Al Gore wins Nobel Peace Prize

[DrFaustus]

This guy knows what's happening!!!
“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense…The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.” - Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles. http://epw.senate.gov/public/index....ecord_id=2158072e-802a-23ad-45f0-274616db87e6

Essentially the point of Michael Crichton's book "State of Fear."

 

[CountryBoy]

Algore is just running a big con game. Hostroy shows these warming and cooling periods. I was old enough to remember this same group of "scientist" calling for the next ice age in the 70's. It's noting but a big scambola.

CB

 

[Buster]

Say what you want about Algore (Rush Limbaugh, 1992), But he invented the Internet, you know

 

[nnuut]

say what you want about algore (rush limbaugh, 1992:d), but he invented the internet, you know

 

[budnipper1]

View attachment 5231
President-elect Barack Obama has selected his top energy and environmental advisers, including a Nobel Prize-winning physicist and the former head of the Environmental Protection Agency, presidential transition officials said Wednesday.

Collectively, they will have the task of carrying out Mr. Obama’s stated intent to curb global warming emissions drastically while fashioning a more efficient national energy system. And they will be able to work with strong allies in Congress who are interested in developing climate-change legislation, despite fierce economic headwinds that will amplify objections from manufacturers and energy producers.

The officials said Mr. Obama would name Steven Chu, the director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, as his energy secretary, and Nancy Sutley, deputy mayor of Los Angeles for energy and environment, as head of the White House Council on Environmental Quality. Mr. Obama also appears ready to name Carol M. Browner, the E.P.A. administrator under President Bill Clinton, as the top White House official on climate and energy policy and Lisa P. Jackson, who until recently was New Jersey’s commissioner of environmental protection, as the head of the E.P.A.

If named to the White House climate post, Ms. Browner, an *acolyte of former Vice President Al Gore, will have forceful support in the new Congress, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Representative Henry A. Waxman of California, who will be the new chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and Senator Barbara Boxer of California, who is returning as chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. Opposing their efforts will be many Republicans and some Democrats, as well as manufacturers, utilities, oil companies and coal producers who will bear the brunt of the costs of any steps to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, the main culprit in global warming. (Bull$hit!)
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/11/us/politics/11appoint.html?th&emc=th

*Acolyte can mean any of the following:
Acolyte - a rank in the clergy.
Acolyte - any devoted follower or attendant.
Acolyte, Inc. - an Indonesian manga publisher.
Acolyte Protection Agency - a wrestling (WWE) tag team.
Acolytes (comics) - a Marvel Comics team of mutant supervillains
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acolyte_(disambiguation
​

 

[budnipper1]

More hot air from algore...

View attachment 5550
http://www.newschannel5.com/global/story.asp?s=9746699&ClientType=Printable

​

 

[Viva_La_Migra]

View attachment 5231
Collectively, they will have the task of carrying out Mr. Obama’s stated intent to curb global warming emissions drastically while fashioning a more efficient national energy system. And they will be able to work with strong allies in Congress who are interested in developing climate-change legislation, despite fierce economic headwinds that will amplify objections from manufacturers and energy producers.

The officials said Mr. Obama would name Steven Chu, the director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, as his energy secretary, and Nancy Sutley, deputy mayor of Los Angeles for energy and environment, as head of the White House Council on Environmental Quality. Mr. Obama also appears ready to name Carol M. Browner, the E.P.A. administrator under President Bill Clinton, as the top White House official on climate and energy policy and Lisa P. Jackson, who until recently was New Jersey’s commissioner of environmental protection, as the head of the E.P.A.

If named to the White House climate post, Ms. Browner, an *acolyte of former Vice President Al Gore, will have forceful support in the new Congress, including Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Representative Henry A. Waxman of California, who will be the new chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, and Senator Barbara Boxer of California, who is returning as chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. Opposing their efforts will be many Republicans and some Democrats, as well as manufacturers, utilities, oil companies and coal producers who will bear the brunt of the costs of any steps to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, the main culprit in global warming. (Bull$hit!)
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/11/us/politics/11appoint.html?th&emc=th
​

We are headed for a liberal civil war, folks. It's Algore and the religion of environmentalism versus People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals! Carbon footprints and gaseous bovines! The creator of the Internet meets the Baywatch Beauty! Will cows be allowed to continue to pollute the planet with their noxious emissions? Will breast implants be declared environmental waste? Will Algore buy more carbon credits so he can blow more hot air? Stay tuned and find out!

 

[budnipper1]

We are headed for a liberal civil war, folks. It's Algore and the religion of environmentalism versus People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals! Carbon footprints and gaseous bovines! The creator of the Internet meets the Baywatch Beauty! Will cows be allowed to continue to pollute the planet with their noxious emissions? Will breast implants be declared environmental waste? Will Algore buy more carbon credits so he can blow more hot air? Stay tuned and find out!

