Epic
Well-known member
I'm the furthest thing from a techy, so maybe a few more knowledgeable folks can shed some light on this topic.
I was thinking about IonQ, and just as I was, one of the cofounders decides to leave: https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/10/24/why-ionq-stock-sank-today/
Decades before co-founding IonQ in 2015, Dr. Chris Monroe was already a leading quantum-computing expert. In an official press release yesterday afternoon, the company said that Monroe was leaving to do what he used to, research and teach. Investors shouldn't downplay the loss for IonQ too much. After all, there are a limited number of individuals with the technical know-how and expertise in the field of quantum computing. Losing Monroe means losing one of the very best.
Perhaps investors are fearful that Monroe is really leaving because of problems at IonQ. After all, why would he leave if the company is on the cusp of becoming one of the great growth stocks of our time?
It seems they're still making great developments in this field though. Read > > > > https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ionq-achieves-industry-leading-performance-163100580.html
General Info:
https://www.fool.com/investing/stoc...echnology/ai-stocks/quantum-computing-stocks/
Seems like it would be a good match to accompany all the AI stuff that will be happening and taking over in the next span of 4 to 6 years.
Disclaimer: I've been wrong before.............................. A LOT ! ! ! ! !
:laugh:
I was thinking about IonQ, and just as I was, one of the cofounders decides to leave: https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/10/24/why-ionq-stock-sank-today/
Decades before co-founding IonQ in 2015, Dr. Chris Monroe was already a leading quantum-computing expert. In an official press release yesterday afternoon, the company said that Monroe was leaving to do what he used to, research and teach. Investors shouldn't downplay the loss for IonQ too much. After all, there are a limited number of individuals with the technical know-how and expertise in the field of quantum computing. Losing Monroe means losing one of the very best.
Perhaps investors are fearful that Monroe is really leaving because of problems at IonQ. After all, why would he leave if the company is on the cusp of becoming one of the great growth stocks of our time?
It seems they're still making great developments in this field though. Read > > > > https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ionq-achieves-industry-leading-performance-163100580.html
General Info:
https://www.fool.com/investing/stoc...echnology/ai-stocks/quantum-computing-stocks/
Seems like it would be a good match to accompany all the AI stuff that will be happening and taking over in the next span of 4 to 6 years.
Disclaimer: I've been wrong before.............................. A LOT ! ! ! ! !
:laugh:
