Global Warming Link to Drowned Polar Bears BUSTED!!

Annual Weather Summary: November 2011 to October 2012


Winter will be colder than normal, especially in February. Other cold periods will occur in mid- and late December and mid- and late January. Precipitation and snowfall will be below normal in the east and above normal in the west. The snowiest periods will be in early and mid-December, early to mid-February, and mid-March.​
April and May will be much cooler and a bit drier than normal.
Summer will be cooler and drier than normal. The hottest periods will occur in mid-July and early August. September and October will be cooler and drier than normal in most of the region.
http://www.almanac.com/weather/longrange/region/us/9


Heavy snow, brutally cold temperatures predicted for Midwest

According to AccuWeather.com's forecast, it looks like the Midwest will be dealt with the worst weather this winter. Bitterly cold blasts of arctic air are expected to invade the northern Plains, Midwest and Great Lakes December through January, while snowfall averages above normal.
While the coldest temperatures are forecast for Minnesota and Chicago might have the heaviest snowfalls, snowfall totals in Ohio are predicted to be above normal with plenty of heavy lake-effect storm events.

To add to the area's misery, the heavy snowfalls are expected to linger, stretching colder-than-normal weather into early spring.
http://www.cleveland.com/weather/blog/index.ssf/2011/10/heavy_snow_brutally_cold_tempe.html


Winter forecast: Brutal cold, snow for Midwest

Another punishing winter is likely for the north-central USA, according to a forecast released today by the private weather forecasting firm AccuWeather.
While the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic shouldn't see a winter as severe as last year, bitterly cold blasts of arctic air are expected in the northern Plains, Midwest and Great Lakes in December and January, with above-average snowfall, according to AccuWeather long-range meteorologist Paul Pastelok.
Chicago, which endured several blizzards last winter, could be one of the hardest-hit U.S. cities in terms of both snow and cold, he says.
In the South, there is little hope for Texas to escape its epic drought this winter, as below-average precipitation is predicted for most of the state.
However, severe weather and flooding rains could again batter the lower Mississippi Valley and Southeast in February, AccuWeather forecasts.
The main climate factor this winter is La Nina, a phenomenon that occurs when sea-surface temperatures across the equatorial central and eastern Pacific Ocean are below normal. La Ninas often produce a volatile weather pattern for the Midwest and Northeast during the winter but also tend to produce drier-than-average conditions across the southern tier of the USA.
http://content.usatoday.com/communi...ediction-forecast-harsh-midwest-accuweather/1
 
Annual Weather Summary: November 2011 to October 2012


Winter will be colder than normal, especially in February. Other cold periods will occur in mid- and late December and mid- and late January. Precipitation and snowfall will be below normal in the east and above normal in the west. The snowiest periods will be in early and mid-December, early to mid-February, and mid-March.​

April and May will be much cooler and a bit drier than normal.
Summer will be cooler and drier than normal. The hottest periods will occur in mid-July and early August. September and October will be cooler and drier than normal in most of the region.
http://www.almanac.com/weather/longrange/region/us/9

I really like how you tap that highly scientifically accurate "Old Farmer's Almanac" there Buster. Shows you have some great data to back you up.

almanac.jpg
 
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/j...obal-warming-loons-here-comes-climategate-ii/


And as before, they show the "scientists" at the heart of the Man-Made Global Warming industry in a most unflattering light. Michael Mann, Phil Jones, Ben Santer, Tom Wigley, Kevin Trenberth, Keith Briffa – all your favourite Climategate characters are here, once again caught red-handed in a series of emails exaggerating the extent of Anthropogenic Global Warming, while privately admitting to one another that the evidence is nowhere near as a strong as they'd like it to be.

In other words, what these emails confirm is that the great man-made global warming scare is not about science but about political activism.

If you're going to bomb the global economy back to the dark ages with environmental tax and regulation, if you're going to favour costly, landscape-blighting, inefficient renewables over real, abundant, relatively cheap energy that works like shale gas and oil, if you're going to cause food riots and starvation in the developing world by giving over farmland (and rainforests) to biofuel production, then at the very least you it owe to the world to base your policies on sound, transparent, evidence-based science rather than on the politicised, disingenuous junk churned out by the charlatans at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
 
Yeah, but what's causing it? That is the question and I don't want to see any IPCC charts.
 
Prove it, show me the holes, make me a believer. I don't want to see the Hockey Stick, or any other drummed up information.:cheesy:
 
Let me get this straight. "most of the warming is with the overnight low temperatures." Clouds are the biggest contributer to GW. When was it clear and when/where was it cloudy? Yes clear nights/days can be colder, so we have mainly cloudy or the CO2 is holding in the heat and causing the warming, which is it. I read an article that CO2 doesn't contribute to warming to the extent that was thought and they proved it. I'm watching Conan the Barbarian right now and have to get back I will post it later.:laugh:
 
But it DID cause some...
Nah, it's cloud cover and atmospheric pressure, think of Venus completely covered with cloud cover and the atmospheric pressure is much greater than earth's. Without such an increase in pressure it just can't happen here. The oceans ability of storing and releasing CO2 into the atmosphere regulates the .11% of the atmosphere that is CO2, man made CO2 is only 3% of that .11% the rest is NATURE! Water dissolves CO2, yes even rain and humidity does. Too complicated for me.:cool:
 
Then there is this::nuts:
11/29/2011 @ 4:59PM |2,984 views
Climategate II: More Smoking Guns From The Global Warming Establishment

A new release of incriminating e-mail exchanges between leading climate scientists that is now being termed “Climategate II” actually represents but another episode in a continuing scandal that has been taking place for decades. This fraud of massive scope and consequence has served as the basis for arguably the greatest regulatory overreach of all time.
It has been used to justify the EPA’s demands that restrict carbon dioxide and other “greenhouse gas” emissions from stationary sources they attribute to causing climate change. Included are electrical power generation facilities, iron and steel mills, pulp and paper mills, cement production, and the construction industry.
The EPA’s “Endangerment Finding”applied to support these actions was based upon politically-manipulated human-caused climate warming conclusions issued by the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that were even at odds with findings of its own internal study on the matter. That EPA report stated “given the downward trend in temperatures since 1998 (which some think will continue until at least 2030), there is no particular reason to rush into decisions based upon a scientific hypothesis that does not appear to explain most of the available data.”
http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybe...g-guns-from-the-global-warming-establishment/
 
Generalizations are the easy way out.
I think we've been through all this before and are in a stalemate.
 
I have a solution! If we can get FWM and nnuut to agree on something, Hell will freeze over and maybe it will take care of global warming. :laugh:
 
"I have a solution! If we can get FWM and nnuut to agree on something, Hell will freeze over and maybe it will take care of global warming.
laugh.gif
"

GOOD IDEA! I think you have a valid point. Although you have to realize that I respect my friends FWM's opinion because he is a professional and has much more education and experience than I do about the subject. What I post is what I think is the obvious truth an my mind is made up, UNLESS you can show me the holes. I think more CO2 is expelled from carbonated soft drinks, champagne, and animal flatulence than from VOLCANOES, Opps I meant to say autos. CO2 is not our problem it's stupidity!
 
NASA, on global warming historic, scientific fact:

Fig.A.jpg

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/

Data is data. Can't argue with that.

Now, whether or not the CO2 level is increasing because of carbonated beverages, or champagne, I do not know.

sexy-rosalie-in-giant-champagne-glass2.jpg

I know both of those are man-made.
 
Back
Top