NASA data blows gaping hole in Global Warming

NASA's agenda: remember, James Hansen (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Hansen) works for NASA. However, the article referred to humidity and (cirrus) cloud coverage. These two parameters have always been handled empirically in the models and have always been sources of uncertainty. The debate is far from over.
 
clester said:
Interesting. Thanks for sharing. I love NASA. Do they have an agenda though? You always have to question research to look for bias. I don't think they are.
Click to expand...
When reading the `comments' to the article it is amazing what bias and predjudices get revealed!
 
Interesting. Thanks for sharing. I love NASA. Do they have an agenda though? You always have to question research to look for bias. I don't think they are.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top