Oil Slick Stuff

Most important on that score is that oil prices are finally falling. The weak dollar had been one factor in rising oil prices. But now that oil prices are on the decline, inflation pressures are easing somewhat.

Hmmm. At least, that's what the word is on main street. I have a feeling that there are other Hedge Funds/Mutual Funds besides SemGroup that are in trouble over their bets on Commodities. Janus got waaayy overweight Commodities after getting destroyed when the Tech Bubble burst.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/sto...3F450-8AD3-4023-9958-4D5305E4836F}&dist=msr_1

Janus is just one fund company of the thousands that were probably pressured into jumping onto commodities just as things began to get euphoric. Better them than me, I don't invest in things meant for consumption.

Speaking of Cause and Effect.... Wasn't it the two Bear Sterns hedge funds about a year ago that, in hindsight, were the signal to get the heck outta stocks?
 
Hmmm. At least, that's what the word is on main street. I have a feeling that there are other Hedge Funds/Mutual Funds besides SemGroup that are in trouble over their bets on Commodities. Janus got waaayy overweight Commodities after getting destroyed when the Tech Bubble burst.

http://www.marketwatch.com/news/sto...3F450-8AD3-4023-9958-4D5305E4836F}&dist=msr_1

Janus is just one fund company of the thousands that were probably pressured into jumping onto commodities just as things began to get euphoric. Better them than me, I don't invest in things meant for consumption.

Speaking of Cause and Effect.... Wasn't it the two Bear Sterns hedge funds about a year ago that, in hindsight, were the signal to get the heck outta stocks?
Those Boys have been sticken' it to us while TRYING to make a buck. Do you think they felt bad about it when the dough was streaming in? NO!:suspicious:
 
DRILL, DRILL, DRILL!!!:D

Gingrich: GOP ready to shut government down over drilling

  • Republicans continue protests calling for vote on offshore oil drilling measure
    Democrats blocked vote on measure before Congress went into recess
    GOP is considering a government shutdown to force a vote, Gingrich says
  • Democrats say they will not allow government to be shut down
1x1pixel.gif
By Lisa Desjardins
CNN Radio

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- He led Republicans into government shutdowns in the 1990s, and now, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich indicates his party is seriously considering another shutdown threat to force a vote on offshore oil drilling in September.
art.gingrich.gi.jpg
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich is drawing attention to a Republican call for offshore oil drilling.

House Republicans brought Gingrich to the Capitol on Wednesday, partly to revive media coverage of their speech-making protest in the chamber, now in its fourth day.
The rest of Congress is gone for August recess, but several Republican House members have been speaking on the floor of the closed-down chamber, calling for a special session to vote on drilling and energy.
Gingrich did attract more camera crews, and he used the opportunity to point to what may be the GOP's next strategy: If Democrats refuse to hold a separate vote on oil drilling, Republicans could try to block the votes needed to keep government running past September 30.
"Are [Democrats] really prepared to close the government in order to stop drilling?" Gingrich asked. "Because I think the country will find that to be a suicidal strategy."
The precise maneuvering of a shutdown threat is complicated, but it revolves around the fact that key government spending bills expire when the fiscal year ends September 30 and Congress must vote next month to keep the government operating.
One of those spending bills, for the Department of the Interior, contains the hot-button provision banning offshore oil drilling on the outer continental shelf. If that bill expires, as it is set to do at the end of September, then so does the drilling ban. Republicans believe a majority of the House opposes the ban, and thus a vote on whether to keep government running could also become a vote on whether to allow offshore drilling.
video.gif
The parliamentary possibilities are numerous. But Republican House Leader John Boehner's office thinks the votes are there, on both sides of the Capitol, to support drilling and energy expansion. Boehner spokesman Kevin Smith confirmed there are many options on the table for September, including a shutdown threat.


