The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com
Please read our AutoTracker policy on the IFT deadline and remaining active. Thanks!
$ - Premium Service Content (Info) | AutoTracker Monthly Winners | Is Gmail et al, Blocking Our emails?
Find us on: Facebook & X | Posting Copyrighted Material
Join the TSP Talk AutoTracker: How to Get Started | Login | Main AutoTracker Page
The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com ...
Or you can now use TapaTalk again!
Futures are UP!![]()
Yup they keep pumping. Here is today's pump. I suppose this could be why the market futures turned or it was Larry pumping a tax plan that could come out some time this year. I.e. Date to be determined but it looks good for now since Trade 1.0 was signed. They need something for future pumps in case the market starts to go down or settle if there isn't any Trade 2.0 news.Don't fight the Fed... FED Pumps $82 Billion MORE... https://www.wsj.com/articles/fed-adds-82-billion-to-financial-markets-11579016506
Tempted to rebalance to 100% C, don't want to burn the IFT to do it. Still, S is supposed to perform best in January... maybe a late bloomer this year?
Actually the "S" fund has gone up $1.62 vs. "C" fund at $1.48 for the month. But the "C" fund has the better percentage increase for the month, 3.14% vs. 2.87%. The "C" fund started at 47.2602 per share and as of 1/18/20 it was at 48.7434 per share. While the "S" fund started the year at 56.2759 per share and as of 1/18/20 it was at 57.8913 per share.
That said, isn't the percentage growth preferable to the higher dollar value? Given the same dollar value at purchase, at the end of the day the greater percentage increase would have the greater value overall (albeit with more shares).