-
The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com
-
Please read our AutoTracker policy on the IFT deadline and remaining active. Thanks!
div>
$ - Premium Service Content (Info) | AutoTracker Monthly Winners | Is Gmail et al, Blocking Our emails?
Find us on: Facebook & X | Posting Copyrighted Material
Join the TSP Talk AutoTracker: How to Get Started | Login | Main AutoTracker Page
The Forum works well on MOBILE devices without an app: Just go to: https://forum.tsptalk.com ...
Or you can now use TapaTalk again!IRS seeks to levy TSP accounts of tax-delinquent feds
- Thread starter tsptalk
- Start date
Frixxxx
Moderator
Mr Losey,
Of the 276,000 people, on average thats $10,800/pp. I would like to know three things:
1. How many of these people are in negotiations to pay the IRS?
2. Why the IRS hasn't garnished retirees payouts?
3. Have the current employee defaulters been removed from classified work areas?
It is trivial to go after their TSP. I would venture to guess the majority of people don't have accounts or have minimal account balances.
Also, 97K is less than 5% of employees. This seems like SWEEPing change to punish the many, instead of the few.
Silverbird
Well-known member
That's kind of silly - Isn't the IRS free to garnish wages on unpaid taxes? So why not just do that? Or are they trying to catch one term Congressmen?
On the little details?
So...does this work like a loan that you have to repay to your own retirement?
I assume the money's subject to tax, since it's only tax-deffered.
Does this extend to other retirement 401ks besides that of the Federal Government, or are we being singled out (is that discrimination)?
Frixxxx
Moderator
Right, Can they force you to withdrawal, take a tax hit, to pay taxes?
Can't wrap my head around it!:suspicious:Frixxxx, Can't currently "make" you but they can apply enough pressure that you'll be happy to get the money out of the TSP or anywhere else it is stashed just to get them off your back. Realistically, if you have enough money left in the TSP it probably makes sense to take it from there as a loan since penalties and interest really add up on tax debt and the TSP loan has a low rate and you're paying yourself back. Change to allow levies against TSP funds is almost a moot point since anyone in Tax trouble probably has other debt and has already cleaned out the TSP kitty. More of a statement than an effective collection tool.
Frixxxx
Moderator
Scout, I think Silverbird has it.....They should just garnish wages. That is how they do it in the real world....why get creative with fed employees?:suspicious:
Frixxxx
Moderator
Scary part is they walk amongst us.....:blink:Good point Frixxxx, if employed that would likely be one of the first things they would go for. One of the pressure items I was talking about. Doesn't leave much for food and medicine.
Could also affect retirees or others no longer currently working.
Contact EAP, get out of trouble......negotiate and pay.
Retirees, I don't know how to fix them.
James48843
Well-known member
I've worked for the govt for 20 years, and been a Union rep for 10 of those years. I am aware of perhaps a half-a dozen employees who got into tax trouble over all that time.
In every case, it was somebody who had a major unexpected expense- like the guy who's sister had cancer and was out of money, and the brother cleaned out most of his TSP account to help her, and then the following year had a huge tax payment that he couldn't make. The hospital got it's 150K from the poor guy, but he ends up with the 40K tax bill the next year, and tries to make arrangements with the IRS, but he's technically on the list of those considered a tax delinquent. So they go after him with everything they can, and he tries to keep his job and still make all the payments.
Seen it many times.
Sure, a law allowing the IRS to get the person's remaining TSP dollars would collect some of that back- but it isn't going to change the fact that a certain percentage of people will show up as being a tax delinquent. Sometimes it just happens.
James48843
Well-known member
Sometimes I would say yes- or not taken out their TSP or 401(k) to cover something. But they do. The last one I had was a guy who lost his wife to cancer and incurred the debt in conjunction with that. When that kind of thing is going on, you don't always think straight.
Unfortunately, the first time I hear about such cases is usually the day they come in to do the disciplinary hearing for "failing to pay debts", which the penalty can be removal. Yes, they should have sought professional advice from a lawyer before incurring huge tax liabilities- but they don't. And they try and hold off things, only to pop up on the Agency's radar when they have a late payment on something- like their government credit card, which then triggers a credit report, which then uncovers the IRS debt, which then leads to double discipline charges- late on the credit card, and then failure to pay debts. Double whammy, a hearing, and then wham- they fire the person. Bad news all around.
My best advice to anyone is talk to a professional the minute something big comes along they haven't dealt with before- so they aren't getting themselves in a whole lot more than they bargained for.
Silverbird
Well-known member
All I have are those questions below. I'm [temporarily] in a cube so if I use the phone I may as well put my conversation on the PA system.
FYI, Union Pres. Colleen Kelley for NTEU spoke before Congress on this issue-
"Federal Employee/Retiree Delinquency Initiative (FERDI)
In 1993, IRS initiated the Federal Employee/Retiree Delinquency Initiative (FERDI), to promote
federal tax compliance among current and retired federal employees. According to the Internal
Revenue Manual, the program incorporates the purpose and intent of Office of Government
Ethics regulations 5 CFR 2635.809, discussed previously.
The broad objectives of FERDI are to enhance the federal government’s tax administration
process by improving the compliance of federal employees and annuitants with their
responsibility for filing tax returns and paying taxes, thereby helping to ensure the public’s
confidence in the tax system. The program combines reaching out to federal agencies to raise
their awareness of this issue and prioritizing IRS’ efforts to reduce its unpaid tax cases.
Beginning in 1993, the IRS began periodically matching its records of outstanding taxes and
non-filed tax returns against federal personnel records to identify federal workers and annuitants
who either had outstanding taxes or had not filed their tax returns. IRS entered into agreements
with the Defense Manpower Data Center, which receives personnel data files on many of the
government’s active and retired civilian and military workers, and the U.S. Postal Service, which
maintains and processes similar data for postal workers" Additional law not needed!
Boghie
Well-known member
The IRS should treat all taxpayers the same - thus, if they cannot levy 401(k) accounts (and equivalents) they should not be able to levy TSP accounts. A TSP account is a 401(k) account.
Mr. Losey,
The IRS already has FULL records of our income - that is not 100% certain in private industry.
The Treasury can 'borrow' from our most conservative cash equivalent fund held in our 401(k). Can the Treasury 'borrow' assets from your 401(k) money market?
And, more pertinent to your article, perhaps some - many - of these taxpayers have a legitimate conflict with what the IRS says is due. Guess what, the IRS is not always correct!
Finally, if the IRS gets this power it will have the equivalent for all retirement accounts.
jayhawker
Member
They take 10% Federal; no State. That's the 10% penalty for early withdrawal. However, if the IRS applies a levy to your account to collect taxes owed, you DO NOT pay the 10% penalty. It's an exception (#10 I believe.)
They say they will only levy retirement accounts as a last resort in an attempt to collect back taxes.
J
nnuut
Moderator | TSP Legend
I wasn't referring to a penalty, I paid no penalty only FEDERAL TAX at 20%, but I did get some of that back at the end of the year when I filed taxes. I was CSRS and had to be 59 1/2 to qualify for the one time partial withdrawal. Now I can only withdraw all, no more partial withdrawal, but can take some out on a monthly basis.Similar threads