AMEN. :notrust:
​

View attachment 5552

 

[KevinD]

By John Coleman

The key players are now all in place in Washington and in state governments across America to officially label carbon dioxide as a pollutant and enact laws that tax we citizens for our carbon footprints.

Only two details stand in the way, the faltering economic times and a dramatic turn toward a colder climate. The last two bitter winters have led tthe public to be skeptical that any runaway global warning. There is now awareness that there may be reason to question whether CO2 is a pollutant and a significant greenhouse gas.

How did we ever get to this point where bad science is driving big government? And how will we ever stop it?

The story begins with an Oceanographer named Roger Revelle. He served with the Navy in World War II. After the war he became the Director of the Scripps Oceanographic Institute in La Jolla in San Diego, California. Revelle saw the opportunity to obtain major funding from the Navy for doing measurements and research on the ocean around the Pacific Atolls where the US military was conducting atomic bomb tests. He greatly expanded the Institute's areas of interest and among others hired Hans Suess, a noted Chemist from the University of Chicago, who was very interested in the traces of carbon in the environment from the burning of fossil fuels. Revelle tagged on to Suess studies and co-authored a paper with him in 1957. The paper raises the possibility that the carbon dioxide might be creating a greenhouse effect and causing atmospheric warming. It seems to be a plea for funding for more studies. Funding, frankly, is where Revelle's mind was most of the time.

Next Revelle hired a Geochemist named David Keeling to devise a way to measure the atmospheric content of Carbon dioxide. In 1960 Keeling published his first paper showing the increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and linking the increase to the burning of fossil fuels.

These two research papers became the bedrock of the science of global warming, even though they offered no proof that carbon dioxide was in fact a greenhouse gas. In addition they failed to explain how this trace gas, only a tiny fraction of the atmosphere, could have any significant impact on temperatures.

http://www.kusi.com/weather/colemanscorner/38574742.html

...

 

[budnipper1]

... http://www.kusi.com/weather/colemans.../38574742.html

Another good reference to the Global Warming Scam. Thanks KevinD.

From your link, I found Coleman's official statement to the 2008
International Conference of Climate Change, a 12 page report.
http://media.kusi.com/documents/REMARKS+OF+JOHN+COLEMAN+FINAL6c.pdf

I'll never understand why so many have bought this bogus
junk science, hook, line and sinker. If they would only stop
and try thinking it through for themselves, it would become
obvious that mankind's effect on climate change has been
insignificant. The slight variations, both ups and downs, of the
earth's average temperatures are natural climatic cycles.

This has been happening for thousands of years, long before cars
or factories existed. It is nature... it is the "weather"!
We can't change it. We can't control it.
We can merely live with it! We are but a speck in the universe.
http://environmentalchemistry.com/yogi/environmental/200611CO2globalwarming.html
​

 

[Thunderhorse]

Bored and frozen in FL.

Anyone remember the Global Cooling Panic in the early 1970's?

Weather and stock markets. I wonder if anyone has researched possible correlations between the two.

Where's my acorn?



View attachment 5662

signed,
the saber toothed squirrel

 

[Viva_La_Migra]

Where's my acorn?

ACORN is in Washington, DC getting it's payback for helping the administration get elected!

 

[budnipper1]

Global Warming: Gone, but we will be taxed anyway
March 23

Global Warming just isn’t happening anymore. The warming trend stopped in 2000, but that hasn’t stopped Al Gore and the 52 Scientists from the IPCC (United Nations) to continue to alarm the public. In 2009 we heard Al Gore reverse his claim of global warming to a message of “climate change.”

There has been a history of his type of terrorism, on the very first “Earth Day,” April 22, 1970; Senator Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin claimed that the world was cooling. After a period of time it was found that we were actually warming, now that the trend has reversed the global warming alarmists argument no longer holds water.

The war cry of Al Gores group said that CO2 was tied hand in hand with warming. CO2 now continues to rise even though there is a trend for cooling. Many items from Al Gore’s film “An Inconvenient Truth” have been discredited, and yet the policies continue as if everything he said was the gospel truth. The main point of the film had to do with the “hockey stick theory,” which was later found out to eliminate crucial data to bolster Mann’s study. Once the main theory was discredited as well as biased computer models, the credibility should have gone down the drain, but as of today it hasn’t.

President Obama supports Al Gore’s scientifically lacking theories, even though 31,000 scientists now refute all the findings of the 52 member politically driven IPCC reports. Because of the teaching nature of most scientists, they were silent for a long time; for fear of losing their government or collegiate funding, if they spoke what they felt was the truth. Increasing anger among the scientific community has caused them to now go on record to expose the truth about a political answer to scientific question.

