L Income

[dieselscout80]

Well I don't understand how it could have stayed the same today.
L Income 13.31 on 12 July 07 and stayed at 13.31 on 13 July 07.

L Income:
G - (74%) which paid a penny 12.01 to 12.02 +1
F - (6%) went from 11.23 to 11.24 +1
C - (12%) went from 17.29 to 17.34 +5
S - (3%) went from 21.15 to 21.21 +6
I - (5%) down 5 cents 25.48 to 25.43 -5

So how does that equal no change from 13.31???????? :suspicious:

 

[saturneptune]

Well I don't understand how it could have stayed the same today.
L Income 13.31 on 12 July 07 and stayed at 13.31 on 13 July 07.

L Income:
G - (74%) which paid a penny 12.01 to 12.02 +1
F - (6%) went from 11.23 to 11.24 +1
C - (12%) went from 17.29 to 17.34 +5
S - (3%) went from 21.15 to 21.21 +6
I - (5%) down 5 cents 25.48 to 25.43 -5

So how does that equal no change from 13.31???????? :suspicious:

The opposite question could be asked today, July 16th. How can all of the funds go down except the G fund stays the same and the L income remain even? If you choose the L fund, the allocation is automatic per their formulas.

 

[James48843]

Reminds me of "story problems" back in 5th grade.

"If a train leaves Cleveland, headed west, at 65 mph, and a train leaves Chicago headed east, at 42 miles an hour, how far will the Cleveland train travel before crashing head on into the Chicago train. Show your work.".

Ahh... those were the days.

Back to the problem- you raise a good question.

80% went up a penny.
12% went up a nickle.
3% went up six cents.
And only 5% went down a nickle.

Hmmmmmm.......