 1213.55 (S&P).

Today we closed at 1210.12 on the S&P. Slowley we have been moving up. Like the market was stalking the bull.

Tekno gives a good report of the fundamentals. And the technicals are there creaping ever so slowly. The MACD if looking good along with the RSI which is the relative strength indicator. 50 is the bull/bear line. >70=overbought, <30=oversold.

Attachment: S&P Chart

Rgds, stalking the bull :) Spaf
 
imported post

Is this market running out of gas?

Some of the sectors are responding fairly good! i.e., Global Energy and Natural Resourses. However, this means that we could be approaching a market top. When we begin seeing strength in the consumer staples sectors, we need to be searching for confirmation of a bearish transitional phase. This amounts to a "Be careful"!

The techinical analysis is still bullish, but the market is very sensitive.

Attachment, and be on guard. Rgds :) Spaf
 
imported post

Still waiting to attack... *silos armed and awaiting interfund transfer launch code* :s

Primary target: S&P
Objective: hit it hard after a dropthat followsa new high on strong volume.

Secondary target: EAFE
Objective: wait for a post-high bottom to form while the dollar forms a top on its recent rally.

I will settle for nothing less than total destruction of my enemy: 2005 year to date losses. :@
 
imported post

Waiting to see the whites of their eyes, general?You sound like a banana republic to me. Admit it, you're scared. Alltalk and no action. :l

I might join you in the bunkers if equities start to slip below their 50 day MAs. Barring that, I'm fighting the war.
 
imported post

Granville Predicts 2005 Dow Crash
Joe Granville is a very well regarded technician (now in his 80s) who has had some terrific calls in his career, and a few duds as well. On Bloomberg, there was a story on his most recent commentary, but I cannot seem to find it now; It more likely got moved than disappeared for nefarious reasons.

Anyway, Joe just got Bearish big time. Here's an excerpt:

"Joseph Granville, who accurately forecast in 2000 that U.S. stocks' bull market would end, is at it again. He expects the Dow Jones Industrial Average to suffer its biggest annual loss this year since the Great Depression.

“We're in the critical portion of a coming collapse and the market's screaming to get out,'' said Granville in an interview from Kansas City, Missouri. ``Everyone's bullish. There's going to be a tremendous surprise and it's going to be to the downside.''

"Granville, publisher of the Granville Market Letter since 1963 and a technical analyst for almost 50 years, also foretold a stock-market decline in 1976. He misfired in 1982 and 1995 by calling for losses before share prices surged.

The 81-year-old analyst expects the Dow average to retreat to at least 7400 by year-end. The forecast amounts to a plunge of 31 percent. The last year in which the benchmark fell that much was 1937, when it lost 33 percent.

As a technical analyst, Granville predicts the market's direction by using criteria such as trading and price patterns, rather than earnings and economic growth. He started developing his stock market theory at what was then E.F. Hutton & Co., a New York-based brokerage, from 1957 to 1963."

That bodes well for my 2005 forecast, as Joe tends to be early. I'm still looking for one last strong move up -- Dow 11,700, Nasdaq 2600 -- before it all heads south. Note that also gives me the opportunity to stay long if the uptrend remains in tact.

One of the key mistakes to avoid - call it the peril of predictions -- is to never marry a forecast, especially your own. People wrap up too much ego in what is essentially educated guesswork. If you start with the assumption that your prediction is going to be wrong, its real easy to reverse yourself when necessary . . .

If you are interested in learning more about Granville,start with this article -- Just Like Old Times as Joe Granville Yells `Sell' -- it gives some background on him if you are unfamiliar with his work.

Some more background on Granville:

Timing the Market
http://www.vectorvest.com/research/timingthemarket.htm

Joe Granville, father of the On Balance Volume (OBV) and its analysis
http://www.paritech.com/paritech-site/education/technical/indicators/strength/onbalance.asp

Bibliography of Published Books
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/search-handle-url/index=books&field-author=Joseph%20E%20Granville/104-3776013-8226334



UPDATE: I still cannot find this anywhere, but a friend captured the text. Here it is for your enjoyment:

Equity Strategists: Granville Predicts 2005 Dow Crash
2005-02-04 11:16 (New York)
By Ari Levy

Feb. 4 (Bloomberg) -- Joseph Granville, who accurately forecast in 2000 that U.S. stocks' bull market would end, is at it again. He expects the Dow Jones Industrial Average to suffer its biggest annual loss this year since the Great Depression.

