Looking for a manic Monday

09/26/11

Stocks waffled around most of the day on Friday as the major indices flip flopped above and below the break-even mark all day long. By the close, the Dow had gained 38-points. Considering what happened on Thursday, Friday's action was pretty uneventful.

092611.gif


For the TSP, the C-fund gained 0.62% on Friday, the S-fund was up 1.14%, the I-fund picked up 1.12%, and the F-fund (bonds) fell 0.50%.


For more on the weekly and monthly returns, please see our TSP Weekly Wrap-Up.

The modest gains on Friday did little technically to help the current situation, but it may have set up a possible historically bullish situation. I'll get to that below. The breakdown on Thursday is still the big news, and while the bear flag breakdown turned old support into possible new resistance, the August lows are still holding.

092611a.gif

Chart provided courtesy of www.decisionpoint.com, analysis by TSP Talk

The Nasdaq's 20-day EMA and the top of the open gap look like perfect relief rally targets, but the bottom of the rising wedge / bear flag could act as resistance on any rally. The resistance line is rising so I guess we could see the gap get filled within 3 or 4 days without moving above that resistance.

092611b.gif

Chart provided courtesy of www.decisionpoint.com, analysis by TSP Talk

There has been talk from the trading community about something Art Cashin mentioned on Friday. It's called the Thursday / Monday Syndrome. Art said:

"The classic Thursday/Monday syndrome starts with the kind of action we saw yesterday. The markets open under pressure and selling accelerates in swelling volume. By early afternoon, there is a virtual stampede of selling. Then, later in the session, stocks stabilize a bit based on some reassurance…

"The action on Friday (and Saturday in the case of 1929) is uneven, often ending choppily steady or somewhat weaker.

"Then on Monday, the trapdoor opens with liquidation and margin calls bringing tsunamis of selling."
- Source:
http://blogs.wsj.com/marketbeat/2011/09/23/cashin-eye-of-the-storm/

I am always leery of a theory that a lot of people are talking about, but there is some history behind it, and the outcome turns out to be bullish.

092611c.gif

Chart provided courtesy of www.sentimentrader.com

So, a nice washout today may actually set up a buying opportunity.

The latest TSP Talk Sentiment Survey came in at 29% bulls, 63% bears, for a bulls to bears ratio of 0.46 to 1. That is a buy signal so the system will remain 100% in the C-fund for this week.

The prior week's 0.98 to 1 ratio was so close to the 1.0 to 1 ratio it needed to get back into the G-fund to miss last week's big sell-off, but the system doesn't round up or down and so technically it stayed in the C-fund and took the losses. But no matter how you slice it, the current 0.46 to 1 ratio is a fresh confirmation of a buy signal for this coming week.

It's looking more to me like we have a buying opportunity coming up some time this week, but the market rarely makes it easy for us. If things get ugly today or tomorrow, it could get very tough to want to be a buyer, and not buying may be the safest thing to do. But for anyone looking to gamble (and that's what it is) and looking to catch a rally, sometimes the time to buy is when things look their worst.

Thanks for reading!
We'll see you back here tomorrow.

Tom Crowley



The legal stuff: This information is for educational purposes only! This is not advice or a recommendation. We do not give investment advice. Do not act on this data. Do not buy, sell or trade the funds mentioned herein based on this information. We may trade these funds differently than discussed above. We use additional methods and strategies to determine fund positions.







 
Looks like a greenday on tap. Probably too many calling for a drop and so, the market does the opposite. It's very bearish out there. Does anyone believe this is the start of another bull run?
 
I've been following tsptalk for a number of years. Tom does a such a great job with his daily commentaries educating all his subscribers that many may no longer fall into the novice/non-professional investor category. As a result, I can't help wondering if the weekly sentiment survey is no longer a truly contrarian indicator. The blend novice/smart investors responding might explain why the system seems to be having difficulty giving clear signals. Just a thought.
 
I thought about that, but I still consider myself the dumb money so if anyone is following my analysis... :)

I think we got a good outcome last week with the 0.98 to 1 ratio, just not quite enough however, to put the signal into sell mode and avoid the losses. Perhaps it is as you said, because many more of us are contrarians and understand the concept makes people answer differentlt than they may have a year ago.

But I've noticed that something simple like what happens to the market on the day of the survey seems affects it greatly as well.

I am not too concerned yet. The system is hanging in there with the market at least (not doing worse) and the system has had bad years before and it could be cyclical. Let's see how the rest of the year goes.

By the way, thanks for the kind words and for being a loyal reader of TSP Talk!
 
Happy Trails;bt4062 said:
Does anyone believe this is the start of another bull run?
I would have preferred to see today get ugly first so instead, I think this is another bear market rally. Resistance is just overhead and the open gap on the Nasdaq is getting close to being filled, so I think we will find out soon enough (maybe Tuesday) if this rally is more than that.
 
Troy1967;bt4065 said:
I've been following tsptalk for a number of years. Tom does a such a great job with his daily commentaries educating all his subscribers that many may no longer fall into the novice/non-professional investor category. As a result, I can't help wondering if the weekly sentiment survey is no longer a truly contrarian indicator. The blend novice/smart investors responding might explain why the system seems to be having difficulty giving clear signals. Just a thought.

The people who take the survey are semi random. There are people that regularly log in just to take the survey. Others that try to if they aren't busy, and some that take it randomly. With that in mind, the outcome should be fairly reliable. IF it was always the same people taking the survey then I think maybe the number may skew over time.

I would be more interested in volume of pollsters and if having less pollsters makes for more inaccurate poll results compared to actual market movement.

Emo
 
Back
Top