Who is this guy?

(On the lighter side)

Obama kept a promise: Dogged diversions

Ron Hart
ROSEMARY BEACH, Fla. — Instead of covering the understandable outrage expressed nationwide last week by the over-taxed population through their “Tea Parties,” the major media diverted our attention.

s And what better way to make people like you than to have a puppy?


I know guys who have actually borrowed puppies to walk around the park in anticipation of women coming up to them and thinking they are so sweet just because they have a dog. It works.

This is nothing new. Pedophiles and politicians have long used puppies for bait. Michael Jackson’s neighbors were not sure for years if Neverland Ranch was a petting zoo or a middle school.

After a busy week of kicking some Somali pirate booty (in one of the few Obama decisions I agree with), Obama got his family a dog. I still believe that he OK’d the shooting of the pirates because they are big on no taxes, they like guns, are independent, enterprising and have a lot of money.

Besides, they were skewing Republican anyway. He had them shot, not because they were thugs who tried to control everything, but because he thought they were capitalists. That troubles Obama more than anything.

For months Obama said that he was going to get a shelter dog (I call them “pound dogs” and Michael Vick called them “contestants”). Politically correct folks now like to call them “rescue dogs,” since this makes them out to be heroic — you know, just like they do when they “rescue” poor people, seals, whales, the environment, banks and insurance companies.

The common theme is that they always do it with your money.

With creative wordplay, I notice that many terms used by members of the Left make a stupid act seem palatable. It’s like when they spend recklessly but call it “investing” in our future. And here is some good news: We are no longer in a war with fanatic Islamic fundamentalists but rather in an “Overseas Contingency Operation,” which sounds like money you put in your shoe for safekeeping while on a European vacation.

So that clears that up.

In the end, the Obamas went about picking their dog much like they have done their entire time in office: act like they were all about “the people” but instead turn to the left, take Ted Kennedy’s advice, and get a patrician pooch called a Portuguese Water Dog.

They have now officially taken their fascination with the Kennedys to a whole new level. Obama already has his FDR man-crush on by extending this recession with protectionist spending. I predict Obama will pay tribute to his third hero, Abe Lincoln, by driving his wife insane over time.

They considered taking the advice of another one of their aristocratic, political class friends, Nancy Pelosi, and picking a rich lapdog (like her husband) — or a Shar-Pei. The wrinkled Shar-Pei dog had a hard time being Pelosi’s dog, as she could not resist the compulsion to give it some of her Botox injections.

Sadly, the Chosen One (not Obama but the Portuguese Water Dog, which is, according to Wikipedia, a very independent “working dog” that swims well and likes to herd fish into nets for food) did not immediately hit it off with the Obamas. “Bo” exhibited industrious characteristics that would provide food to many of his choosing, and Barack would have none of that in his house.

Through legislation, he has taken from the dog the fruits of his work to distribute to more shiftless and dependent dogs that choose not go after their own food but which do vote heavily for Democrats in every election.

However, Ted Kennedy was able to make a compelling case to the Obamas for the fish-herding dog “Bo,” as he has also learned the politically imperative survival value of swimming well under pressure.

The puppy “Bo” is young, inexperienced, idealistic, has never made an important decision of consequence, and — in further keeping with Obama and the rest of his cabinet appointees — he suddenly finds himself in way over his head. But, like Obama himself, the cute part will divert the attention of a willing media that is vested in his success.

As Jimmy Fallon points out, it was about time Sasha and Malia got the dog their dad promised them. They were tiring of throwing Frisbees at Vice President Joe Biden.

In fairness to the Obamas, they did better than their predecessors in this area. The last dog in a Democratic White House left a lot of inexplicable stains on the Oval Office floor. :cheesy:

Ron Hart is a Southern Libertarian humor columnist.
http://columbiadailyherald.com/articles/2009/04/24/opinion/02hart.txt
 
Medicare is a tougher nut to crack. Only real health care reform from top to bottom will be the solution there. the cost of medical care in the US is double most other nations. We've got to do what they do- a single payer system, in order to bring costs under control. Our quality of care is way below many other nations- we can bring quality up and costs down by eliminating all the middle men who run up costs and add nothing to the quality of care.

That statement should provoke a few to comment..... :-)

(Yes, I do love a good verbal debate..)

If you think health care in America is expensive now, just wait until it's free under UHC!
 
http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/E9-2488.htm

We'll have to wait and see what the lawyers make of the above link.

Presidential Determination No. 2009-15 of January 27,
2009


Unexpected Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs
Related To Gaza

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

But I know we can depend on the honesty of the Hamas not to lie and take advantage of this. :rolleyes: But regardless, we have poor people in this country that are Americans and don't hate this country that are just as in dire need for food, shelter and clean water. Take care of our own first, not those that cheered when they brought down the Twin Towers.

