Significant oil spill- Montana-

James48843

TSP Talk Royalty
Reaction score
909
There has been a significant oil spill starting early this morning with a broken pipeline into the Yellowstone River in Montana:

http://billingsgazette.com/news/loc...b8-aeca-c24581dd4de1.html?oCampaign=hottopics


oil.jpg

An oil spill on the Yellowstone River prompted evacuations from Laurel to Lockwood early Saturday morning. Local officials had few details as of 2 a.m. as they continued to investigate what spilled and how, but people in the area said the stench of oil was strong, and the water was black and oily.


In the Duck Creek area, thick black oil could be seen bubbling up from under the Duck Creek bridge. Some oil was washing up on the banks of the river, but most of it appeared to be following the main flow of the river.


Oil could be smelled as far away from the river as a half-mile.


Starting around midnight, county officials were notifying residents along the river that they should evacuate. A Yellowstone County Sheriff's deputy in the Duck Creek area said around 1 a.m. that the evacuation stretches from Thiel Road and Highway 212 South at Laurel to the Blue Creek area.

The Blue Creek Fire Department was called just after 1:15 a.m. to assist in the evacuation. Dispatchers were beginning to call residents in the Huntley area just after 2:30 a.m.

 
Last edited:
Re: Significan oil spill- Yellowstone River North Dakota-

Note- can a MOD please fix the title of this thread- the spill is in montana, not north dakota. My bad. Thanks,.
 
Re: Significan oil spill- Yellowstone River North Dakota-

Note- can a MOD please fix the title of this thread- the spill is in montana, not north dakota. My bad. Thanks,.

Jeez Jim, read your posts before you click the submit reply button. Use the Preview Post button and actually read it no matter how exited you are. Hundreds of people now believe North Dakota is a vast oil soaked wasteland.
 
Re: Significan oil spill- Yellowstone River North Dakota-

Note- can a MOD please fix the title of this thread- the spill is in montana, not north dakota. My bad. Thanks,.

And MODs..While you're at it, define Signafican..Is that in Canada?:laugh:
 
Re: Significan oil spill- Yellowstone River North Dakota-

Exxon claims spill damage limited, gov. doubtful


LAUREL, Mont. (AP) -- Authorities struggled Sunday to gauge the environmental and crop damage from tens of thousands of gallons of oil that spilled into the legendary Yellowstone River, as Montana's governor criticized Exxon Mobil for downplaying the possible scope of the disaster.


A break in a company pipeline near Laurel fouled miles of riverbank and forced municipalities and irrigation districts to close intakes across eastern Montana.Exxon Mobil brought in more cleanup workers to mop up crude at three sites along the flooded river that were coated with thick globs of crude. Yet there was no clear word on how far the damage extended along a scenic river famous for its fishing and vital to farmers who depend on its water for their crops.


The uncertainty frustrated riverfront property owners such as Linda Corbin, who worried that severe damage would be revealed as the flooding Yellowstone recedes in coming weeks. The stench of spilled crude was obvious in Corbin's backyard -- a reminder of the potential problems lurking beneath the surface of the nearby river.
"The smell has been enough to gag a maggot," said Corbin, 64. "I just hope it doesn't come too far because I'm on a well, and I won't appreciate having to shower in Exxon oil."

More:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Exxon...tml?x=0&sec=topStories&pos=main&asset=&ccode=
 
Re: Significan oil spill- Yellowstone River North Dakota-

Jeez Jim, read your posts before you click the submit reply button. Use the Preview Post button and actually read it no matter how exited you are. Hundreds of people now believe North Dakota is a vast oil soaked wasteland.

My mis spelling of excited speaks volumes about heeding my own advice. Perhaps I exited too quickly. :embarrest:
 
Back
Top