The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com
Please read our AutoTracker policy on the IFT deadline and remaining active. Thanks!
$ - Premium Service Content (Info) | AutoTracker Monthly Winners | Is Gmail et al, Blocking Our emails?
Find us on: Facebook & X | Posting Copyrighted Material
Join the TSP Talk AutoTracker: How to Get Started | Login | Main AutoTracker Page
The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com ...
Or you can now use TapaTalk again!
So, why didn't QE1 or QE2 prompt all of this expansion???"By opening up the purchase program to other asset types such as stocks and corporate bonds there could be multiple benefits to the marketplace and the economy as a whole by lowering the cost of capital structures for companies. In the case of equity purchases it would send an immediate signal of a relative bottom in securities while over the long term build the business confidence needed to prompt businesses to start putting record cash piles into riskier projects such as expansion; prompting hiring."
Uh, no.and the surface must be the government promoting infrastructure [etc.] demand.
Good words, not so good words but well thought out, it's late and I'll sleep on it before I post, you make some good points.Nuutt: As an independent and IMHO, I agree with you that we should have the corporate tax rate lowered without loopholes to a competitive international rate and I suggest that while we are at it: we should make the rich have competitive higher individual tax rates without loopholes as found in all other first world nations. There, I just made enemies of both the right and the left: see, I am an independent.
I know people can forget, but we just had a 10 year trial in which we tried reduced taxes to the wealthy with reduced regulation and see what that got us: minimal private sector jobs, banks too big to fail yet self infecting with credit default swaps, businesses and banks with short term goals of making money while too leveraged [on the backs of the financially uneducated, most of us are dumb money] over goals of long term prosperity, wealth increases of 100% in the wealthy [300% over 28 years] and 2% loss in real growth of the low and middle class over 30 years.
Big business is not hiring nor has an interest in hiring.
A good small business which is more labor intensive can adjust within a week to any new price increase in flour, steel, insurance rates. If one has a better mouse trap, more people will buy that product and their raw material costs go down with increased product economies of scale: good old fashioned free enterprise with increased prices and salaries. Let's not make out small business as weaklings, provided they have a good business plan and innovate.
Lastly, I prefer generalized prosperity over civil unrest, as we don't have enough police because half of them have been fired.
Remember, though immunizing all citizens may be considered socialist, it is the best way for wealthy senior citizens to protect themselves against contagion in an aging body. Independents rule!