Market Talk

imported post

Todd Market Forecast Stock Market Update for the close on Friday 02/11/05



STOCK MARKET ANALYSIS:
The stock market was mainly sideways on Friday except for a 30 minute
surge that seemed to be a reaction to a rumor that Kim Jong II had been
deposed. After the rumor was debunked the stock market did not give back
its gains.
The market was also helped by a 2 for 1 stock split by Apple Computer
and a general sense that the Semiconductors were headed higher. The
semiconductor index, SOX gained 3.6% for the day. That's like a Dow gain
of 390 points. Incidentally, stock splits frequently come at tops. The last
Apple split was in June of 2000 and the next 2 1/2 years were down for the
stock.
We have been telling you that the market looked to be headed higher on a
short term basis, but the Dow and S&P 500 are now approaching the late
December highs. This is where the last rally was turned back which makes it
a resistance level.
Our best estimate is that the market will not make it through these levels,
at least not on this run. We think that there is a good chance that another
multi day decline will soon ensue. At some point, we will break out to the
upside, but probably not now. However, we will await to be instructed. On
an intermediate term basis, we are quite bullish. Stay tuned.

NEWS AND FUNDAMENTALS:
There were no economic releases to report on Friday.
On the stock front, the aforementioned Apple Computer rose 4%. MKS
Instruments and Watson Pharmaceuticals beat estimates and added 6% and
10%. Analog Devices came up short on earnings, but still moved higher by
3%. Novellus Systems rose 7% after an upgrade by C.S. First Boston.
On the negative side, Dell beat estimates and guided higher, but revenue
was regarded as light and the stock lost 4% and no I don't understand it
either. Coinstar sank 6% after forecasting lower results than Wall Street
expected. Hovnanian lost 5% on negative comments by Smith Barney. Pixar
and Click Commerce beat estimates, but came up short on revenue and gave
up 4% and 18%. Sharper Image guided lower and lost 11%.

BOTTOM LINE:
Our S&P and NASDAQ intermediate term systems remain on a buy
signal. Mutual fund investors are 100% invested in a growth or index fund
of their choice.

SPY and QQQQ traders are in cash. Stay there for now.

For new subscribers, the QQQQ and SPY are exchange traded funds or
Spiders.
The former mimics the Nasdaq 100 and the latter mimics the S&P 500. ----
Additionally, an m.i.t. order means “market if touched” It means that your
order becomes a market order if the price is touched.

OTHER MARKETS

We are on a buy signal for bonds.
 
imported post

another point of view off stock chat rooms:

Weekly Trend Review....Week 6, 2005


Trend Analysis:

The short term momentum oscillators remain positive, non-confirming the bearish stance of the primary trend indicators. The accumulation/distribution profile is bearish, with a slew of higher volume distribution days in 2005, and only 1 accumulation day. Still no sign of the 2%+ follow-through day on increasing volume needed to trigger a new buy signal for the accumulation/distribution profile indicator.

The leadership profile remains bullish, with Friday's close yielding 395 stocks making new 52 week highs versus 83 stocks making new 52 week lows. The 4% rule remains positive, matching the bullish stance of Federal Reserve policy. The VXO volatility indicator closed the week at 11.23, as complacent as ever, and remains contrarian bearish.

Despite the recent weakness in early 2005, the potential Elliott Wave 5 blow-off rally to the NASDAQ 2500-3000 level remains the most logical wave count, though we will publish the alternative, more bearish, wave count should the stock indexes go into free-fall.

Seasonal trends have us looking for a bullish start to 2005, while the Presidential cycle has us looking for a bull market peak sometime in 2005 to mark the start of a new cyclical bear market. Longer term cycles - such as the Benner-Fibonacci cycle - signal a bullish 2005.

Summary:

There is one over-riding question in regards to the current trend: is the current rally attempt part of a new breakout run or part of a topping action? This is of great importance in regards to the bigger picture of where we are in bull/bear cycle.

The basic pattern for the S&P shows a massive 5 wave bull market advance that ended in 2000, followed by a prolonged bear market retracement and subsequent rebound rally. If we attribute the 2000 peak for the stock market as the Elliott Wave peak labeled '5.' and '1' in the first chart, then the bear market from 2000-2002/3 must be the expected wave 'a.' , and the 2003/2004 rally the expected wave 'b.', which all means that we are looking at a potential resumption of the bear market into an expected wave 'c.' once the current rally attempt fails and reverses.

The recent breakout rally for most stock indexes to close out 2004 was a clear 5th wave advance following the sideways wave 4 action of last year. One can only speculate whether we have reached the end of this wave 5, or whether the 5th wave advance will resume and head to the S&P500 resistance shelf near 1350-1400 (NASDAQ 2500-3000.) What is clear is that the end of the bull-run is near, and great caution is warranted here on the long side. While more upside is possible - and wave 5 advances offer great trading opportunities on the long side (remember the latter half of 1999?) -the risk of a painful end to the bull-run off the 2002/3 bear lows is equally great.

