alevin
Market Veteran
- Reaction score
- 97
http://www.amazon.com/Monster-Predatory-Lenders-Bankers-America/dp/0805090460/ref=pd_rhf_p_t_1

Karl D. has read this book, talked about it's contents this morning. Non-fiction.

Karl D. has read this book, talked about it's contents this morning. Non-fiction.
http://market-ticker.org/ Title of the article in case you don't read it today...."Two Sets of Books....."This is the part of the lending story that nobody wants to talk about. Wall Street securitized this paper, even though they knew they were securitizing trash. The original documents would prove the frauds - if they were ever produced in court.
So the key is to, of course, never produce original documents - that way they can't be challenged, there is no evidence, and the only focus we have is on the borrower, who of course isn't paying and thus we have an excuse to railroad him or her.
Never do we look into what he signed (or didn't), what was forged, what was gamed.
The W2 that isn't really his - oh, he submitted one, but the loan broker used a scanner and Photoshop, and the one in the file isn't the one that the customer submitted. The borrower has a fixed-rate disclosure document, but in the file is an adjustable-rate one that was at the bottom of the 3" stack of paper; the customer unwittingly signed that, and the fixed-rate one on the top was destroyed. The "GFE" - Good-Faith Estimate - that the customer has in his folder doesn't match the one in the file either, because that too was doctored - and we know for a fact the customer didn't change that piece of paper.
Why aren't we using the words "fraud", "felony", "prosecution", or "criminal"?