“We're in the critical portion of a coming collapse and the market's screaming to get out,'' said Granville in an interview from Kansas City, Missouri. ``Everyone's bullish. There's going to be a tremendous surprise and it's going to be to the downside.''

Granville, publisher of the Granville Market Letter since 1963 and a technical analyst for almost 50 years, also foretold a stock-market decline in 1976. He misfired in 1982 and 1995 by calling for losses before share prices surged.

The 81-year-old analyst expects the Dow average to retreat to at least 7400 by year-end. The forecast amounts to a plunge of 31 percent. The last year in which the benchmark fell that much was 1937, when it lost 33 percent.

As a technical analyst, Granville predicts the market's direction by using criteria such as trading and price patterns, rather than earnings and economic growth. He started developing his stock market theory at what was then E.F. Hutton & Co., a New York-based brokerage, from 1957 to 1963.

`Pants Down'
Granville's main indicator is called on-balance volume, or OBV, which he developed. The idea “caught me, quite literally with my pants down,'' he wrote in “The Book of Granville,'' published in 1984. “One August morning in 1961 I sat on the toilet in the men's room, away from the hubbub of the research department, musing about the stock market.''

OBV gauges a stock's momentum. If a stock rises, the day's volume will be added to a cumulative OBV figure. If the share price falls, the total will be subtracted. Granville applies this analysis to all 30 stocks in the Dow each day.

“Volumes are pointing to declines based on what I've learned,'' he said.

The Dow average has dropped 1.8 percent this year to 10,593.10, led by Merck & Co.'s 12 percent slump. Granville predicted that the benchmark would tumble 12 percent in the first quarter, to 9500.

Granville also follows charts that track the daily number of advancing and declining stocks, the number of stocks reaching 52- week highs and lows, and investor sentiment. He compiles the measures into what he call his “Net Field Trend Indicator,'' used to predict the market's direction.

‘Last Legs'

In his Jan. 20 newsletter, he wrote that his indicator had retreated to its level on Oct. 21, 1929, eight days before the Dow's two-day, 24 percent plunge. “The Dow is technically on its last legs,'' he wrote.

Granville, who has written books on subjects ranging from stamp investing to winning at Bingo in addition to the stock market, has made accurate forecasts in the past.

On March 11, 2000, the day after the Nasdaq climbed to a record 5048.62, Granville wrote that investors in technology stocks “will soon be burned.'' The index plunged 78 percent before bottoming on Oct. 9, 2002.

In 1976, in his book “Granville's New Strategy of Daily Stock Market Timing for Maximum Profit,'' he said a bear market would occur from 1977-1978. The Dow plunged 26 percent from the beginning of 1977 through February 1978 after a two-year surge.

1987
Granville has also been wrong. He was bearish from 1982 until early 1986, according to the Hulbert Financial Digest, a service of MarketWatch Inc. that tracks and ranks more than 180 financial market newsletters. Over that period, the Dow had a 17 percent annualized return.

During the Crash of 1987, he was bullish, Hulbert said. The average plunged 23 percent on Oct. 19 of that year.

Granville, who charges a $250 annual subscription rate for his weekly market letter, was also incorrect in predicting a stock-market plunge in October 1995. He turned bullish in July 1996, after the Dow industrials climbed about 20 percent.

“Unlike most letter writers, I admit when I'm wrong,'' he said. On March 14, 2002, he published a letter entitled “I Was Wrong'' that admitted to “staying cautious'' for too long in February 2002. The Dow gained 5.9 percent between Jan. 31 and March 13, the day before his admission.

“He's very well respected as a market technician, but the bottom line is the bottom line,'' said Mark Hulbert, editor of the Hulbert Digest. For anyone who followed his advice during the past 20 years, “Would you be better off than putting your money in an index fund? The answer is no.''

5 Percent

Granville's record as a market timer is better for the five years ended in December, according to Hulbert's data. Investors using his recommendations to buy and sell a fund mirroring the Wilshire 5000 Index would have produced a 5 percent annualized return. Investors who bought and held the index fund for those five years would have lost on average 1.4 percent a year.

Even with his bleak forecast, Granville isn't the most bearish technical analyst. Robert Prechter, chief executive of Elliot Wave International, has predicted the Dow may eventually fall below 1000.

