Ha,
So, Peter Orszag - one month and seven days separated from the Obama Administration - writes an OpEd in the New York Times presenting a case for extending the Bush tax code another two years...
His Reasoning:
Higher taxes now would crimp consumer spending, further depressing the already inadequate demand for what firms are capable of producing at full tilt.
Now, that sounds familiar. And, since the corpulent rich spend like pigs in the trough (and they really don't have to) I contend that we want them to spend like drunk Liberals three years from now!!! Orszag doesn't, my opinion. Why entice them to stop
But, of course we can continue running up massive debt:
And since financial markets don’t seem at the moment to view the budget deficit as a problem — take a look at the remarkably low 10-year Treasury bond yield — there is little reason not to extend the tax cuts temporarily.
A benign bond market, however, is a luxury we won’t enjoy forever if we fail to tackle our long-term fiscal problem. What’s more, losing the confidence of the bond market could prove painful, since it is widely known that our fiscal trajectory is unsustainable and market sentiment may therefore shift quickly and unpredictably. In any case, as the economy recovers, the dominant problem will move from depressed demand to excessive budget deficits.
Thus, he recommends an immediate cancelation of the Bush tax code two years hence.
Mr. Orszag,
here is another solution :
At this point, it would be helpful to recall how much spending Democrats have added to the annual federal budget since taking control of Congress: over a trillion dollars. The final budget from the Republican-controlled Congress, FY2007, spent $2.77 trillion and had a deficit of just under $200 billion, even with the war included. The last budget from Democrats came in at over $3.8 trillion, with a $1.3 trillion deficit. That’s a 38% increase in just three years.
Are we to believe that Congress can’t find $400 billion in annual spending to trim out of the massive expansion committed by Democrats?
Remember, folks, we are talking
only about the structural growth in spending authorized by this Administration and this Congress over the past
two years.