"If Democrats want to block what a majority of the House and Senate want, they can proceed with a strategy that would in effect shut down the government," Smith said.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office responded quickly with a statement from spokesman Nadeam Elshami. "Democrats will not shut down the government," he wrote, "but it is not surprising Newt Gingrich would raise that threat since he and the Republican Party shut down the government in the 1990s."
Gingrich's political game of chicken with then-President Bill Clinton led to two government shutdowns in late 1995 and early 1996. The moves backfired, and polls showed more Americans blamed Gingrich. But he defends his decisions.
"We shut the federal government down, for a brief period, in order to get a balanced budget," he told CNN Radio. "That was a deliberate systematic strategy."
Now the strategy seems to be an all-out effort to heap pressure on Pelosi, who opposes offshore oil drilling and has so far not scheduled a vote.
Democrats call the floor speeches and photo opportunities a "hoax." House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer sent out a statement saying, "Republicans are doing nothing but pushing the failed Johnny-one-note policies of the past."
But Republicans keep adding pressure. After three days of speaking under shadows in the unlit House chamber, the GOP congressmen found themselves facing six television cameras and at least three dozen reporters when Gingrich joined them Wednesday. The equivalent news conference Tuesday morning attracted a single camera and approximately 10 journalists.
Republican Conference Chairman Adam Putnam would not say how long he and his GOP mates will hold the floor. But there is a clear sense of political momentum, as well as a lot of rah-rah, among Republicans rotating in and out of the chamber.
"The energy level is high," Putnam said, "and I think we've got a lot of energy left in us, don't we?"

About 15 Republicans behind him cheered.
Gingrich pushed a broader view. "I think the energy level has shifted between the two parties in the last couple weeks," he said, "and my hunch is there are a lot of Democrats back home who are tap dancing." http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/08/06/gingrich.energy/index.html
 
Do you see that smile on Burntankle's Face?

Oil's slide eases Fed's burden

With a turn in commodity markets, pressure on Bernanke & Co. to raise interest rates slackens.

By Colin Barr, senior writer
Last Updated: August 6, 2008: 1:24 PM EDT

fed_bernanke_official.03.jpg
As the Fed struggles to manage a slowing economy and rising inflation, recent declines in the price of food and fuel could give it some needed breathing room.

barr_GAS_OIL_graphic.gif


NEW YORK (Fortune) -- The sound of air hissing out of the commodities bubble is music to Ben Bernanke's ears.
After spending the first half of the year soaring to new highs, the prices of grains, metals and energy have dropped sharply over the past month. Crude oil has dropped almost 20% since peaking at $147 a barrel on July 11, while the price of corn recently tumbled to a low not seen since the spring.
Though prices remain above their levels of a year ago, declines in the prices of food and fuel could give Fed chief Bernanke some much-needed breathing room as he struggles to balance the risk of inflation with the threat that the financial sector will be swamped by losses tied to the housing bust.
"The first leg of the decline in commodities is under our belt," says PNC economist Stuart Hoffman. He says the commodity-price decline could "take the edge off inflationary expectations," a measure that Bernanke keeps a wary eye on.
In keeping its fed funds interest-rate target steady Tuesday at 2%, the policymaking Federal Open Market Committee warned that it may yet be necessary for the Fed to raise interest rates to keep inflation under wraps.
"Inflation has been high, spurred by the earlier increases in the prices of energy and some other commodities, and some indicators of inflation expectations have been elevated," the FOMC said. "The committee expects inflation to moderate later this year and next year, but the inflation outlook remains highly uncertain."
Demand cracks [more]
http://money.cnn.com/2008/08/06/new...ties.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2008080613
 
The French are taking drastic action!!!:worried:

France to limit energy price rise


_44646457_gasring202.jpg
Consumers have seen hit by rising fuel bills


The French government has asked its energy regulator to cap electricity and gas price increases for private users to 2% and 5% respectively.
The government did not however say when the cap would come into effect.
French authorities also said cheaper social tariffs for energy would be extended to another million people.
Domestic energy suppliers in Europe have been under pressure to raise prices recently due to increasing costs of gas on wholesale markets.
In a study released in June, the British government estimated that typical French consumers paid the second cheapest gas bills out of selection of 15 EU nations.
The report looked at estimated prices paid between January and June this year in the 15 countries that made up the European community before enlargement in 2004. The study concluded that British consumers paid the cheapest gas bills when standard usage was considered. However, this did not take into account price rises announced in recent weeks by two of the big energy suppliers Centrica and EDF. http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7545989.stm
 
Ok, Ok, the chatter about Janus just created the tipping point for me. I'm going to finally set up a self-directed IRA online with one of the discount brokerages and pull accounts out of both mutual fund families I've been in for years and years, esp. Janus. Time to be able to react more quickly as far as moving funds around and diversifying. so far my Roth in the other fund family has been pretty sluggish ever since I moved into them, and tanked about 30% since their peak last year (with not much in the way of safe haven options within the ff), and Janus funds aren't far behind (they got Treasury MM option true, but KD keeps talking about how MMs can lose $ too, so I've been stymied on staying w/Janus for a couple mos now already).

