Bluehenge's Account Talk

Bluehenge

Member
Welcome to my Account Talk!

I am pleased to be part of tsp talk as I feel there is a wealth of useful information here. My husband is eligible to retire but, we have put that off until this summer in order to add a bit more to the retirement pot. Until now we haven't managed the tsp account well at all. Basically we did nothing unless coworkers mentioned drastic market movement. Our timing was delayed and in hindsight was not good. We sold after the market crashed and bought once it was back on its feet. Hopefully I will do better now I have hands on and a much better support group.

Currently I have the account in G 100%. I have read up on the various funds but, find most information is about the s&p500 so, plan to make that fund the one I try timing. I'd like to learn more about the S fund as I see it usually grows better than the C and I also see that other members invest in several funds at one time.

Thank you to all who post as I really don't know how to find so much information on my own and a lot of you can make much more sense of the charts than I.

Hi Grandma and Handballer! I hope you, yours and your accounts are doing well.

Bluehenge :)
 
Thanks Uptrend.

Your Account Talk is one I am going to make sure I keep up with because your posts are very informative and I feel I will use a lot of it to try and time my moves.

Bluehenge
 
Welcome Bluehenge! I was much like you before finding this site a few years back and have learned more than I thought I ever would about the stock market and have managed to do much better with my account since then, except for 2008, when most of us got caught off guard. There are some really knowledgeable folks here. GL on managing your account..:)
 
Welcome to my Account Talk!

WOW !!! What a delightful surprise. I love your signiture too !

I am pleased to be part of tsp talk as I feel there is a wealth of useful information here.

Well we are thrilled to have you here. :)

My husband is eligible to retire but, we have put that off until this summer in order to add a bit more to the retirement pot.

Gosh time flies :nuts: Seems like just a few years back when he got out of school.

Until now we haven't managed the tsp account well at all. Basically we did nothing unless coworkers mentioned drastic market movement.

That describes a lot of us -- so you're in good company.

Our timing was delayed and in hindsight was not good.

Wouldn't it be wonderful if GOD gave a few of us the ability to use Hindsight to play the Markets...;) ... but it would be kind of weird because we wouldn't be able to explain it.

So I would start stressing things like the VIX - B Bands and all the other stuff.

We sold after the market crashed

I made the same mistake -- and really made Birch mad but I guess you reach some point where you say enough is enough.

and bought once it was back on its feet. Hopefully I will do better now I have hands on and a much better support group.

You'll do great -- just give it time.


Bluehenge :)

Wow -- sounds like a goldmine addition !!

Welcome to the MB !!
 
Hello and thank you to those who continue to welcome me to the message board.

I have been reading account talk posts, following the IFT's and got quite a few outside charts that I now watch (thanks to other member's blogs/talk accounts).

I am still in the G Fund 100%. I don't mind being in the G Fund as it's growing at a higher rate than a money market account. I do have some intentions of buying some C Fund shares at some point but, it's still too risky.

I'm not sure if the market is always so up and down but, today seems like it could be the start of another intermediate downtrend and I don't want to risk more down moves than up.

I did hear the news about Berkshire Hathway Class B shares going into the s&p 500 today. Also it is Chinese New Year next week as well as a four day week and Opex. I'm not sure which events are good or bad for share prices and would like to hear opinions.

It really is nice being part of TSP Talk!

Blue :)
 
I IFT'd 10 % into C today. I should have followed Frixxxx and CapeChem yesterday but, didn't. Still, I am hoping the market goes up tomorrow and either stays up or at least doesn't go down so fast that I won't be able to get out without too much lost. Fingers crossed for the best.
Bluehenge :)
 
You might want to check out where i finished on the tracker last year before you follow me anywhere!!! fingers are crossed
 
Posted by CapeChem:
You might want to check out where i finished on the tracker last year before you follow me anywhere!!!
Lol. That's okay. From what I see there are a lot of knowledgeable people that end up at the lower end of the tracker. Timing the market with just 2 IFTs per month is obviously very difficult. I have been watching a few charts and been saving my IFT's until I felt like it was a decision I wanted to make. IF I had followed you yesterday I would have bought at a better share price. That's really what I meant. Might have to follow you now I'm in though! :) Getting out is harder than getting in~
Blue
 
THE SEC puts new curbs on short-selling...
"The rule puts in a so-called circuit breaker for stock prices, restricting for the rest of a trading session and the next one any short-selling of a stock that has dropped 10 percent or more."
The full text from Yahoo Finance is below.
SEC adopts new 'circuit breaker' curbs on short-selling in bid to buttress market stability





