Global Warming Link to Drowned Polar Bears BUSTED!!

"I have a solution! If we can get FWM and nnuut to agree on something, Hell will freeze over and maybe it will take care of global warming.
laugh.gif
"

GOOD IDEA! I think you have a valid point. Although you have to realize that I respect my friends FWM's opinion because he is a professional and has much more education and experience than I do about the subject. What I post is what I think is the obvious truth an my mind is made up, UNLESS you can show me the holes. I think more CO2 is expelled from carbonated soft drinks, champagne, and animal flatulence than from VOLCANOES, Opps I meant to say autos. CO2 is not our problem it's stupidity!
 
I have a solution! If we can get FWM and nnuut to agree on something, Hell will freeze over and maybe it will take care of global warming. :laugh:
 
Generalizations are the easy way out.
I think we've been through all this before and are in a stalemate.
 
Then there is this::nuts:
11/29/2011 @ 4:59PM |2,984 views
Climategate II: More Smoking Guns From The Global Warming Establishment

A new release of incriminating e-mail exchanges between leading climate scientists that is now being termed “Climategate II” actually represents but another episode in a continuing scandal that has been taking place for decades. This fraud of massive scope and consequence has served as the basis for arguably the greatest regulatory overreach of all time.
It has been used to justify the EPA’s demands that restrict carbon dioxide and other “greenhouse gas” emissions from stationary sources they attribute to causing climate change. Included are electrical power generation facilities, iron and steel mills, pulp and paper mills, cement production, and the construction industry.
The EPA’s “Endangerment Finding”applied to support these actions was based upon politically-manipulated human-caused climate warming conclusions issued by the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that were even at odds with findings of its own internal study on the matter. That EPA report stated “given the downward trend in temperatures since 1998 (which some think will continue until at least 2030), there is no particular reason to rush into decisions based upon a scientific hypothesis that does not appear to explain most of the available data.”
Click to expand...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybe...g-guns-from-the-global-warming-establishment/
 
RealMoneyIssues said:
But it DID cause some...
Click to expand...
Nah, it's cloud cover and atmospheric pressure, think of Venus completely covered with cloud cover and the atmospheric pressure is much greater than earth's. Without such an increase in pressure it just can't happen here. The oceans ability of storing and releasing CO2 into the atmosphere regulates the .11% of the atmosphere that is CO2, man made CO2 is only 3% of that .11% the rest is NATURE! Water dissolves CO2, yes even rain and humidity does. Too complicated for me.:cool:
 
Let me get this straight. "most of the warming is with the overnight low temperatures." Clouds are the biggest contributer to GW. When was it clear and when/where was it cloudy? Yes clear nights/days can be colder, so we have mainly cloudy or the CO2 is holding in the heat and causing the warming, which is it. I read an article that CO2 doesn't contribute to warming to the extent that was thought and they proved it. I'm watching Conan the Barbarian right now and have to get back I will post it later.:laugh:
 
Prove it, show me the holes, make me a believer. I don't want to see the Hockey Stick, or any other drummed up information.:cheesy:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top