CB
Regardless if any of this is true or not..this is a fact here and you are spot on this one, Lonesome Dove..
 

http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/E9-2488.htm

We'll have to wait and see what the lawyers make of the above link.

Presidential Determination No. 2009-15 of January 27,
2009


Unexpected Urgent Refugee and Migration Needs
Related To Gaza

Memorandum for the Secretary of State

But I know we can depend on the honesty of the Hamas not to lie and take advantage of this. :rolleyes: But regardless, we have poor people in this country that are Americans and don't hate this country that are just as in dire need for food, shelter and clean water. Take care of our own first, not those that cheered when they brought down the Twin Towers.

CB
 
20 Million for Hamas Refugees to the USA
Try and tell the American people that Obama doesn’t have ties to the Islamic terrorist world.

Obama funds $20M tax payer dollars to immigrate Hamas Refugees to the USA

This is the news that didn’t make the headlines…

By executive order, President Barack Obama has ordered the expenditure of $20.3 million in migration assistance to the Palestinian refugees and conflict victims in Gaza. The “presidential determination” which allows hundreds of thousands of Palestinians with ties to Hamas to resettle in the United States was signed on January 27 and appeared in the Federal Register on February 4th.

Few on Capitol Hill took note that the order provides a free ticket replete with housing and food allowances to individuals who have displayed their overwhelming support of the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) in the parliamentary election of January 2006.

A review of Barack Obama’s most recent actions since he was inaugurated a little more than two weeks ago:

His first call to any head of state as president was to Mahmoud Abbas, leader of Fatah party in the Palestinian territory.

His first one-on-one interview with any news organization was with Al Arabia television.

He ordered Guantanamo Bay closed and all military trials of detainees halted.

He ordered all overseas CIA interrogation centers closed.

He withdrew all charges against the masterminds behind the USS Cole and 9/11.

Now we learn that he is allowing hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refuges to move to and live in the US at American taxpayer expense.

NOTE: To verify for yourself: http://www.thefederalregister.com/d....-02-04-E9-2488

Why don't we take care of our own people first. :confused: Things that make ya go hmmmmmm.


CB
 
The three Treasury nominees announced Sunday will each face Senate confirmation.

Mr. Krueger, a longtime Princeton economics professor, was chief economist at the Labor Department under President Clinton. Mr. Krueger wrote a column on economics for The New York Times from 2000 to 2006 and is a contributor to Economix, a Times blog.

Mr. Cohen was until recently a partner in the law firm of WilmerHale, working primarily on civil litigation, white-collar criminal defense, internal investigations and anti-money laundering counseling.

And Mr. Wallace was previously a managing director at Barclays Capital. From 1989 to 1994 he served as a legislative aide to George Mitchell, who was then Senate majority leader.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/09/us/politics/09talkshows.html?_r=1&hp
 
At the DOD it can be a minimum 60 to 90 day contract review process, before a new contract is awarded, when bid upon and that's only if there is no grievance from the losing contractors. And that 60 to 90 day period only starts after legal has reviewed the contract, to ensure all Federal regs, race, gender, small business, handicapped, union regs, etc are covered and allowed in the contract. That also takes a minimum of 2 or 3 months.

The new in air fuel tanker is a perfact example of the stumbling blocks that arise from a bid contract. And just think if FEMA had to bid out all the recovery work for recovery work on a major disaster, before starting. Most folks think it takes way to long now for FEMA to move, but the Feds can only move into an area when asked by the Governor.

So no-bid contracts have it's place in the Federal government and anything to save money is great, but I can just see the public whining like a bunch of little girls, when the reason they aren't getting what they have normally gotten in the past fairly quickly, takes a minimum of 60 to 90 days, if things run like clockwork.

So that comment was pretty naive and just being the federal gov't, makes for inefficiencies and waste.

CB
 
2EASY -

"The move could save taxpayers about $40 billion a year by making the process more competitive by minimizing no-bid contracts."


The devil is in the details. Many no-bid contracts actually save the government money and time because the product or service being procured by the government is usually (a) priced virtually the same by all producers or providers; or (b) is only offered by one producer or provider, thereby eliminating the usefulness of "bidding" out a contract.

Obviously there are other variables involved, to include emergency or contingency contracting, wherein by the very nature of the need to procure something the greater good to the government is served by expeditiously procuring the product or service rather than waiting several weeks/months/years to go through a traditional bidding out of a contract.

No-bid contracts have a legitimate place in both private and public contracting. I don't discount that some no-bid contracts have been associated with fraudulent activity; however, a great populist line like "we're not going to subsidize the corporate fat cats with no-bid contracts anymore!" sounds great at first blush, but a little analysis of the reasoning behind no-bid contracts reveals it's a little bit more complicated than that. Bottom line: I wouldn't start counting that supposed $40 billion savings windfall just yet. I suspect any significant changes to the procurement process will offset any expected savings (that magical $40b figure) through more costs borne by the government, less product or services being delivered (or inferiority creep) and much longer lag time between identification of a need to actually have that need being delivered. Just my opinion, your mileage may vary.
 
