budnipper1
TSP Pro
- Reaction score
- 17
I don't think anyone has suggested just because someone has subscribed to a service that their IFT's should be hidden. However, if an individual is using a subscription service to make their moves, it is incumbent upon them to avoid posting their moves in a manner that reveals the content of the subscription service.
SkyPilot...I believe you and I are probably on about the same page on this issue, but if you scroll down through this thread, you'll find numerous comments conspiring to exactly that line of thought. In fact, the majority of the comments within this thread eventually lead up to hiding IFT's of paying subscribers or expelling them from the tracker altogether.

Here are three examples:
http://www.tsptalk.com/mb/showpost.php?p=120765&postcount=12
/quote:
When thinking about any change to the Automated Tracker, please follow the "simple solution" is the best. That simple solution is to follow rule six; do not track any member who pays for a TSP service. If you pay for any TSP service you are not in the tracker. This is the simple solution. We do not have the resources to differentiate between those that follow sometimes, those that follow all the time but use different funds, and those that follow but go to G fund safety and never the F fund. This just complicates the tracking work, and does not eliminate the policing of violators.
http://www.tsptalk.com/mb/showpost.php?p=121194&postcount=30
/quote:
I just implemented the feature that the autotracker is now capable of blocking the paid members with their last three transactions and returns the same same as the paid services.
http://www.tsptalk.com/mb/showpost.php?p=121203&postcount=32
/quote:
I believe that this is a good way to keep both paid and non-paid members on the same chart. Some comments I read here (GGal and Fundsurfer) that it may be a good way to block out certain parts of the info from paid members but will keep them on the tally.