nnuut's Account Talk

[Steadygain]

Here I sit BROKEN HEARTED.
Wanted to IFT and was THWARTED.
The limitations are a bunch of MUCK.
They should resend this STUPID JUNK! :nuts:

Sorry Norm - the Quote of the Week was already acknowledged.

Had you waiting a week - this one would have been the winner.

 

[Buster]

Corrected! Thank you Officer, I'll try and not let it happen again!:blink:

I wonder if she would use pink velvet handcuffs if did it again...

 

[Guest2]

Norm, Spelling Police ? Heck, the last two lines don't even rhyme.
We need the Poetry Poe-Poe. I can't do it, I'm too manly-man. :nuts:

 

[luv2read]

My my the class is rowdy this week! Is there a full moon?

Norm - I meant I don't want to see that stupid rule re-sent....unless it's to be rescinded.

I wonder if she would use pink velvet handcuffs if did it again...

Buster, with the bunny ears and tail.

 

[nasa1974]

My my the class is rowdy this week! Is there a full moon?

No! Actually we are coming into a new moon. Or, in laymen terms, moonless. :nuts:


May the force be with us.

 

[nnuut]

Norm, Spelling Police ? Heck, the last two lines don't even rhyme.
We need the Poetry Poe-Poe. I can't do it, I'm too manly-man. :nuts:

You can't blame me for the Poetry, I stole the Pentameter from a well known poem that we all know.:laugh:

 

[nnuut]

please...rescind, not resend. I don't want to see it again!

(I'm the spelling police)

Excellent rhyming Norm!

Officer just why didn't you catch my mispelling of rescind when I corrected it? Were you at the donut shop or something? Glad I caught it before you did!:embarrest:View attachment 4367

 

[Buster]

You can't blame me for the Poetry, I stole the Pentameter from a well known poem that we all know.:laugh:

Yeah, seems I've read that in the restroom a time or two..

 

[luv2read]

Officer just why didn't you catch my mispelling of rescind when I corrected it? Were you at the donut shop or something? Glad I caught it before you did!:embarrest:View attachment 4367

I saw it but decided not to belabor the point since SB pointed out that the last 2 lines don't rhyme - a word came to mind for the IFT limits that rhymes with MUCK but it's not appropriate for the MB.

Besides, I was distracted by Buster's request for pink velvet handcuffs. :laugh:

 

[Guest2]

Thanks for letting us have some fun on your thread Norm. Yes, the
adrenal glands were working overtime. Believe it or not, thats what
drove the market back up as well. Thanks again !

 

[kar_crazy]

might be a good thing you were out of IFTs might have fell in deep like me:blink::laugh:

 

[nnuut]

Looks like many BULLS fell for the BULLTRAP.View attachment 4375
Yeah, still in the "G" waiting for a turn around! Just when that happens is a Mystery to me!

 

[ATCJeff]

Looks like many BULLS fell for the BULLTRAP.View attachment 4375
Yeah, still in the "G" waiting for a turn around! Just when that happens is a Mystery to me!

But Cramer said were at the bottom.

 

[FogSailing]

BOYAAAH!!! That's why I ran to G..

FS

 

[Guest2]

But Cramer said were at the bottom.

A few other analyst said the same thing. Heck, even Mark Haines from
CNBC put out his projection. He said "15% below the current 120 day
moving average" will be the bottom. Thats 10540 on the Dow. Either
we'll catch a falling knife or we'll become long term investors (finally).
I'd certainly like to have confidence in someone other then Rick Santelli.

Oh yes, i forgot "BooYaaah"

 

[ATCJeff]

A few other analyst said the same thing. Heck, even Mark Haines from
CNBC put out his projection. He said "15% below the current 120 day
moving average" will be the bottom. Thats 10540 on the Dow. Either
we'll catch a falling knife or we'll become long term investors (finally).
I'd certainly like to have confidence in someone other then Rick Santelli.

Oh yes, i forgot "BooYaaah"

If my calculations are correct. 15% below the 120 SMA would be ~10350 on the DOW.

 

[Guest2]

If my calculations are correct. 15% below the 120 SMA would be ~10350 on the DOW.

I made a small change to my original post. It looks like the Dow 120SMA
is a 12400. If that holds true, 15% would bring us down close to 10540.
Geeez, that another 7% downer. Then again, it was only Haines!

 

[ATCJeff]

I made a small change to my original post. It looks like the Dow 120SMA
is a 12400. If that holds true, 15% would bring us down close to 10540.
Geeez, that another 7% downer. Then again, it was only Haines!

120 SMA on the DOW is 12231 according to YAHOO charts.

 

[Corepuncher]

If my calculations are correct. 15% below the 120 SMA would be ~10350 on the DOW.

Actually he said 15% below the 200 day moving average, I'm pretty sure. That would be about 10700 or so for today, but it also means we already hit that on 7/15. So according to his method, the bottom was hit in the Dow, but not QUITE there for the S&P. Then again, according to this method, we almost hit bottom back in January.

 

[ATCJeff]

A few other analyst said the same thing. Heck, even Mark Haines from
CNBC put out his projection. He said "15% below the current 120 day
moving average" will be the bottom. Thats 10540 on the Dow. Either
we'll catch a falling knife or we'll become long term investors (finally).
I'd certainly like to have confidence in someone other then Rick Santelli.

Oh yes, i forgot "BooYaaah"

Actually he said 15% below the 200 day moving average, I'm pretty sure. That would be about 10700 or so for today, but it also means we already hit that on 7/15. So according to his method, the bottom was hit in the Dow, but not QUITE there for the S&P. Then again, according to this method, we almost hit bottom back in January.

Look again.