Janus boobooed big time when they were doing favors for institutional clients several years ago, but I was too lethargic about setting up new accounts elsewhere and moving out so I just stayed and rode it out. Thought they had gotten their act together again finally, but apparently not. Tired of riding things out, they no sooner recover then its another rodeo and down she goes again before the 8sec horn. Arg. :mad: Ok, I'm done now. Got a plan, finally, plus the boot in the behind I needed to get moving at last. :suspicious: Thanks for the heads up, guys.
 
Sounds like a plan Alevin, new restrictions in the TSP have almost made it impossible to function in a BEAR Market or a Bull Market. Wish I had more options.:D
 
Oil rebounds after 4-week slide

Crude rises more than $1 amid concerns that new sanctions will be placed on Iran.


Last Updated: August 7, 2008: 6:11 AM EDT

SINGAPORE (AP) -- Oil prices rose Thursday in Asia to near $120 a barrel, halting a four-week slide on concerns that tension over Iran's nuclear program could lead to conflict.
Light, sweet crude for September delivery rose $1.18 to $119.76 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange by late afternoon in Singapore. The contract dropped 59 cents overnight to settle at $118.58 a barrel.
"The market has been ignoring supply-side concerns lately, but it's looking like the world powers will go forward and place more sanctions on Iran," said Victor Shum, an energy analyst with consultancy Purvin & Gertz in Singapore.
The five permanent U.N. Security Council members and Germany agreed Wednesday to pursue new sanctions against Iran, which will probably take months to implement.
Tehran has refused to curb its uranium enrichment and may be trying to run out the clock on the Bush administration in hopes of getting a better offer from a new U.S. president next year, the State Department said.
Iran says it isn't seeking nuclear weapons and won't scale back a legitimate energy-production program.
Before the rebound, Nymex front-month crude futures had fallen around 20% since reaching a record high of $147.27 on July 11.[more]
http://money.cnn.com/2008/08/07/markets/oil.ap/index.htm?postversion=2008080706
 
We knew it all along!!!:nuts:
Supply and demand turned upside down

Commentary: Commodities plunge shows it was hot money all along

By David Callaway, MarketWatch
Last update: 12:01 a.m. EDT Aug. 7, 2008

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- The commodities bubble is dead. Long live the commodities bubble.

In fact, the plunge in prices of oil, gold, corn and other commodities over the past month could easily just be an overdue correction in prices after the impossible gains of the past 12 months. And long term, we can expect that most finite resources -- like oil -- to gain in prices as we use them up.
But long term, my SUV will be dead, so let's focus on what's happened this summer. After several years among the world's best performing investments, commodities have hit one of their biggest slumps in a generation in the past few weeks.
Oil, which doubled in value over the past 12 months, is down about $30 a barrel from its $147 high, or a bit more than 20%. Gold, which traded above $1,000 an ounce in March, is now below $900. Agricultural commodities, whose price surges this past spring sent starvation warnings across the globe, have now fallen for several weeks running.
Yes, it's the law of supply and demand. But not the way most of the pundits have argued. Take oil. Nothing's really changed in supply over the past few months. And China and India - the two bugaboos of the natural resources demand equation -- haven't stopped importing. Yet prices are down 20%?
Everybody seems to be pointing to Americans driving less, and gasoline prices approaching $5 a gallon in places like California have borne this out, according to some statistical reports. But it wasn't our driving more that caused oil prices to double in the past year.
...China, India, Middle East turmoil, fat Americans in big gas guzzlers. But the real supply/demand equation that has driven this rally has been the supply of investments in commodities vs. the demand from investors to buy them.
The fact is that the supply/demand equation has always been a convenient way to describe what is happening in commodities, with ready scapegoats always available. China, India, Middle East turmoil, fat Americans in big gas guzzlers. But the real supply/demand equation that has driven this rally has been the supply of investments in commodities vs. the demand from investors to buy them.
By comparison to currencies, bonds and stocks, these are small markets -- even oil. They can easily be pushed around by walls of hot money. The amount of money flowing into commodities funds increased tenfold in the past three years, pushing up prices; just like the amount of money flowing into tech stocks in the late 1990s pushed up prices, and the amount of money flowing into U.S. houses -- cheap money -- pushed up prices. Even sovereign wealth funds, the so-called saviors of Wall Street, who stepped in to prop up tumbling investment bank stocks, have reportedly been buying commodities funds to push up the price of the commodity their governments are, in fact, selling.
Prices of oil, gold, corn, etc. have tended to move in lockstep recently, despite the fact that each commodity is affected by very different fundamentals. The single exception is that they all react to trading in the U.S. dollar, though that has been relatively flat to weak of late.
Now look at what happens when the hot money turns on commodities. A MarketWatch story earlier this week showed that last month, short positions by "non-commercial" investors -- i.e. speculators -- surpassed long positions for the first time in 17 months. See full story. Oil, of course, fell $16 a barrel in July.
And if the hot money can be believed, prices still have further to fall, as options contracts indicate that more money is now betting on declines than on a rebound. See full story.
Of course, it's easy to argue that the hot money is chasing the direction of the oil prices, or betting the trend. It's also easy to argue that it's not fundamental supply and demand but "perceived" changes in supply and demand that are really driving prices. That is, of course, the basis of all speculation in the markets.
But try to find somebody who perceives that over the long run oil is going to get a lot cheaper, or that Wall Street is going to quickly recover from its worst credit crisis in 60 years. No, the recent Wall Street play on selling oil and buying financial stocks is simply that -- a trading play -- designed for short-term profits and driven by speculation. We'll see who is buying financial stocks on Thursday after American International Group's
this is to say nothing of those who might be trying to actually manipulate prices, such as the two cases we've seen in the past few weeks brought by authorities in both the U.S. and the UK. Small cases, to be sure, but proof nonetheless that it can happen. Expect more of those as regulatory probes continue.

