Governor Forces STD Vaccine on Little Texans

Right-wing conservative (obviously not!) Texas governor Rick Perry has single-handedly decided to force young girls to get the STD vaccine.

While the vaccine is (?unethically) misrepresented by the manufacturer and subsequently in the media, and the executive decision is irresponsibly hasty given what we have yet to learn about vaccine, it may prove to be a beneficial preventive measure. Still, for Perry require it for school attendance makes me all the more concerned about what actually goes on in those public schools. I tolerate the State-mandated vaccinations for typical childhood diseases because these are easily spread in a school environment. The only way HPV is spread is through $¢%ual contact. I'm afraid to find out how much disease will be prevented by requiring this for school.

On the surface Perry claims (from the KAPLOWD article above) that he couldn't "look a young woman in the eye who suffers from this form of cancer and tell her that we could have stopped it but we didn't." This is an incredibly contrived stretch. First, as governor or the government in general, he only has a responsibility of making people aware and ensuring the vaccine, first is safe, then is available. Not required. Not necessarily free. (It's not a cheap "requirement" either.) If Perry wants to take this stance and impose health on the people, then he ought to be consistent and outlaw cigarettes, maybe alcohol, and certainly any Calories above and beyond those needed to maintain optimal body weight. How about requiring some sort of physical activity for school attendance. This would actually make a heckuvalot more sense, prevent a lot more disease, and probably encounter a lot less resistance (from constituants, not necessarily "interest groups").

Anyway, thanks for the post and raising awareness of this inanity. Don't get me going.:mad:
 
Sounds like a great idea... Lets remove accountability by eliminating the consequences! All aboard!!!!

But I think we are missing the positive out of this, theyre helping these little girls make one less decision. Isnt that the role of government?

Thankfully the drug isnt trademark protected so they can guarantee the lowest cost to the Texan taxpayers...

/sarcasm off
 
And this coming from MSN http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17246920/:
------------------------------------------------------------------
Drugmaker stops lobbying efforts for STD shots

TRENTON, N.J. - Merck & Co., bowing to pressure from parents and medical groups, is immediately suspending its lobbying campaign to persuade state legislatures to mandate that adolescent girls get the company’s new vaccine against cervical cancer as a requirement for school attendance.

The drug maker, which announced the change Tuesday, had been criticized for quietly funding the campaign, via a third party, to require 11- and 12-year-old girls get the three-dose vaccine in order to attend school.

Some had objected because the vaccine protects against a sexually transmitted disease, human papillomavirus (HPV), which causes cervical cancer. Vaccines mandated for school attendance usually are for diseases easily spread through casual contact, such as measles and mumps.

“Our goal is about cervical cancer prevention and we want to reach as many females as possible with Gardasil,” Dr. Richard M. Haupt, Merck’s medical director for vaccines, told The Associated Press.

“We’re concerned that our role in supporting school requirements is a distraction from that goal, and as such have suspended our lobbying efforts,” Haupt said, adding the company will continue providing information about the vaccine if requested by government officials.

Merck launched Gardasil, the first vaccine to prevent cervical cancer, in June. It protects against the two virus strains that cause 70 percent of cervical cancer and two strains that cause most genital warts.

Sales totaled $235 million through the end of 2006, according to Merck.

Timing of Merck's push questioned
Last month, the AP reported that Merck was channeling money for its state-mandate campaign through Women in Government, an advocacy group made up of female state legislators across the country.

Conservative groups opposed the campaign, saying it would encourage premarital sex, and parents’ rights groups said it interfered with their control over their children.

Even two of the prominent medical groups that supported broad use of the vaccine, the American Academy of Pediatricians and the American Academy of Family Practitioners, questioned Merck’s timing, Haupt said Tuesday.

“They, along with some other folks in the public health community, believe there needs to be more time,” he said, to ensure government funding for the vaccine for uninsured girls is in place and that families and government officials have enough information about it.

Legislatures in roughly 20 states have introduced measures that would mandate girls have the vaccine to attend school, but none has passed so far. However, Texas Gov. Rick Perry on Feb. 2 issued an executive order requiring Texas girls entering the sixth grade as of 2008 get the vaccinations, triggering protests from lawmakers in that state.

Perry defended his order Tuesday, a day after lawmakers in Austin held a lengthy hearing on the issue but failed to act on a bill to override the order.

Gardasil will have bigger effect in poor countries
Dr. Anne Francis, who chairs an American Academy of Pediatrics committee that advocates for better insurer reimbursement on vaccines, called Merck’s change of heart “a good move for the public.”

“I believe that their timing was a little bit premature,” she said, “so soon after (Gardasil’s) release, before we have a picture of whether there are going to be any untoward side effects.”

Given that the country has been “burned” by some drugs whose serious side effects emerged only after they were in wide use, including Merck’s withdrawn painkiller Vioxx, Francis said, it would be better to wait awhile before mandating Gardasil usage.

She said she also was concerned about requiring a vaccine for a disease that is not communicable and so does not have a big public health impact. While doctors expect Gardasil to have a huge effect in poor countries where women do not get Pap smears, in this country those tests limit the incidence of cervical cancer to about 9,710 new cases and 3,700 deaths each year.

The National Vaccine Information Center has been publicizing reports of side effects — mostly dizziness and fainting — in several dozen people getting Gardasil, which is approved for use in females ages 9 to 26. The center, a group of parents worried that vaccines harm some children, questions whether the vaccine was tested in enough young girls.

Officials with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, however, say that reports of side effects through the end of January don’t raise any red flags.

The vaccine also is controversial because of its price — $360 for the three doses required over a six-month stretch. Because of that cost and what pediatricians and gynecologists say is inadequate reimbursement by insurers, many are choosing not to stock the vaccine or requiring surcharges to administer it, increasing the cost for many families and making the vaccine hard to come by.

Merck shares were down in after-hours trading on the New York Stock Exchange, falling 35 cents to $44.15 after rising 22 cents in regular trading to close at $44.50.
 
Back
Top