Granville is more bearish than strategists at investment banks, who focus more on fundamentals such as earnings. They expect the S&P 500 to climb 3.1 percent to 1250 in 2005, based on the median estimate in a survey of 14 analysts by Bloomberg.

In his view, it's better to follow his advice than to listen to firms on Wall Street, which “seldom get it right.'' Charts show “the market will go up on falling earnings and down on rising earnings,'' Granville wrote on Jan. 27. This “makes one wonder about the level of Wall Street intelligence.''
 
imported post

teknobucks wrote:
Granville Predicts 2005 Dow Crash

"Granville, publisher of the Granville Market Letter since 1963 and a technical analyst for almost 50 years, also foretold a stock-market decline in 1976. He misfired in 1982 and 1995 by calling for losses before share prices surged.

That bodes well for my 2005 forecast, as Joe tends to be early. I'm still looking for one last strong move up -- Dow 11,700, Nasdaq 2600 -- before it all heads south. Note that also gives me the opportunity to stay long if the uptrend remains in tact.
Sounds like he's usually 5 years ahead of time (crashes in 1987 and 2000). That puts the crash at 2010. Plenty of time to buy back Ebay. ;)
 
imported post

saraho wrote:
teknobucks wrote:
Granville Predicts 2005 Dow Crash

"Granville, publisher of the Granville Market Letter since 1963 and a technical analyst for almost 50 years, also foretold a stock-market decline in 1976. He misfired in 1982 and 1995 by calling for losses before share prices surged.

That bodes well for my 2005 forecast, as Joe tends to be early. I'm still looking for one last strong move up -- Dow 11,700, Nasdaq 2600 -- before it all heads south. Note that also gives me the opportunity to stay long if the uptrend remains in tact.
Sounds like he's usually 5 years ahead of time (crashes in 1987 and 2000). That puts the crash at 2010. Plenty of time to buy back Ebay. ;)
he has been a laughing stock before like many others in his business:



[align=center]




· Steve Forbes


· Robert Prechter


· Anne Fisher



· Jim Rogers


· Marty Weiner


· Phillip Gotthelf



· Robert Lazner


· Bill Fleckenstein


· John Bollinger



· Robert Schiller


· Chris Mathews


·Damon Vickers



· William H. Gates


· Joe Granville


· William O’Neill



· Larry Williams


· Howard Ruff


· Arthur Levitt



· George Gilder


· Duff McDonald


· Stan Weinstein [/align]
[align=center][/align]
[align=center]suppose that's why they dish out advice...V. just hang out on some tropical island and trade![/align]
[align=center]always liked sir john templeton....gotta admire his style.


[/align]
 
imported post

here's a saying by one of those guru's...always liked this one!

It is not just important to be right... but to be right at the right time...
The context of the move is more important than what the move is...
The Market is a very expensive place to find out who you are...
How the market responds to the news is more important than what the news is...
Placing Capital in The Path of Social Change
Sales and earnings come from you and I buying stuff
In Bear Markets we sell the rallies/In Bull Markets we buy the dips... DON'T CONFUSE THE TWO!!!
 
imported post

What is the best TSP fund??

The G-fund: it allows for capital preservation. The rest are just players!

What about a stop.

Trailing stops are points to exit positions when thereareindications that the fund is no longer profitable. Sometimes a trailing stop may be the previous higher low, maybe a percentage, but not over 5-6%, and it may be a number. The thing is when indicators show that a position is losing, minimize your loss.

If you minimize your loss you can always play another day.

00000057.gif
Rgds Spaf
 
imported post

saraho wrote:
teknobucks wrote:
He misfired in 1982 and 1995 by calling for losses before share prices surged.
Sounds like he's usually 5 years ahead of time (crashes in 1987 and 2000). That puts the crash at 2010. Plenty of time to buy back Ebay. ;)
ahaha...and he obviously doesn't know about years ending in '5'!
 
imported post

few interesting articles:

http://www.kitcocasey.com/displayArticle.php?id=26

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=509&ncid=509&e=33&u=/ap/20050217/ap_on_bi_ge/farm_scene

http://wps2a.semi.org/wps/portal/_pagr/117/_pa.117/122?dFormat=application/msword&docName=P034679

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4271011.stm

http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/mars_life_050216.html


and one more....

