Maybe this is a simplistic question but why not privatize the TSP function?
Why can't we roll our 401k accounts to approved outside brokerage service providers that follow the same rules that TSP follows?
Economic theory and history informs that competition will encourage better more flexible services at ever greater efficiencies and lower cost. Our society is built on this notion. Even If TSP had some form of competition we could be guaranteed better services and they would might even solicit input from their customers on occasions!
In addition, privatizing TSP would allow those who want 1-trade a year and ultralow expenses to find a broker with that offering; and those who want and need more flexibility can find a broker with a wider range of services and investment options.
If privatization is not possible then why not at least representation? Why are the TSP board member appointed instead of being voted in by the members? We are the stake holders and we have no voice.
Why can't we roll our 401k accounts to approved outside brokerage service providers that follow the same rules that TSP follows?
Economic theory and history informs that competition will encourage better more flexible services at ever greater efficiencies and lower cost. Our society is built on this notion. Even If TSP had some form of competition we could be guaranteed better services and they would might even solicit input from their customers on occasions!
In addition, privatizing TSP would allow those who want 1-trade a year and ultralow expenses to find a broker with that offering; and those who want and need more flexibility can find a broker with a wider range of services and investment options.
If privatization is not possible then why not at least representation? Why are the TSP board member appointed instead of being voted in by the members? We are the stake holders and we have no voice.