It is not if the bear will return to complete unfinished business; but when.
 
imported post

Tekno,

Also $20B of IRS tax rebates hit the market at 10am.

The market has turned into buy on the rumour...and hold on. Hmm. Shuffle up an deal.

Interesting point of fact, the last to two times Apple has split March 2000 and August 1987 we had a market crash shortly there after....just a tid bit for ya.

Here is a women I would actually think about marrying....but that has all changed:

HUTCHINSON, Kan. - — For 20 years, Sarah Scantlin has been mostly oblivious to the world around her — the victim of a drunken driver who struck her down as she walked to her car. Today, after a remarkable recovery, she can talk again.

She was perfect!

Have a great day...going to the Pro Bowl, going to the Pro Bowl...see ya.

1111
 
imported post

the crash of 1987 is hard to see but if you were through it...were apple split you lost about 22% in two days...NO BIG DEAL...

aapl.gif
 
imported post

Pat_1111 wrote:
Tekno,

Also $20B of IRS tax rebates hit the market at 10am.

The market has turned into buy on the rumour...and hold on. Hmm. Shuffle up an deal.

Interesting point of fact, the last to two times Apple has split March 2000 and August 1987 we had a market crash shortly there after....just a tid bit for ya.

Here is a women I would actually think about marrying....but that has all changed:

HUTCHINSON, Kan. - — For 20 years, Sarah Scantlin has been mostly oblivious to the world around her — the victim of a drunken driver who struck her down as she walked to her car. Today, after a remarkable recovery, she can talk again.

She was perfect!

Have a great day...going to the Pro Bowl, going to the Pro Bowl...see ya.

1111
be sure to eat at: http://www.samchoy.com/restaurants/index.html

AWESOME FOOD!!:D
 
imported post

darn can not two charts at once...look at 1987 and 2000...OUCH - same time apple split...

_gspc.gif
 
imported post

teknobucks wrote:
Pat_1111 wrote: be sure to eat at: http://www.samchoy.com/restaurants/index.html

AWESOME FOOD!!:D
Tekno,

I found this little hole in the way place...that is awesome...sam choy is all show to me be...do not be flipping, throwing or playing with my food...cook it and serve it...save the show...but I guess it is good to go once in awhile.

The apple watch continues....can they pull a three bagger!!! The market was all excited and I was like....oh crap...guys don't you remember the last two times they split? I guess sort of like friday everyone was like --what a great week..guys dont you remember we were flat for the week....:cool:ha ha.

Not to be negative but those who do not remember what happened in the past are doomed for failure in the future...you can spin history all ya want (sarah) but things are not looking choyey to me.
 
imported post

What is clear is that the end of the bull-run is near, and great caution is warranted here on the long side. While more upside is possible - and wave 5 advances offer great trading opportunities on the long side (remember the latter half of 1999?) -the risk of a painful end to the bull-run off the 2002/3 bear lows is equally great.

It is not if the bear will return to complete unfinished business; but when.

This is an excellent summary. Doesn't mean we can't jump in and out for some small gains. I expect the remainder of this month to be tough to make any gains. Maybe the last of the month. I'll be looking to buy the dips.We are lucky to be able to shift into a safe haven fund. Wish all my other investments were this easy.
 
imported post

I rather be a couple days early then a couple days late...because once this baby starts it is going to be fast and hard,fast and hard(got a phone call to make ;))...have a great weekend...do what ya got to do...I really don't care...just trying to bring a different view to the board...there are some folks that can not afford to take a 75% hit again like the NAS fell from 2000-2002....S&P only fell 50% so that would be my safe haven...only have to make 100% to get back to even....piece of cake...

Good bye.
 
imported post

2000 thru 2002 was certainly a learning experience for me. What bothers me most is that somesavy investors made money even then. :( Thanks for the heads up.
 
imported post

Will be starting a new thread for every one to chat on. This one is kind of full!!!

Rgds, enjoy your posts! :) Spaf

........................................................................................................................................
 
imported post

saraho wrote:
"MT ahh Pat :P"

Tom, I thought two nicks were verboten. Are the rules different for certain people?
I was out of town. I see what has been going on and MT is banned and "Pat_1111" has been deleted.
 
imported post

tsptalk wrote:
saraho wrote:
"MT ahh Pat :P"

Tom, I thought two nicks were verboten. Are the rules different for certain people?
I was out of town. I see what has been going on and MT is banned and "Pat_1111" has been deleted.
I was wondering why i didn't see MT on here anymore. That guy never agreed to anything besides that he was always right.

Tennis Guy
 
imported post

tennisguy wrote:
That guy never agreed to anything besides that he was always right.

hahahaha...so true.



saraho wrote:
"MT ahh Pat :P"

Tom, I thought two nicks were verboten. Are the rules different for certain people?


SeeeeEEEeeee....a woman is always the crux of a man's downfall. :D



So..is this, like, MT's Memorial Service? baha.
 
Back
Top