jdphx
Member
Ok... So I've been a member here for about a year.. with a long
time prior to that as a lurker. Never had the gumption to start my own
thread before.
Lazy I guess... and I spend so much time reading all of your threads,
and learning, that I wonder if I have anything useful to add.
But I have a notion, that needs room to discuss. And it would be plain rude
to hijack someone else's thread to open that discussion. So here it is.
I was always taught (and the "pro's" still preach it) that as you get nearer
to retirement, the less of your $$ should be invested in stocks. True for
individual stocks, and peeps like Birch maybe.
My big day is 12/2014, and as far as TSP, I just don't think that is the
prudent strategy. We can move all in, or all out on a day's notice. So how
can NOT being mostly or all in be a bad thing?
For the historians... What is the biggest 1 day loss? Or average of the
10 biggest down days? How much is too much? I think I've just had an
eyeopening!!!
jd
time prior to that as a lurker. Never had the gumption to start my own
thread before.
Lazy I guess... and I spend so much time reading all of your threads,
and learning, that I wonder if I have anything useful to add.
But I have a notion, that needs room to discuss. And it would be plain rude
to hijack someone else's thread to open that discussion. So here it is.
I was always taught (and the "pro's" still preach it) that as you get nearer
to retirement, the less of your $$ should be invested in stocks. True for
individual stocks, and peeps like Birch maybe.
My big day is 12/2014, and as far as TSP, I just don't think that is the
prudent strategy. We can move all in, or all out on a day's notice. So how
can NOT being mostly or all in be a bad thing?
For the historians... What is the biggest 1 day loss? Or average of the
10 biggest down days? How much is too much? I think I've just had an
eyeopening!!!
jd