Exnavyew's Account Talk

Good news or bad news?

Possible 'bad news' cuz the FED might view it as an indicator that the economy continues to improve and go ahead and keep raising interest rates. And of course Wall Street hates interest rate hikes.

Possible 'good news' cuz, well, the economy is improving, the 'consumer' has more money to spend and that should benefit corporate profits. Right?

U.S. incomes are finally growing
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/u-s--incomes-are-finally-growing-161416587.html#
 
Yes, I don't subscribe to the Fib Queen but I saw this chart yesterday. Seems to say a squirrels chance of going up and a big bears chance of going back down again but Jim Cramer sure does make it sound inviting doesn't he? :smile:
 
Ex C130 Nav here, and I did a lot of Cramer following in 2005 and 2006. My son and I appeared on his show, Flag Day 2006, to present a challenge coin and a US flag that had traveled through Iraq. Up to that point, my son's college stock funds benefitted from keeping up on Cramer and his perspective.

But when he loudly lamented on what the Fed Chairman was doing when the real estate market/load debacle unfolded, I began to lose interest. His focus was on 'my friends on Wall Street who were losing money' because the Fed would not intervene. After my personal research and a great movie in The Big Short, the events he was clambering about didn't center on his friends. There are other Americans caught into losing homes and retirement monies because of the greed wrapped up in derivatives offerings. He has lost credibility with bringing me truth.

If others can get some joy from him, I wish them well and good luck. I will watch the market trend in direction, volume, and metric relationships. And concur.......got some upside in the short term until we get past 2020 in the S&P.
 
Terrible officiating.
In the first half refs called a rash of 'ticky-tack' fouls and were
justifiably blasted by the commentators.
Then, as if the refs heard the 1st half criticism, u had to be mugged

to get a foul called in the second half.



That said, a great game with a classic finish.
A miracle shot to tie it and then a miracle shot

at the buzzer to win it.
What a great, classic finish.


Villanova tops Carolina 77-74 on Jenkins' buzzer-beater
 
Let us not forget, in 1985, in one of the greatest upsets in college basketball history, the number 8 seed Villanova Wildcats beat the number 1 seed Georgetown Hoyas, 66-64, to win the NCAA Men’s Division I tournament. The victory was Villanova’s first-ever national championship. Now Villanova repeats another "one of the greatest games in college basketball history". Both historical great wins for Villanova. Felt bad for Patrick Ewing expecting a win and a national championship for the Hoyas. I think he was a senior on his way to the NBA NY Knicks.
 
Let us not forget, in 1985, in one of the greatest upsets in college basketball history, the number 8 seed Villanova Wildcats beat the number 1 seed Georgetown Hoyas, 66-64, to win the NCAA Men’s Division I tournament. The victory was Villanova’s first-ever national championship. Now Villanova repeats another "one of the greatest games in college basketball history". Both historical great wins for Villanova. Felt bad for Patrick Ewing expecting a win and a national championship for the Hoyas. I think he was a senior on his way to the NBA NY Knicks.



Yeah, I remember that classic game. Nova shot 79% from the field!
Villanova vs. Georgetown Box Score, April 1, 1985 | College Basketball at Sports-Reference.com

Where does Villanova-North Carolina rank among the greatest title games?
 
Good to see you post again EXN. As long as the Fed keeps printing (and making its debt payments), we are living in the Golden Age..:D:D:D

FS
 
I think the market has been trading in a tight range for weeks because Wall Street is mesmerized
by the presidential election and waiting for some kind of 'AHA' moment to decide which way to jump....or not.

Also, an oldie but a goodie:

HELLUVA QUESTION

The following is an actual question given on a University of Minnesota chemistry mid-term.

The answer by one student was so "profound" that the professor shared it with colleagues, via the Internet, which is, of
course, why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well :

Bonus Question:
Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?

Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is
compressed) or some variant.

One student, however, wrote the following:
First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into
Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave.
Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today.
Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there is more than one of these
religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates
as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially.
Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature
and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added.

This gives two possibilities:

1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate
at which souls
enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell
will increase
until all Hell breaks loose.

2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the
increase of souls in
Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop
until Hell freezes
over.

So which is it?

If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa
during my Freshman
year that, "It will be a cold day in Hell before I
sleep with you,"
and take into account the fact that I slept with her
last night, then
number two must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell
is exothermic
and has already frozen over. The corollary of this
theory is that
since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not
accepting any
more souls and is therefore, extinct.... leaving only
Heaven, thereby
proving the existence of a divine being which explains
why, last
night, Teresa kept shouting "Oh my God."

THE STUDENT RECEIVED THE ONLY "A"!
 
Back
Top