So let's accept that the commodities boom is just like every other Wall Street fad, and that after swinging too far one way, the hot money pendulum has swung back the other way, at least temporarily. Commodities will continue to see rallies, and Wall Street will someday recover from its credit hangover.
The easy money in these bets, though, has already been made.
greendot.gif
[More]

David Callaway is editor-in-chief of MarketWatch.


Sorry, but once the bubble bursts it's usually not going to reinflate again for quite a while. All of your 1 thru 4 were in place well before commodities took off, so, what's changed recently? Speculators getting spooked, that's what.
http://www.marketwatch.com/news/sto...x?guid={B170E16E-6F6F-4D38-B7D1-06A27E018EDE}
 
We knew it all along!!!:nuts:
Supply and demand turned upside down

Commentary: Commodities plunge shows it was hot money all along

Lesson: Don't believe the blaring headlines (read the meat and do your homework), phony baloney numbers, smoke n mirrors, and dog n pony shows the agencies and so-called "analysts" flood the media with to soothe the sheep. OPEC wasn't lying.....guess who was?:nuts::notrust:
 
U.S. Gasoline demand is actually below last year's levels.

http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/info/twip/twip_gasoline.html
and
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/wgfupus2w.htm

Perhaps more people trading in that SUV for something that gets better mileage, or, it could have to do with the swtich to E85 for flex-fuelers....

Ahhhh... if only we could get those who own E85 capable vehicles to actually use E85, we'd get a lot of relief at the pump all the way around...
trouble with E85 is that you get terrible mileage and so end up spending more for the more frequent trips to the gas station.
 
Oil rebounds after 4-week slide

Crude rises more than $1 amid concerns that new sanctions will be placed on Iran.

Last Updated: August 7, 2008: 6:11 AM EDT

SINGAPORE (AP) -- Oil prices rose Thursday in Asia to near $120 a barrel, halting a four-week slide on concerns that tension over Iran's nuclear program could lead to conflict.
Light, sweet crude for September delivery rose $1.18 to $119.76 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange by late afternoon in Singapore. The contract dropped 59 cents overnight to settle at $118.58 a barrel.
"The market has been ignoring supply-side concerns lately, but it's looking like the world powers will go forward and place more sanctions on Iran," said Victor Shum, an energy analyst with consultancy Purvin & Gertz in Singapore.
The five permanent U.N. Security Council members and Germany agreed Wednesday to pursue new sanctions against Iran, which will probably take months to implement.
Tehran has refused to curb its uranium enrichment and may be trying to run out the clock on the Bush administration in hopes of getting a better offer from a new U.S. president next year, the State Department said.
Iran says it isn't seeking nuclear weapons and won't scale back a legitimate energy-production program.[more]
http://money.cnn.com/2008/08/07/markets/oil.ap/index.htm?postversion=2008080706
How many more times are you gonna post this today???:D:rolleyes:
 
No Problem, just messin with ya..:D

I think a buck and some change ain't anything to signal and up swing of any kind..as been said before; nothing goes straight down..
 
Back
Top