Cramer's meltdown

IMO, what he really wants is for the Fed to lower rates so that the variable loan rates will go down and his hedge fund buddies that screwed up can tread water for a while. Then when the Fed does lower rates and the markets really tank they can shift some of the blame on the Fed.

I would not what to be Ben.
 
He was on The Cobert Report last week. That's where I get all my business news....ha!

Anyway, he was saying that he was just trying to protect the folks that were losing their homes. :suspicious:
 
Yeah he's such a humanitarian - he's worried about the 7 million people that were getting ripped off and may end up squatting in their homes AS OPPOSED to the 3 milllion that were projected on the risk analysis :suspicious:
 
During his meltdown, Cramer said, "Open the discount window." Well, I guess he got his wish.
 
Another Cramer moment yesterday morning. Here he is celebrating the rate cut yesterday. Some of his quotes:
We will be up most we have ever been in history today.
If they hadn't done this, we would probably be down 1,000 points today. The odds for a crash today and Monday would have been the highest its been since 1987.
Many of my friends are set up completely wrong for today. I have many short people who all just literally thought this was going to be a very down day. People caught in the wrong direction. It's a brilliant move by the Fed.
I hated them two weeks ago. I love them today.

Here's the vid:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7-qL3ylQfU
 
If Jim wants to earn brownie points, he should compare the sub-prime lending industry to the telemarketing industry and explain how the world would be better off without either of them. :)
 
Shorting Cramer
By BILL ALPERT

THANKS TO HIS NIGHTLY CNBC SHOW Mad Money, Jim Cramer has become the chief cheerleader for the bull market, or what was the bull market until a few weeks ago. Last spring, he was giddily exhorting the Dow Jones Industrial Average toward 15,000, with no troubles in sight. Earlier this month, as the Dow tumbled in the direction of 13,000, he had an on-air meltdown, complete with screaming, sobs and predictions of financial doom. The clip quickly made the rounds on YouTube. Friday, after the Fed cut the discount rate, he said that the Dow's run to 14,500 had begun. With dramatic pronouncements like that, it's no wonder that more than 100,000 viewers tune in each weeknight for his antic mashup of sound effects, Streetwise advice and stock picks.

It's those stock picks that caught our attention. Cramer, by all accounts, had a stellar career as a hedge-fund manager. And he is held out by CNBC as the guy who can help viewers make big money. But a comprehensive and careful review of his stock picks by Barron's finds that his picks haven't beaten the market. Over the past two years, viewers holding Cramer's stocks would be up 12% while the Dow rose 22% and the S&P 500 16%, according to a record of 1,300 of the CNBC star's Buy recommendations compiled by YourMoneyWatch.com, a Website run by a retired stock analyst and loyal Cramer-watcher.

We also looked at a database of Cramer's Mad Money picks maintained by his Website, TheStreet.com. It covers only the past six months, but includes an astounding 3,458 stocks -- Buys mainly, punctuated by some Sells. These picks were flat to down in relation to the market. Count commissions and you would have been much better off in an index fund that simply tracks the market.

http://online.barrons.com/article/SB118681265755995100.html?mod=mktw
 
This is typical Cramer...

On July 26, 2005, Cramer interviewed Aleks Cukic, Intuitive Surgical's vice president of business development and strategic planning, on the show. The company had just announced blowout earnings, and Cramer was convinced. "Intuitive Surgical is a winner," Cramer said. The stock went on to open at $63.16 the next day. Two days after issuing the buy, Cramer had senior MarketWatch columnist Herb Greenberg on the show. Greenberg was cautious, picking out risks in owning Intuitive Surgical, and Cramer agreed. According to the recap, "Cramer said it would be silly for investors who have big gains to not ring the register after such a big move in the stock." The next day the stock opened at $69.21.
A 9.6% gain in two days is nothing to scoff at. The problem is that if that trade was done in a taxable account, triggering short term capital gains would have cut into more than a third of those returns.
Cramer regained his bullish tone on Sept. 6. "I think the great quarters are going to continue," he told the caller. The stock opened the next day at $69.38. Yes, you have to give Cramer props in that the company didn't do much while he was away, though buying in a few pennies higher than after his July warning also came with the extra costs of two broker trades to step out and step back in.
The September call was a juicy one. Two months later, he issued a colorful kiss-off. "You should ring the register," he said on Nov. 9. "Didn't you ever take that astronomy course that tells you how high you are?" The stock opened at $95.70 the next day, so one would think that a 38% gain in two months wouldn't leave too many investors smarting.
However, just five days later, with the stock in triple digits, he grabbed the company by its bullish horns. He once again had Cukic on the show, and it's amazing what three trading days can do for one's disposition.
"You don't get in the way of these monsters when they're rolling," he said on Nov. 14. "This stock goes higher because they're nowhere near saturation. I think it's still two thumbs up for ISRG."
The stock opened at $105.50, angering the astronomy students who had taken his advice a few days earlier and bailed in the double digits.
On Dec. 13, pointing out that the stock had tripled since the beginning of the year, Cramer remained bullish. "You're in the House of Pleasure," he said. "Ride that stock another 10 points." The stock opened at $118.89 after the show.
Did he wait for those 10 points? No way. "I now want to ring the register," he said on Jan. 5, 2006, lumping the company together with Syneron Medical on his sell call. "I think ISRG has overstayed its welcome on the 52-week-high list." The stock opened the next day at $117.73. It wasn't necessarily a fair comparison, because Syneron had just warned that it would miss its 2005 revenue target.




CNBC addicts who followed Cramer's advice on Intuitive Surgical every step of the way over the last six months may feel richly rewarded. Despite the trading costs, missed gaps, taxable short-term gains and tax-filing hassles, they would have come out ahead. The three round-trip trades would have resulted in a 59% overall gain, reduced to a still respectable sub-40% after the taxman's cut. That's without accounting for the various charges involved due to weaving in and out of the shares. One can't dismiss those nibbles. It could be substantial, especially for smaller investors. Still, it seems like a pretty enriching string of trades on the surface.
However, that's no match for buying in at the mid-$40s 10 months ago -- or close to $70 just four months ago -- and riding it up to the triple digits the easy way.
Buy and hold may be a boring mantra, but it works even for volatile growth stocks.
http://www.fool.com/investing/high-growth/2006/01/09/cramer-vs-cramer.aspx

Cramer trashes buy and hold but in reality, buy and hold trashes Cramer!
 
How does Cramer go from, "Lower interest rates!!" to cheering Ron Paul, who is against the lowering of interest rates???
:confused:

Tonight's Cramer's Mad Money interview with Ron Paul:

 
If you we put the over night lending rate in the hands of the free-market, short term high yield investments would drive the rates down. We would get massive inflation and reinstitute the Fed or some other agency to limit the money supply in order to control inflation.

Ask anyone in Brazil that lived through the days when they got paid twice a day because of inflation.

The Fed is a necessity - someone has to control inflation, no business is going to sacrifice short term profits for the sake of the system, while their competitors reap the rewards regardless of the consequences.

If inflation is 3% as opposed to 2%, that will depleat the Social Security fund about 10 years ahead of schedule.
 
Back
Top