By Marcy Gordon, AP Business Writer , On Wednesday February 24, 2010, 2:43 pm
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Federal regulators on Wednesday imposed new curbs on the practice of short-selling, hoping to prevent spiraling sales sprees in a stock that can stoke market turmoil.
The Securities and Exchange Commission, divided along party lines, voted 3-2 at a public meeting to adopt a new rule. Investors and lawmakers have clamored for the agency to put such brakes on trading moves they say worsened the market's downturn in the fall of 2008.
The rule puts in a so-called circuit breaker for stock prices, restricting for the rest of a trading session and the next one any short-selling of a stock that has dropped 10 percent or more. The new curbs take effect in about 60 days but stock exchanges have six months after that to implement them.
Short-sellers bet against a stock, in a practice that is legal and widely used on Wall Street. They borrow a company's shares, sell them and then buy them when the stock falls and return them to the lender -- pocketing the difference in price.
The SEC move followed months of wrestling with the controversial issue. The SEC asked for public comment last April on several alternative approaches to restraining short-selling, and a bipartisan group of senators have pushed the agency to act or face legislation. The agency got more than 4,300 comments on the issue.
Sens. Ted Kaufman, D-Del., and Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., who head the group, called Wednesday's action by the SEC "a step forward" but said its effect will be limited, "helping only in the worst-case scenarios that could occur during a terrorist attack or financial crisis."
What is needed, they said, is restoration of the Depression-era uptick rule, a permanent constraint allowing short-sellers to come in only at a price above the highest current bid for a stock. The SEC abolished the uptick rule in July 2007, when the stock market was near its peak.
The SEC staff estimates that only 1.3 percent of all stocks hit the 10 percent decline threshold during normal trading days without wild market swings.
Investor confidence was shaken as the market plunged amid the financial crisis in late 2008, and proponents of restoring restraints said they were needed to prevent abusive trading. They maintained that the absence of restraints fanned market volatility, prompting hedge funds and other aggressive investors to target weak companies with an avalanche of short-selling.
But opponents said new restrictions could eliminate the benefits of short-selling -- bringing capital into the markets and accurate stock prices to the surface -- and actually hurt investor confidence.
That debate was mirrored among the SEC commissioners at Wednesday's meeting. The two Republicans, Kathleen Casey and Troy Paredes, disputed that the curbs would bolster investor confidence and said they could hurt the market's efficiency.
Casey said she was "deeply concerned" that the action seemed to be guided more by "public relations" than evidence of the benefit of the rule. It could "undermine our credibility in the long run," she said.
Under the new rule, once a "circuit breaker" has been triggered, short-selling in the affected stock will be permitted only if the price is above the current highest bid for the stock. That restriction would apply for the rest of the trading session and the next day's session.
The SEC said the rule strikes a balance between two objectives: preventing short sellers from driving the price of a gutted stock even lower and preserving the benefits to investors from legitimate short-selling, such as pumping cash into the market. The balance comes, the agency said, because the "circuit breaker" restrictions are temporary and are applied to a specific trading session, in contrast to other alternatives such as the uptick rule that would institute permanent constraints.
"The reason this rule makes sense is because it recognizes that short-selling can potentially have both a beneficial and a harmful impact on the market -- depending on the circumstances," SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro said.
Schapiro said it's important for the SEC and the markets "to have in place a measure that creates certainty about how trading restrictions will operate during periods of stress and volatility."
Jack A. Ablin, chief investment officer at Harris Private Bank in Chicago, said the new rule would only come into play during extreme cases and wouldn't dramatically impact trading.
"I get a little squeamish when the SEC tries to restrict short-selling, but I think at least in this case they're likely to steer clear of a lot of unintended consequences," Ablin said. "By requiring a 10 percent drop in the stock, they're going after the outliers."
Still, some financial industry players said the new rule would disrupt the markets.
The Coalition of Private Investment Companies, an influential hedge fund lobby group, said the new short-selling curbs "will harm investors' interests by raising transaction costs, reducing market quality, and undermining confidence in the markets' ability to determine prices fairly and efficiently."
Scott Talbott, chief lobbyist for the Financial Services Roundtable, whose members include the largest banks, said the group supports the rule. "It attempts to provide certainty to investors during an uncertain period," he said.
Big banks including Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and Merrill Lynch were among the companies that, critics said, were victims of "bear raids" by short sellers that played a key role in forcing their collapse during the market turmoil.
In a separate, 5-0 vote Wednesday, the SEC commissioners adopted a statement laying out the agency's support for global accounting standards and its belief that they would benefit U.S. investors. The statement says the SEC continues to encourage the convergence of U.S. accounting standards with the norms known as International Financial Reporting Standards.
In 2008, the SEC proposed a plan allowing public companies to begin using international accounting standards for reporting financial results this year. The push by the agency toward acceptance of a single, global set of accounting standards has raised objections from some investor advocates and lawmakers but has been welcomed by Wall Street interests and the accounting industry.
AP Business Writer Stevenson Jacobs in New York contributed to this report.
Bluehenge
 
Posted by tsptalk:
One of Doug Kass's predictions for 2010 was that there would be some kind of ban made on short selling this year.
Wow! I wonder how many of his other predictions will come to be! He made a lot didn't he!
Blue
 
THE SEC puts new curbs on short-selling...
"The rule puts in a so-called circuit breaker for stock prices, restricting for the rest of a trading session and the next one any short-selling of a stock that has dropped 10 percent or more."
The full text from Yahoo Finance is below.

Bluehenge
From Article:
"The reason this rule makes sense is because it recognizes that short-selling can potentially have both a beneficial and a harmful impact on the market -- depending on the circumstances," SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro said.

Now why we making a rule again?:suspicious:
 
Back in 2007 they thru the uptick ruling out, was that part of SEC plan to clean out the market? Hmmm:notrust: What are they up to now?
 
Back
Top