I fund

[ebbnflow]

I am pretty sure, I added a note in my last comment. Like I said, the triple patterns timeline was discovered early last year, so don't go by my past record. I don't think your TZA/TNA or TSP trades have a chance against the triple patterns (TNA since Nov. '08: +1,300%). Hate to break it to you, but study after study points to frequent churning of assets resulting in less profits than buy-and-hold (look it up). Your model is simply unsustainable. You'll find that out yourself, sooner or later. Good luck!

Studies done by folks who couldn't do it my friend. Let's see how you feel once the next big bear shows up. I'll still be making money, even in TSP, while you're content hiding out in the G fund all year. Just saying............... You never mentioned what you're TNA trades made last year? Nevermind, we already know......................

Ok, now I'm convinced you are clueless about the the triple patterns. FYI: Triple patterns eat bear markets for breakfast.

If you check out my charts, I never use the G-fund for safe haven (only the F-fund is used).

After mentioning that TNA (following the triple patterns) produced a gain of 1,300% (since Nov. 2008), what does it matter how it did last year? For the record, the triple patterns had TNA on buy all of last year. The thing is, it's like me telling you that it did +10,000% since 2008, and you go, "yeah, but how did it do last year?" :laugh:

 

[Intrepid_Timer]

Ok, now I'm convinced you are clueless about the the triple patterns. FYI: Triple patterns eat bear markets for breakfast.

If you check out my charts, I never use the G-fund for safe haven (only the F-fund is used).

After mentioning that TNA (following the triple patterns) produced a gain of 1,300% (since Nov. 2008), what does it matter how it did last year? For the record, the triple patterns had TNA on buy all of last year. The thing is, it's like me telling you that it did +10,000% since 2008, and you go, "yeah, but how did it do last year?" :laugh:

And what if I told you that 1300% since Nov 2008 is crap? You're posting back-tested data. The forum is full of back-tested wannabes who didn't actually perform like they said they could.

Sounds like a challenge to me, and I LOVE challenges. What do you say? Your TNA trades against my TNA/TZA trades for the next two years (since you think no one can time the markets consistently) and the loser ends their premium service? I'll even give you the head start you currently have. Before you agree, make sure you read my end of year report. My system blew the S&P 500 out of the water last year, and the year before, and the year before, and the year before. I just can't use all it's signals for TSP. With TNA/TZA, I can.......................

 

[Intrepid_Timer]

Ok, now I'm convinced you are clueless about the the triple patterns. FYI: Triple patterns eat bear markets for breakfast.

If you check out my charts, I never use the G-fund for safe haven (only the F-fund is used).

After mentioning that TNA (following the triple patterns) produced a gain of 1,300% (since Nov. 2008), what does it matter how it did last year? For the record, the triple patterns had TNA on buy all of last year. The thing is, it's like me telling you that it did +10,000% since 2008, and you go, "yeah, but how did it do last year?" :laugh:

FYI, I'm not "clueless" about your triple patterns, I could just care less. Your patterns are based on historical data and I for one know that history constantly changes.................oh, and about that challenge, just so you know, last year I always stuck with my first buy signal of the month, this year I'm not putting that limitation on myself this year. Last year there where two months that I warned subscribers that they might want to wait for my system's second buy signal of the month instead of using the first like I did. By heeding those warnings, my return would have been better than yours, including that supposed 18.69% that you "should" have made.

I love guys that say "don't look at last year" even though that is when they said they started using their "new" system................. Also, it's funny how you choose to post your returns beginning in Nov of 2008, AFTER TNA lost it's butt for the year................oh well, I actually hope you do well over the next couple of years. Then maybe I can "retire" and just become one of your subscribers. Until I see the proof though, I still have the best timing system around................