Yeah, why bother risking your money in the market, when Obama is going to take a significant percentage of your capital gains?

Where were these comments on Bush during 2008? Anyway, I am suprised nobody has mentioned the fact that president Obama is changing how government contracts are awarded and who can earn them. The move could save taxpayers about $40 billion a year by making the process more competitive by minimizing no-bid contracts.
 
Kneale: Is Obama Out of His Freakin' Mind?


At the risk of redundancy I'll ask it again: Is he? Is President Obama effin' CRAZY?

President Obama blames the continuing global financial crisis for the unmitigated carnage on Monday, when the Dow fell below 7000 and closed down 300 points (or 4.2 percent) at a 12-year low of 6763.

Bullspit! The man is in denial. By now we know the economy is ailing. The main thing that has changed: The disturbing details of Obama’s tax-and-spend plans are becoming all too clear.

Most of the moves he has made in his first 43 days in office have been bad for the markets, damaging to investors, ill-advised for the economy and detrimental to repairing the financial collapse wracking the entire planet.

Yesterday Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told a House committee the new budget’s “single most overriding priority” is to “stimulate private investment.” Yet Bam proposes to more than double the tax rate on hedge funds and private equity funds, engines of private-sector growth.

http://www.cnbc.com//id/29510052?__source=yahoo|headline|quote|text|&par=yahoo

CB
Yeah, why bother risking your money in the market, when Obama is going to take a significant percentage of your capital gains?
 
Kneale: Is Obama Out of His Freakin' Mind?


At the risk of redundancy I'll ask it again: Is he? Is President Obama effin' CRAZY?

President Obama blames the continuing global financial crisis for the unmitigated carnage on Monday, when the Dow fell below 7000 and closed down 300 points (or 4.2 percent) at a 12-year low of 6763.

Bullspit! The man is in denial. By now we know the economy is ailing. The main thing that has changed: The disturbing details of Obama’s tax-and-spend plans are becoming all too clear.

Most of the moves he has made in his first 43 days in office have been bad for the markets, damaging to investors, ill-advised for the economy and detrimental to repairing the financial collapse wracking the entire planet.

Yesterday Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told a House committee the new budget’s “single most overriding priority” is to “stimulate private investment.” Yet Bam proposes to more than double the tax rate on hedge funds and private equity funds, engines of private-sector growth.

http://www.cnbc.com//id/29510052?__source=yahoo|headline|quote|text|&par=yahoo

CB
 
Where would he have served? Haiti for two weeks? Bah. I can tell you nothing was going on when he was of draft age. He would have been in middle school for Vietnam, and he was too old for Kuwait/IraqI. Ok, he could have sat at the German or Korean border, but we had plenty of people to do that at the time. Remember, at the time we thought all we needed was a couple people ready to push a button if the Russians got ansy.

In 1973, the draft ended and the U.S. converted to an All-Volunteer military.

Obama's birthday was August 4, 1961, making him 19 years old in 1980.
Since 1980, there have been many opportunities for him to have served
if he had ever felt so inclined. I suppose he never got "ansy". :D

View attachment 5956
View attachment 5957
 
Where would he have served? Haiti for two weeks? Bah. I can tell you nothing was going on when he was of draft age. He would have been in middle school for Vietnam, and he was too old for Kuwait/IraqI. Ok, he could have sat at the German or Korean border, but we had plenty of people to do that at the time. Remember, at the time we thought all we needed was a couple people ready to push a button if the Russians got ansy.
 
Theirs an old saying in the army " Lead, follow or get out of the way. So all you Obama bashers out there "get out of the way". Just like Rush, all you are doing is running minds into the ground.
Obama wouldn't know anything about your "old army saying".

He never served!
 
Theirs an old saying in the army " Lead, follow or get out of the way. So all you Obama bashers out there "get out of the way". Just like Rush, all you are doing is running minds into the ground.
Thanks 2EASY. I felt the same way about the Bush bashers. We may disagree with their policies, and we can protest that, but you're right, it's not very productive to dog the president's every move. Now c'mon BHO, do something we can all be proud of! :)
 
I think it goes; Lead, Follow, or get the HELL out of the way..

Anyways..I agree..I'm giving Him a chance for his CHANGE to work.;)
 
Theirs an old saying in the army " Lead, follow or get out of the way. So all you Obama bashers out there "get out of the way". Just like Rush, all you are doing is running minds into the ground.





Recession is when your neighbor loses his job.

Depression is when you lose yours.
Recovery is when Obama loses his.




 
Back
Top