Doubt Creeping In

For six straight weeks the Top 50 has maintained a total stock allocation above 91% (and five of those weeks it was over 96%). This week, some of those TSPers are getting more defensive.

Fund Allocation ~ Top 50 Chart 3.jpg
2012 Top 50 Trend.jpg

Total Stock allocations fell 11.94% for this group this week to a total stock allocation of 84.06%. Last year, a drop in the stock allocation of more than 10% usually resulted in higher prices the following week. In fact, the Top 50 was wrong 77% of the time last year when they got this defensive in a bull market. I'm thinking we've got at least some upside action next week and given March 1st is next Friday (when sequestration kicks in) we certainly could see a big move. If it's to the upside, we may be in for lower prices earlier in the week first. But I'm just speculating here. The main thing to keep in mind is that we have a catalyst next week that can have a big influence on the stock market regardless.

Total Tracker Fund Allocation.jpg
2012 Total Tracker Trend.jpg

The Total Tracker saw stock allocations drop 7.83% to a total stock allocation of just 42.11% (again, in a bull market). That's fairly defensive.

2-24-2013 09-46-03 AM.png

The S&P 500 saw that shorter term trend line violated last week. The intermediate term trend line is further below. RSI fell last week, but still remains positive. MACD is struggling around the flat line, but has been biased lower.

Our sentiment survey was pretty bearish with 29% bulls vs 63% bears. I'd have to think we're looking higher this week with a reading like this. Not to mention the drop in stock allocations by the Top 50. My thought is that the big money may seek to reload earlier in the week before sending the market higher in the latter part of the week. But that's just a guess. Technically, this market is hurting and does appear poised to fall further. But that's obvious to most technicians. It may not be that easy. Volatility is picking up too and I think that may remain the case for a little while yet. It's a higher risk play, but I'm thinking the dips should be bought in the short term. But volatility will not make that easy for those of us in the TSP. Longer term, I'm looking lower.
 
interesting analysis. Attempting to learn from tollowing the traceker was valuable last year, as i didnt really pay much attention until the last half of the year (didnt joing until then). But this year, the tracker ranking hasnt been as meaningful. The top leaders have mostly been just those who held the S fund. The S fund is, afterall, 10th on the tracker now. It might be more meaningful, or at least interesting, to track what the positions are for people today, based on their ranking last year, since their ranking this year is based on limited data. of course this assumes that the system used last year still has merit in today's climate.

I watch the top dozen from last year, they are doing well this year, but its not a repeat.
 
maverick06;bt6163 said:
interesting analysis. Attempting to learn from tollowing the traceker was valuable last year, as i didnt really pay much attention until the last half of the year (didnt joing until then). But this year, the tracker ranking hasnt been as meaningful. The top leaders have mostly been just those who held the S fund. The S fund is, afterall, 10th on the tracker now. It might be more meaningful, or at least interesting, to track what the positions are for people today, based on their ranking last year, since their ranking this year is based on limited data. of course this assumes that the system used last year still has merit in today's climate.

I watch the top dozen from last year, they are doing well this year, but its not a repeat.

Our tracker is reset every January, which makes reading the allocations more tricky until things setttle out (perhaps 2-3 months). On a week to week basis, there isn't always a clear signal just based on the Top 50's allocations. Often, it's largely neutral. And you are correct that the results obtained from watching the Top 50 last year may not be the same this year. But it is a type of sentiment indicator and should perform well over the long haul. It's not a stand-alone indicator though, and should be used in conjuction with other indicators. I try to keep the market in context using multiple data points this way.
 
maverick06;bt6163 said:
interesting analysis. Attempting to learn from tollowing the traceker was valuable last year, as i didnt really pay much attention until the last half of the year (didnt joing until then). But this year, the tracker ranking hasnt been as meaningful. The top leaders have mostly been just those who held the S fund. The S fund is, afterall, 10th on the tracker now. It might be more meaningful, or at least interesting, to track what the positions are for people today, based on their ranking last year, since their ranking this year is based on limited data. of course this assumes that the system used last year still has merit in today's climate.

I watch the top dozen from last year, they are doing well this year, but its not a repeat.

I forgot to mention one more thing. When I first started compiling this data several years ago, I isolated the top 15 TSPers based on 3 years worth of data. I tracked those 15 for awhile, but after about a year or so I took note that those 15 were scattered up and down the tracker, which rendered it relatively meaningless in my eyes. What it did tell me was that staying on top consistently, year after year, is darn hard to do. Of those 15 folks tracked, Intrepid Timer was one of them. He was the most consistent of the bunch. Of course, he now has a premium service.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top