2014 back in the red

Stocks opened slightly lower on Monday, and treaded water for a couple of hours before the bottom started to fall out of the indices. This decline comes as we are heading into earnings season, where we are seeing a lot of negative pre-announcements. The Dow lost 179-points and all of the TSP stock funds are back in the red for the year. Bonds rallied.
[TABLE="width: 79%, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD]
011414.gif
[/TD]
[TD="align: center"]Daily TSP Funds Return
011414s.gif
[TABLE="width: 69%, align: center"]
[TR]
[TD="align: right"]More returns [/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
The S&P 500 (SPY) fell through the 20-day EMA and other than a new lower low in 2014, there hasn't been too much technical damage done to the chart yet. It was the most heavily traded day of the year, which may be a concern, and the next test for the SPY would be the rising support line.

011414a.gif

Chart provided courtesy of www.decisionpoint.com, analysis by TSP Talk

Should that support from the bottom of the rising trading channel fail, then the dreaded 1929 chart comparison remains a possibility. The chances of a crash are remote, but still, this formation is called a "Three peaks and a Domed House" and they are bearish and can lead to significant declines after peaking. Today is January 14, which by comparison would have been the top in 1929, but the Dow actually peaked for us on December 31.

011414b.gif

Chart provided courtesy of www.mcoscillator.com, analysis by TSP Talk

A little follow-up: Before the jobs report last week, I was suggesting that the report could help close the gap on the chart of the dollar ETF, UUP. Since then the UUP has moved lower although there is a good portion of the gap still open. And, although not as large, the drop last Friday opened a small gap on the upside.

011414c.gif

Chart provided courtesy of www.decisionpoint.com, analysis by TSP Talk

I also noted that because the I-fund benefits from weakness in the dollar, the open gap above on the EFA chart could get filled should the dollar fill its gap. That nearly happened prior to yesterday's sell-off, and it is officially still open, but Friday's rally may have "unofficially" filled it.

Bond yields fell again yesterday, and falling bond yields are in general caused by signs of weakness in the economy as lower interest rates make it easier to borrow, and thus spend. Clearly the uptrend in bond yields broke after the weak jobs report last week, and the decline continued on Monday.

011414h.gif

Chart provided courtesy of www.decisionpoint.com, analysis by TSP Talk

The price of bonds and the F-fund benefit from this action as investors look for alternative places to put assets when stocks fall, but there's more to it...

011414g.gif

Chart provided courtesy of www.decisionpoint.com, analysis by TSP Talk

Bond market sentiment had reached multi-year bearishness in 2013 and that continues into 2014. Contrarian investors would look at this as a sign of a bottom since we must be running out of people who are still selling bonds.

011414i.gif

Chart provided courtesy of www.sentimentrader.com, analysis by TSP Talk

A rally in bonds, which may or may not come in conjunction with more selling in stocks, could be short-lived or may last a while, but you can see by the chart above that sentiment can change quickly once there is a rally. With the breakout from the recent downtrend, it is possible that a new rising trend may have started in bonds, so we'll see if investors do jump on a rally and send sentiment up toward the overly bullish line at some point. When sentiment is this bearish the rallies can be explosive because the old bond bears are so plentiful that there could be a stampede to buy.

Read more in today's TSP Talk Plus Report. We post more charts and indicators, plus discuss the Sentiment Survey Results and its System. For more information on how to gain access and a list of the benefits of being a subscriber, please go to: www.tsptalk.com/plus.php

Thanks for reading! We'll see you back here tomorrow.

Tom Crowley


Posted daily at TSP Talk Market Commentary

The legal stuff: This information is for educational purposes only! This is not advice or a recommendation. We do not give investment advice. Do not act on this data. Do not buy, sell or trade the funds mentioned herein based on this information. We may trade these funds differently than discussed above. We use additional methods and strategies to determine fund positions.
 
You keep showing that 1929 chart and it has been driving me batty as the y and likely the x axis have been manipulated to look similar. Finally need to say something. The magnitude of the movements on the Y-axis are completely different. The difference between the 28-29 trough and peak indicates a roughly 200% change from trough to peak, whereas the current change is just over 100%. We are talking about percentages and at our current index levels that is a BIG, BIG, B-I-G difference. If the guys putting this chart together normalized the y-axis a comparison between these charts would look silly, at best. Also, there is no mention of dates on the x-axis, rendering that component completely useless...without the additional information. It could be they match but with the information provided one cannot definitively ascertain that. Given the treatment to the y-axis, I have serious doubts about the integrity of the unknown x-axis. Manipulating the data the way they have, one could compare basically any time period.

Ultimately the x-axis is irrelevant because for the y-axis to actually match we would need to have made roughly double the gains over the indicated time period meaning we'd be sitting close to S&P 30,000. Now THAT would be a bubble worth worrying about...if you could get yourself past the irrational exuberance!!
 
Last edited:
I get the concerns. We talked a little about that in the forum last week. I don't know if you ever read the article by the guy who put that together. He writes:

The criticisms of that 1929 analog tend to fall into 3 general categories:

  1. The scaling is different, and so the comparison is wrong.
  2. The fundamentals are different, and so the comparison is wrong.
  3. Someone can take any 2 periods and put them on a chart to make them look the same.

I look at it as entertainment with a mix of, "if it does happen, at least we knew about it", but the chances are remote as I keep saying.

More info: A Review of Analogs - Free Weekly Technical Analysis Chart - McClellan Financial
 
Back
Top