Smoking Gun: BofA-Docs Show "INTENTIONAL FRAUD FOR PROFIT"

Smoking Gun: BofA-Docs Show "INTENTIONAL FRAUD FOR PROFIT"

It turns out that the docs released by "Anonymous" this week show a smoking gun- Bank of America creating INTENTIONAL FRAUD FOR PROFIT by altering documents, and issuing "re-insurnce" forced payments in order to make more money.

Source: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x675928

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhFvZRT7Ds0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7af-phKp4f4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyew29DsxRc
 
Last edited:
Smoking Gun: BofA-Docs Show "INTENTIONAL FRAUD FOR PROFIT"

It turns out that the docs released by "Anonymous" this week show a smoking gun- Bank of America creating INTENTIONAL FRAUD FOR PROFIT by altering documents, and issuing "re-insurnce" forced payments in order to make more money.

Source: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x675928

Democratic Underground?

My question:
Is Obomba The perpetual vacationer is part of the machine?
 
Democratic Underground?

My question:
Is Obomba The perpetual vacationer is part of the machine?

After I watched this clip I began to wonder, even after seeing him speak in person.
But really, can you name anyone who would really want that job during these times?
It's a guaranteed beat-down for a centrist.
It'd be much more effective and unifying to beat-down the banksters, don'tcha think?
 
After I watched this clip I began to wonder, even after seeing him speak in person.
But really, can you name anyone who would really want that job during these times?
It's a guaranteed beat-down for a centrist.
It'd be much more effective and unifying to beat-down the banksters, don'tcha think?

of course, but the problem is the banksters beat back. not so think as you easy it is.
 
...
It'd be much more effective and unifying to beat-down the banksters, don'tcha think?

of course, but the problem is the banksters beat back. not so think as you easy it is.
And that is the heart of the problem. They're so big that nobody can touch them. As much as we'd like to place political blame, in my opinion big banking is one of the biggest reasons globally for the situation we find ourselves in today. So what do we do about that? Is there a real world answer? Would it even be possible to implement something to try to remedy the problem?
 
And that is the heart of the problem. They're so big that nobody can touch them. As much as we'd like to place political blame, in my opinion big banking is one of the biggest reasons globally for the situation we find ourselves in today. So what do we do about that? Is there a real world answer? Would it even be possible to implement something to try to remedy the problem?

If big banking has big politics in their back pocket the remedy lies in getting politicians in office who are not in the banksters pay or power that will uphold our laws and pass legisation to keep big banking under control.

Unfortunately the two party system is gamed by the powers to keep people distracted and at one another's throats over many issues while the power mongers freely fleece the We the People.

Because as a people we are sundered by all types of differences the real threat moves among us with little or no hinderance.

A third way, of devoted, honest, patriotic movement with the only the People in mind is the only hope, but as if it is not too late to achieve this I dont know. Obama, unfortunately appears to be a tool, he has done nothing but divide us more extremely than ever.
 
An Advocate Who Scares Republicans
The Wednesday morning hearing was titled “Oversight of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.” The only witness was the piñata, otherwise known as Elizabeth Warren, the Harvard law professor hired last year by President Obama to get the new bureau — the only new agency created by the Dodd-Frank financial reform law — up and running. She may or may not be nominated by the president to serve as its first director when it goes live in July, but in the here and now she’s clearly running the joint.

And thus the real purpose of the hearing: to allow the Republicans who now run the House to box Ms. Warren about the ears. The big banks loathe Ms. Warren, who has made a career out of pointing out all the ways they gouge financial consumers — and whose primary goal is to make such gouging more difficult. So, naturally, the Republicans loathe her too. That she might someday run this bureau terrifies the banks. So, naturally, it terrifies the Republicans.

The banks and their Congressional allies have another, more recent gripe. Rather than waiting until July to start helping financial consumers, Ms. Warren has been trying to help them now. Can you believe the nerve of that woman?
Nocera-popup.jpg
 
Is there a real world answer? Would it even be possible to implement something to try to remedy the problem?

yeah, it's called decline to do credit. if you don't got it in your pocket to buy it then you can't afford it.

the funny money has no value until you pay for it. find as many other ways to trade as you can, do not pay a remote someone for the privilege of exchange.
 

March 19, 2011, 12:36 pm Heroes As Villains: The Case of Elizabeth Warren

Joe Nocera has a good piece about the demonization of Elizabeth Warren; it’s something remarkable to watch. In a sane world, Warren — who warned about consumer debt before it was fashionable, and in particular warned about the abusive lending practices that played a significant role in the buildup of that debt — would be an icon of reform. But to listen to the GOP, she’s a power-mad usurper of individual rights, a threat to the solvency of our financial system.


As Nocera points out, this attack needs to be seen in the context of the GOP attempt to undermine any and all financial reform. And the GOP has it in especially for anyone who got it right: since they’re trying to sell a narrative in which the financial crisis was somehow generated by too much government intervention, not too little, and the bankers were just helpless victims, they especially need to demonize the people who called the actual route to ruin as it was happening.


And it’s not just the Republicans: Warren has clearly faced a lot of hostility from within the administration, too. And as I see it, this also comes precisely because she was right: that gives her the kind of credibility that, in turn, makes her something of an independent force — which some people don’t like at all.


The republican demonization of Elizabeth Warren-



Sad, sad times our nation is in.


more: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/19/heroes-as-villains-the-case-of-elizabeth-warren/
 
After I watched this clip I began to wonder, even after seeing him speak in person.
But really, can you name anyone who would really want that job during these times?
It's a guaranteed beat-down for a centrist.
It'd be much more effective and unifying to beat-down the banksters, don'tcha think?

Seeing is believing. The 2008 Dem campaign got a big donation from the Goldsacks Man, didnt they.

So it is kinda hard to see that they arent all in the same bed together.
 
Seeing is believing. The 2008 Dem campaign got a big donation from the Goldsacks Man, didnt they.

So it is kinda hard to see that they arent all in the same bed together.

probably just one bed, changing the sheets when it gets nasty. :sick:
 
Of course... everything wrong with America is the GOPs fault...

Ok, here's where you come in!
Write congresspeople and senators, pick your party, tell them we need fiscal accountability for financial institutions and the too big to fail banks that can threaten the entire WORLD economy when they ::oops:: make a miscalculation with our deposits.
Who cares if Elizabeth Warren is LW, RW, Chicken Wing, as long as she has the power to save our collective financial asses from the capitalize the gains, socialize the losses, TBTF financial grim reapers.
You could say something like-
enough of the same old RW mantra, gays, guns, and god- plenty of time for those debates,
We need jobs. Where are the jobs?
Tell them you want infrastructure projects that employ thousands with good pay and use all the technology developed by the defense and aerospace industries we can muster to prepare us for the next 100 years,
(that would be during your generation) with at least a substantial amount of fabrication done here in the US to get our factories running again.
Say that while ideological battles can always be fought, you biggest worry is how to support a family, and even though national debt is piling high, if we don't start producing more goods on US soil, all we are doing is sending our hard earned dollars overseas, because the real money is made in manufacturing, not resale.
More jobs=more tax revenue=more debt paid down.
Tell them the wealthy Americans got where they are by virtue of the most supportive nation on earth, and they can contribute to sustainability by investing in America's future, so the tax cuts for millionaires, billionaires, and mega trans-national corporations must undergo restructuring.
And tell your friends.
If you don't think a wide portion of the Left is doing this every day, you are mistaken.
We can remain divided and stay unproductive, or find common ground and force our elected officials to represent our voice.
Try it, it feels good- ;)
 
yeah, it's called decline to do credit. if you don't got it in your pocket to buy it then you can't afford it.

the funny money has no value until you pay for it. find as many other ways to trade as you can, do not pay a remote someone for the privilege of exchange.

Hmmm. you have a very good point and I am going to start a survey/results thread based on it.
 
Back
Top