Jailed Ex-Official Linked To More Defense Contracts
washingtonpost.com
By Renae Merle
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 15, 2005; Page E01

Darleen A. Druyun, the former Air Force procurement official who admitted showing Boeing Co. favoritism on contracts, may have unduly influenced eight other contracts worth about $3 billion, including four awarded to other companies, Pentagon officials said yesterday.

Druyun's admissions last year sparked a review of 407 contracts she dealt with during her nine-year tenure as a top Air Force procurement official. The possible irregularities were referred to the Pentagon's inspector general for further review, the officials said.

The contracting process may have been "sped up, interrupted or unduly influenced" by Druyun, Mike Wynne, the Pentagon's acting acquisition chief, told reporters at a briefing. "It pains me to find any instance where the contracts could have been manipulated for other than the best interest of the taxpayer. There is no best practice or metric that allows for anything other than zero defects in this area."

The Defense Contract Management Agency found that in some of the contracts, Druyun changed the outcome of the award decision or directed someone else to, according to a source briefed on the review. Air Force officials coined the term "DSS: Darleen Says So" as a short response to dismiss questions about Druyun's decisions, said the source, who would speak only on condition of anonymity. In some cases, the cost of the contract increased or the requirements were "watered down" or written after the contract award, the source added.

Druyun is serving a nine-month prison sentence for negotiating a $250,000 job with Boeing, which also hired her daughter and son-in-law, while still overseeing the company's contracts with the Air Force. The inspector general is already investigating seven contracts in which Druyun admitted favoring Boeing.

The newly identified contracts with potential problems include a $561 million contract with Lockheed Martin Corp. to upgrade the C-5 cargo plane, a $42 million contract with Lockheed for F-16 mission training centers, an $82.5 million Accenture contract to develop a financial information system, and a $158 million award to St. Louis-based Systems & Electronics Inc. for ground equipment used to speed the loading of wide-body military jets. Four more Boeing contracts were also referred for further review.

Lockheed spokesman Thomas J. Jurkowsky said the two Lockheed contracts cited yesterday were unrelated to a job offer the company made to Druyun. She accepted a job with Lockheed before reneging to join Boeing.

Lockheed, Accenture, Systems & Electronics and Boeing all said they would cooperate with the new reviews.

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), who led an investigation of the Druyun scandal, said he plans to hold a hearing on whether the procurement failures are "systematic in nature."

"It would be astonishing if the IG determined serious misconduct in awarding the contracts could have been so freely perpetrated by one individual," he said in a statement.

After Druyun's admissions, the Pentagon also ordered a Defense Science Board review of how it buys weapons, which is expected to be completed next month. The board has already recommended that the Pentagon "emphasize ethics, respect for people and the implementation of best business practices," Wynne said. "I think all of the leadership has to take responsibility for creating an environment that would have allowed Darleen" to manipulate the contracting process.

The Government Accountability Office is expected to rule this week on protests filed by Boeing's competitors after Druyun admitted that her relationship with Boeing tainted her decision to award the company a $4 billion contract to upgrade the electronics on the C-130 transport plane.

The Air Force already has denied two protests filed by Bethesda-based Lockheed on two classified projects that went to Boeing, according to Air Force officials.

Michael M. Sears, Boeing's former chief financial officer, is scheduled to plead guilty Friday to negotiating a job with Druyun while she was still overseeing Boeing's contracts with the Air Force.

© 2005 The Washington Post Company
 
imported post

[align=center][/align]

[align=center]NOT GOOD..... suppose NORTH KOREA is just too far away to join thisclub?wonder if it was the kimchee breathe or that buddha stuff that kept them out of the group??LOL[/align]

[align=center]Iran’s president Khatami called for Tehran’s strategic alliance with Syria to create a powerful Islamic front that could confront America and Israel. He threatened anyone striking Iran’s nuclear facilities with swift and crushing response.[/align]
[align=center][/align]
[align=center][/align]

[align=center]
[align=center]Bush told reporters when asked how US would react if Israel attacked nuclear-armed Iran: We are trying to solve problem diplomatically. But if I was Israel’s leader and heard ayatollahs’ statements I would be concerned too.[/align]
[align=center]Israel is our ally and we will support Israel if its security is threatened. We hope to develop with Europe and Israel a strategy for this issue[/align][/align]
 
imported post

semi's like all other charts have an optimistic side. in fact spy's, dia's and qqqq's 6mos-1year all show a cup and handle!
 
Back
Top