budnipper1
Active member
That's always confused me about the postal service. The usual rules of supply and demand say that when demand is down, supply goes up so prices go down. When demand is up, supply goes down, which increases prices. The Post Office raises prices when demand is down, thus pushing demand further down. It's like they have the mentality of OPEC.
Like most other beauracracies, the normal rules of business accountability do not exist or apply. I think it would probably be more accurate to compare the mentality of USPS management to the good old boy methods of Congress instead of OPEC. There's Postmaster Potter, who spends his days sitting in his plush office, looking to find ways to justify the existence of his position at the next Senate hearing. His last attempt, the Postal Reform Plan, was about as effective as the recent "Rescue" finance bill that was passed.
Under Potter, there are thousands of upper and middle-management corporate "title-holders". The majority of them obtained their jobs kissing up to anybody and everybody who could help them climb the ladder. And so on, down the line.
The postal service needs another Postmaster like Marvin (Carvin') Runyon. In the early '90's, he eliminated (carved) a bunch of those useless, non-productive jobs and put the USPS back in the black ink. Since he left, they've gone downhill and right back to where they were before, blaming the lowest of the food chain, labor, for their failures. Do I sound cynical? Good! That was my intent.:cheesy:
http://www.usps.com/history/rbioa.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marvin_T._Runyon