We've all seen the rule-of-thumb that your gross income in retirement should be 60-100% of your pre-retirement gross.
In my case, and probably some of you other civil servants, more than half of my current gross goes to savings or employment costs which will go away at retirement.
I took my LES and subtracted ALL of the deductions that will NOT following me into retirement. That left pretty much only income tax, Medicare, FEGLI Basic, and FEHB. I take home (and live on) about 45% of my gross now.
So, if I assume I'll need 70% of gross in retirement (as the experts say), my calculations show nearly TWICE as much disposable income needed in retirement as I live on now.
I think, rather than use a percentage of gross, it's more accurate to use "100% of pre-retirement take-home plus tax, insurance, etc."
Anyone see any error in my logic?
In my case, and probably some of you other civil servants, more than half of my current gross goes to savings or employment costs which will go away at retirement.
I took my LES and subtracted ALL of the deductions that will NOT following me into retirement. That left pretty much only income tax, Medicare, FEGLI Basic, and FEHB. I take home (and live on) about 45% of my gross now.
So, if I assume I'll need 70% of gross in retirement (as the experts say), my calculations show nearly TWICE as much disposable income needed in retirement as I live on now.
I think, rather than use a percentage of gross, it's more accurate to use "100% of pre-retirement take-home plus tax, insurance, etc."
Anyone see any error in my logic?