imported post
From the TSP site, I took daily prices of the 5 funds, found Friday-Friday weekly
returns and analyzed the correlations. The results can be useful for those looking
to diversify into uncorrelated funds to minmize volatility.
Weekly Correlations and Means june 6 03- july 15 05
correl G F +7.8%
correl G C -0.3% correl F C -16.8%
correl G S -9.4% correl F S -18.1% correl C S +90.0%
correl G I -2.3% correl F I -7.4% correl C I +73.9% correl S I +71.1%
mean G 0.08% mean F 0.06% mean C 0.24% mean S 0.40% mean I 0.38%
What's it mean?
G & F are mildly correlated, G does better (mean) so forget F.
C S and I are strongly positively correlated to each other. So pick one of them.
Looking at the GC,GS and GI corrs, GC is least correlated and would be the best
from a diversification point of view. But S & I do 50% better than G (mean)
and G is less correlated to I than to S. So pick I. If this data is representative
and you have a 2 yr horizon, put your money into G and I and skip the others.
From the TSP site, I took daily prices of the 5 funds, found Friday-Friday weekly
returns and analyzed the correlations. The results can be useful for those looking
to diversify into uncorrelated funds to minmize volatility.
Weekly Correlations and Means june 6 03- july 15 05
correl G F +7.8%
correl G C -0.3% correl F C -16.8%
correl G S -9.4% correl F S -18.1% correl C S +90.0%
correl G I -2.3% correl F I -7.4% correl C I +73.9% correl S I +71.1%
mean G 0.08% mean F 0.06% mean C 0.24% mean S 0.40% mean I 0.38%
What's it mean?
G & F are mildly correlated, G does better (mean) so forget F.
C S and I are strongly positively correlated to each other. So pick one of them.
Looking at the GC,GS and GI corrs, GC is least correlated and would be the best
from a diversification point of view. But S & I do 50% better than G (mean)
and G is less correlated to I than to S. So pick I. If this data is representative
and you have a 2 yr horizon, put your money into G and I and skip the others.