Science has never been a closed door as Gore referred to as a “consensus.” Science is always evolving, and as new research methods come to light, as well as data (as is now), theories can change. To refuse this goes in the face of all scientific endeavors.

I have detailed an article about Al Gore, his accomplices, and the trouble with his movie.

This wouldn’t be a problem if it was merely a talking point, but it is not. This alarming terrorist plot has grown legs as yet another tax disguised as an issue. The cap and trade is just another tax to corporations to pass along to end users.

We need to let our representatives know how we feel, more taxes are not what we need now in our time of economic need. Especially on hair-brained, half baked, half wrong theories.

http://www.examiner.com/x-3678-Balt...obal-Warming-Gone-but-we-will-be-taxed-anyway

31,478 scientists who disagree with Gore
http://www.petitionproject.org/signers_by_last_name.php

Al Gore quote:
“If something never happened before, we’re usually safe in assuming it’s not gonna happen in the future,” he said. “Usually, that rule works, but it’s the exceptions that can kill you. This is one of the exceptions.”
http://www.timesnews.net/article.php?id=9012740
Gore implores ETSU audience to help battle global warming
March 26th, 2009

http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/johncoleman.asp

 

[PessOptimist]

Whenever I have a minor disagreement with either of my left of me children, I tell them "it's an inconvenient truth". They roll their eyes but also are intelligent enough to know bs when they see it.

As it turns out, ol right wing dad is more green than they are.

So, chill out, Gore is just another huckster looking to scare people in to buying carbon credits from Generation Investment Management LLP. Incidentally he owns that company. Coincedence? I think not. Until algore is ready to downsize to one 2000 sq ft house and install solar panels and maybe a wind turbine instead of having several houses with limos and SUVs idling outside 24/7 I am not ready to comply.

I believe that we do need to look in to alternative energy sources and try to limit the amount of CO and CO2 we emit. However, the solution will not come overnight and we need interim answers.

Common sense is perhaps the answer. Never mind, that would mean independent thinking, not allowed any more.

 

[Buster]

Whenever I have a minor disagreement with either of my left of me children, I tell them "it's an inconvenient truth". They roll their eyes but also are intelligent enough to know bs when they see it.

As it turns out, ol right wing dad is more green than they are.

So, chill out, Gore is just another huckster looking to scare people in to buying carbon credits from Generation Investment Management LLP. Incidentally he owns that company. Coincedence? I think not. Until algore is ready to downsize to one 2000 sq ft house and install solar panels and maybe a wind turbine instead of having several houses with limos and SUVs idling outside 24/7 I am not ready to comply.
.

One word for Algore:..HYPOCRITE!

 

[Bullitt]

It's amazing. We've got the biggest crisis on our hands since the 30's and our leaders are more concerned about placing taxes on those who do not properly cap their emissions.

 

[PessOptimist]

2 thoughts before I retire to get ready for my first day at work in 3 weeks:

isn't there CO2 in beer? will they outlaw beer?

how about carbonated soft drinks?

soon no more milk or steaks - unless PETA wins

breast implants - too tired, goin to bed now (good thing eh?)

 

[budnipper1]

- Friday, March 27, 2009
A United Nations document on "climate change" that will be distributed to a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge reordering of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer, millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes — all under the supervision of the world body.

Those and other results are blandly discussed in a discretely worded United Nations "information note" on potential consequences of the measures that industrialized countries will likely have to take to implement the Copenhagen Accord, the successor to the Kyoto Treaty, after it is negotiated and signed by December 2009. The Obama administration has said it supports the treaty process if, in the words of a U.S. State Department spokesman, it can come up with an "effective framework" for dealing with global warming.
Foxnews article-
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510937,00.html
​

 

[hessian]

- Friday, March 27, 2009
A United Nations document on "climate change" that will be distributed to a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge reordering of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer, millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes — all under the supervision of the world body.

Those and other results are blandly discussed in a discretely worded United Nations "information note" on potential consequences of the measures that industrialized countries will likely have to take to implement the Copenhagen Accord, the successor to the Kyoto Treaty, after it is negotiated and signed by December 2009. The Obama administration has said it supports the treaty process if, in the words of a U.S. State Department spokesman, it can come up with an "effective framework" for dealing with global warming.
Foxnews article-
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,510937,00.html
​

A sad day for the Nobel Peace Prize, and a true insult to all previous Prize winners.

 

[budnipper1]

A sad day for the Nobel Peace Prize, and a true insult to all previous Prize winners.

Exactly! That award used to mean something, but after Gore got it, all respect I had for it went right down the crapper.
​